scholarly journals Evaluation of a Rapid Analyte Measurement Platform for West Nile Virus Detection Based on United States Mosquito Control Programs

2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banugopan Kesavaraju ◽  
Richard L. Lampman ◽  
Nina M. Krasavin ◽  
Michael Hutchinson ◽  
Sonya E. Graves ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Matteo Riccò ◽  
Simona Peruzzi ◽  
Federica Balzarini

During the last decade, cases of West Nile Virus (WNV) have occurred in the Emilia Romagna Region (ERR). Even though the notification rates remain relatively low, ranging from 0.06 to 1.83 cases/100,000 inhabitants, the persistent pathogen’s circulation in settings characterized by favorable environmental characteristics suggests that WNV is becoming endemic to the Po River Valley. This study assesses knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices toward WNV prevention among residents from 10 high-risk municipalities from the provinces of Parma and Reggio Emilia (total population: 82,317 inhabitants, census 2020). A web-based survey, based on the health belief model, was performed during the month of January 2021, with a convenience sampling of 469 participants from a series of closed discussion groups on social media (i.e., 2.1% of the potential responders). A total of 243 participants knew the meaning of WNV: Of them, 61.3% were aware of previous WNV infections in ERR, 76.5% acknowledged WNV infection as a severe one, but only 31.3% expressed any worry about WNV. Our results irregularly report preventive practices, either collective (e.g., draining standing water from items and the environment, 50.7%; spraying pesticides around the home, 33.0%) or individual (e.g., use of skin repellants when going outdoors, 42.6%). In a multivariate analysis, performed through binary logistic regression, participants reporting any worry towards WNV were more likely to characterize WNV as a severe disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 20.288, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.083–80.972). On the contrary, respondents supporting community mosquito control programs were more likely among people working with animals/livestock (aOR = 13.948, 95%CI = 2.793–69.653), and supporting tax exemptions for mosquito control programs (aOR = 4.069, 95%CI 2.098–7.893). In conclusion, our results suggest that future interventions promoting WNV prevention among residents in ERR should focus on perceptions of vulnerability to WNV, emphasizing the benefits of personal protective behaviors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leann Liu ◽  
Mustapha Debboun ◽  
Kasimu Muhetaer ◽  
Eric V. Bakota ◽  
Martin Reyna ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis abstract aims to: 1) describe human WNV infections in Harris County excluding the City of Houston, Texas, 2003 to 2018; 2) explore geographical distributions of WNV positive mosquito pools in relation to human cases; 3) provide a brief overview of the county’s rigorous multidisciplinary WNV surveillance and control in mosquitoes and humans.IntroductionWest Nile virus (WNV) is the leading cause of autochthonous arboviral disease in the United States1. The virus is primarily spread to people through the bite of infected Culex species of mosquitos. WNV was first identified in Harris County, Texas, in 20022. Since then, the mosquito-borne virus has become endemic in the region, with surges in 2012 and 2014. Although majority of individuals infected are asymptomatic, WNV induced neuroinvasive infections often result in hospitalizations and adverse outcomes3-7, thus may pose a significant concern in public health and healthcare. The Harris County Public Health (HCPH) Surveillance and Epidemiology Unit (SEU) conducts surveillance of WNV in humans, in collaboration with Mosquito and Vector Control Division (MVCD) that monitors the virus in mosquito populations and birds. Mosquito abatement activities are implemented in areas where positive mosquitoes and human cases are identified. In this integrated model, clusters of WNV positive mosquito pools in relation with human cases provide comprehensive surveillance data to guide targeted efforts of mosquito control, disease prevention, and community education.MethodsSurveillance data of human WNV cases and WNV tested mosquito pools 2003 to 2018 in Harris County excluding the City of Houston were used for the analysis. Human cases included were confirmed and probable cases. Frequencies, percentages, age-adjusted annual average rates were used to describe