Fuel Filter - Initial Single-Pass Efficiency Test Method

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Test Method ◽  
Single Pass ◽  
Fuel Filter ◽  
Efficiency Test

Fuel Filter - Initial Single-Pass Efficiency Test Method

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Test Method ◽  
Single Pass ◽  
Fuel Filter ◽  
Efficiency Test

Fuel Filters--Initial Single-Pass Efficiency Test Method

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Test Method ◽  
Single Pass ◽  
Efficiency Test

The Research and Application of Utility Boiler Energy Efficiency Test System

2013 ◽  
Vol 680 ◽  
pp. 289-294
Author(s):  
Heng Wen Zhang ◽  
Shuo Dong ◽  
Fang Yang
Keyword(s):  
Energy Efficiency ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
New Products ◽  
Test System ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Utility Boiler ◽  
Utility Boilers ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Blended Fuel ◽  
Efficiency Test

In order to improve identification of new products, we study the energy efficiency test of utility boilers. According to related protocols and test method of the current boiler energy efficiency, we build up the model of boiler thermal efficiency test in direct and indirect procedure. During the procedure, we analysis some key issues such as the blended fuel problem and the desulfurizer’s effect on energy efficiency. On this basis, we develop the Utility Boiler Thermal Efficiency Test System, which is used in boiler industry and achieves the intended purpose.

A Human Factor Study of Individual Home Appliance Energy Use

1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 443-443
Author(s):  
John V. Fechter
Keyword(s):  
Energy Efficiency ◽  
Energy Consumption ◽  
Energy Use ◽  
Human Factor ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Factor Study ◽  
Measured Efficiency ◽  
Home Appliance ◽  
Efficiency Test

For ten different kitchen ranges, forty-six different cooks prepared a standard 21 meal menu while the energy used by each cook was measured. The energy efficiency of each range was then determined and the ranges were rank-ordered in two ways—on the basis of measured range efficiency and energy actually used by cooks. In general, the higher the measured efficiency the lower the total energy use. This was an important result because it meant that the range efficiency test method to be required by Department of Energy (formerly Federal Energy Administration) regulations was a fair method for manufacturers to use. In addition to that result, large differences were noted in energy consumption by different cooks on the same range. The implications of those differences, and the need for further research about them will be discussed.

scholarly journals Efficiency Test of IRRI Fertilizing Recommendations on Rainfed Low Land Rice Field in West Kalimantan

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hatta ◽  
Mahyuddin Syam ◽  
Dwi Purnamawati Widiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Rice Field ◽  
Nutrient Management ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Fertility Level ◽  
National Scale ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Nutrient Sources ◽  
West Kalimantan ◽  
History Of ◽  
Efficiency Test

Fertilizing recommendation for lowland rice field in West Kalimantan is still in national scale and tends to be excessive. It is less relevant due to various factors such as the test method competence, the carrying capacity  of  the  land,  and  the  diverse  condition  of  rice  field  agro-ecosystem.  Site-specific  nutrient management (SSNM) is an approach for rice fertilizing on paddy plot based on science, history of land fertilization,  and  nutrient  sources  surrounding  the  area  which  can  affect  soil  fertility  level  and  soil conservation.This study was aimed to examine fertilizing efficiency of N, P, and K and the increased productivity of rice by utilizing software (website) of the IRRI. The study was conducted in farmers fields in two villages, i.e. Anjongan and Pak Bulu, Pontianak Regency, West Kalimantan. The results showed that the SSNM fertilization on rice increased yields by the average of 0.62 t ha-1 (13.47%) per growing season. The efficiency of SSNM fertilization was on the average of 22.05% N, 48.25% P2O5, and 31.50% K2O. The additional profits obtained from the SSNM recommendation was on the average of IDR 1,886,317 per ha pergrowing season compared to the profits from the FFP (farmer fertilizer practice).Keywords: Fertilizing efficiency, low land, rice, site specific fertilization [How to Cite: Muhammad H, M Syam and DP Widiastuti. 2014. Efficiency Test of IRRI Fertilizing Recommendations on Rainfed Low Land Rice Field in West Kalimantan. J Trop Soils 19: 25-33. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.25]   

scholarly journals Microbial Air Samplers for Meaningful Cleanroom Environmental Monitoring

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Eaton
Keyword(s):  
Collection Efficiency ◽  
Performance Testing ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Biological Efficiency ◽  
Testing Procedures ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Air Sampler ◽  
Airborne Microbes ◽  
Efficiency Test

Airborne microbiological concentrations within pharmaceutical cleanrooms are determined by sampling and to maximise the detection of any airborne microbes, it is essential that the sampling is undertaken in locations where there is greatest contamination risk using air samplers that have a verified and appropriate performance. Sampler performance can be assessed by review of both the physical and biological collection efficiencies that are determined by testing. The physical collection efficiency is the ability to collect particles of various sizes and the biological collection efficiency assesses the collection of viable microbes that includes the losses caused by the physical collection efficiency and the detrimental effect that the sampling has on the viability of the captured microbes. Due to the limitations of the established biological collection efficiency test method, this efficiency is only determined for microbes of