the data. Geographical locations of WNV positive mosquito pools and human cases were mapped and analyzed using ESRI ArcGIS to determine the spatial relationship between the positive mosquito pools and human cases. Space-Time analysis was performed on 16 years of human disease data using Scan statistics in SatScan™ to test the effect of time and identify significant geographical clusters of WNV cases over time, which revealed a statistically significant cluster in 2012 to 2014 in northwest of Harris County. Subsequently, human cases and WNV positive mosquito pools of 2012 to 2014 were selected for hotspot analysis to verify the results from Satscan analysis and visualize the geographical cluster. Human cases were aggregated into census tracts and analyzed by optimized hotspot method; the positive mosquito pools were geocoded using their intersection locations and analyzed by ESRI Getis-Ord Gi hotspot method.ResultsFrom 2003 to 2018, a total of 295 confirmed and probable human WNV cases were identified, including 217 neuroinvasive and 78 fever cases. The median age of patients was 58 years old; 64.8% were male. The onset of majority of the cases (80.7%) concentrated in July to September. Among case-patients, 72.9% were hospitalized, and 3.4% died. The annual average age-adjusted incidence rate of WNV was 0.7 per 100,000 during 2003 to 2018. However, the rate was 1.8 and 2.7 per 100,000 in 2012 and 2014, respectively. Over 68% of the cases clustered in west and northwest of the county.The annual WNV positive mosquito pools ranged from 0.2% to 10.2% amongst the years. The number of WNV positive mosquito pools in 2014 was more than 4 times higher than the average number during those years, the highest record in the County.Hot spots of human cases and the positive mosquito pools were both identified in northwest Harris County. There was a significant geographical overlap between human cases and the positive mosquito pools.The space-time analysis for the 16 years detected a significant high-risk cluster in 2012 to 2014 in northwest Harris County. Findings from optimized hotspot analysis on human cases are consistent with the results from SatScan analysis. Statistically significant hot spots of positive mosquito pools identified by Getis-Ord Gi hotspot analysis displayed highly overlay with the statistically significant cluster of human cases detected by Satscan space-time analysis.ConclusionsWNV infection is underestimated. Studies suggest that every one case identified represent five infections 8-9. Therefore, the actual number of cases is likely substantially higher. Clinicians should be alerted in WNV season and consider testing and reporting as early as possible, especially in neuroinvasive patients. The public should be encouraged to utilize personal protection, particularly during peak seasons. This analysis shows that GIS mapping and optimized hotspot analysis of WNV human cases in relation to positive mosquito pools can provide statistical evidences of areas most affected, thus inform targeted mosquito control, prevention and education strategies in people living in areas with high virus activitieReferences1. Reimann CA, Hayes EB, DiGuiseppi C, et al. Epidemiology of neuroinvasive arbovrial disease in the United States, 1999-2007, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2008:79:974-9.2. Kristy M. Lillibridge, Ray Parsons, Yvonne Randle, et al. The 2002 introduction of West Nile virus into Harris county, Texas, an area historically endemic for St. Louis encephalitis3. Mostashari F, Bunning ML, Kitsutani PT, et al. Epidemic West Nile encephalitis, New York, 1999: results of a household-based seroepidemiological survey. Lancet 2001;358:261-4.4. Busch MP, Wright DJ, Custer B, et al. West Nile virus infections projected from blood donor screening data, United States, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:395–402.5. Carson PJ, Borchardt SM, Custer B, et al. Neuroinvasive disease and West Nile virus infection, North Dakota, USA, 1999–2008. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:684–6.6. Sejvar JJ, Haddad MB, Tierney BC, et al. Neurologic Manifestations and outcome of west nile virus infection. JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):511-5.7. The outbreak of west nile virus infection in the New York City area in 19998. Surveillance for Human West Nile Virus Disease --- United States, 1999—2008, MMWR, April 2, 2010 / 59(SS02);1-179. West Nile Virus and Other Arboviral Diseases — United States, 2012, MMWR, June 28, 2013 / 62(25);513-517.


2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1516-1521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger S Nasci ◽  
John-Paul Mutebi

Abstract Over 50,000 human West Nile virus (WNV) (Flaviviridae: Flavivirus) clinical disease cases have been reported to the CDC during the 20 yr that the virus has been present in the United States. Despite the establishment and expansion of WNV-focused mosquito surveillance and control efforts and a renewed emphasis on applying integrated pest management (IPM) principles to WNV control, periodic local and regional WNV epidemics with case reports exceeding 2,000 cases per year have occurred during 13 of those 20 yr in the United States. In this article, we examine the scientific literature for evidence that mosquito control activities directed at either preventing WNV outbreaks or stopping those outbreaks once in progress reduce WNV human disease or have a measurable impact on entomological indicators of human WNV risk. We found that, despite a proliferation of research investigating larval and adult mosquito control effectiveness, few of these studies actually measure epidemiological outcomes or the entomological surrogates of WNV risk. Although many IPM principles (e.g., control decisions based on surveillance, use of multiple control methodologies appropriate for the ecosystem) have been implemented effectively, the use of action thresholds or meaningful public health outcome assessments have not been used routinely. Establishing thresholds for entomological indicators of human risk analogous to the economic injury level and economic thresholds utilized in crop IPM programs may result in more effective WNV prevention.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. McMillan ◽  
Christina A. Harden ◽  
James C. Burtis ◽  
Mallery I. Breban ◽  
John J. Shepard ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven T. Peper ◽  
Daniel E. Dawson ◽  
Nina Dacko ◽  
Kevan Athanasiou ◽  
Jordan Hunter ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT West Nile virus (WNV) was first detected in North America during 1999, and has since spread throughout the contiguous USA. West Nile virus causes West Nile fever and the more severe West Nile neuroinvasive disease. As part of a WNV vector surveillance program, we collected mosquitoes in Lubbock, Texas, using CO2-baited encephalitic vector survey (EVS) traps. During 219 wk from 2009 through 2017, EVS traps were operated for 1,748 trap nights, resulting in more than 101,000 mosquitoes captured. Weekly, selected female mosquito specimens were pooled by species and trap site, and screened for WNV using reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction assay. Mosquitoes positive for WNV were detected during 16.9% (37/219) of the weeks. Using this information, we constructed a statistical model to predict the probability of detecting an infection within a mosquito pool as a factor of weather variables. The final model indicated that detection of WNV in mosquitoes was negatively associated with the week of year squared and average wind from 3 wk prior to sampling, and was positively associated with week of year, average visibility, average humidity from 2 wk prior to sampling, and average dew point from 4 wk prior to sampling. The model developed in this study may aid public health and vector control programs in swift and effective decision making relative to city-wide mosquito control efforts by predicting when the chances of mosquitoes having WNV are at their greatest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S239-S239
Author(s):  
Arunmozhi S Aravagiri ◽  
Scott Kubomoto ◽  
Ayutyanont Napatkamon ◽  
Sarah Wilson ◽  
Sudhakar Mallela

Abstract Background Aseptic meningitis can be caused by an array of microorganisms, both bacterial and non-bacterial, as well as non-infectious conditions. Some etiologies of aseptic meningitis require treatment with antibiotics, antiviral, antifungals, anti-parasitic agents, immunosuppressants, and or chemotherapy. There are limited diagnostic tools for diagnosing certain types of aseptic meningitis, therefore knowing the differential causes of aseptic meningitis, and their relative percentages may assist in diagnosis. Review of the literature reveals that there are no recent studies of etiologies of aseptic meningitis in the United States (US). This is an epidemiologic study to delineate etiologies of aseptic meningitis in a large database of 185 HCA hospitals across the US. Methods Data was collected from January 2016 to December 2019 on all patients diagnosed with meningitis. CSF PCR studies, and CSF antibody tests were then selected for inclusion. Results Total number of encounters were 3,149 hospitalizations. Total number of individual labs analyzed was 10,613, and of these 262 etiologies were identified. 23.6% (62) of cases were due to enterovirus, 18.7% (49) due to HSV-2, 14.5% (38) due to West Nile virus, 13.7% (36) due to Varicella zoster (VZV), 10.5% (27) due to Cryptococcus. Additionally, we analyzed the rate of positive test results by region. Nationally, 9.7% of tests ordered for enterovirus were positive. In contrast, 0.5% of tests ordered for HSV 1 were positive. The southeastern United States had the highest rate of positive tests for HSV 2 (7% of tests ordered for HSV 2 were positive). The central United States had the highest rate of positive test for West Nile virus (11% of tests ordered for West Nile were positive). The northeastern region and the highest rate of positive tests for varicella zoster (18%). Table 1: Percentage of positive CSF tests (positive tests/tests ordered) Table 2: Lists the number of HIV patients and transplant patients that had positive CSF PCR/serologies Figure 1: Percentage of positive CSF tests in each region Conclusion Approximately 40% of aseptic meningitis population had treatable etiologies. A third of the Cryptococcus meningitis population had HIV. Furthermore, enteroviruses had the majority of cases within the US, which are similar to studies done in other parts of the world. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2015 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1013-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micah B. Hahn ◽  
Roger S. Nasci ◽  
Mark J. Delorey ◽  
Rebecca J. Eisen ◽  
Andrew J. Monaghan ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1539-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi E. Brown ◽  
James E. Childs ◽  
Maria A. Diuk-Wasser ◽  
Durland Fish

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document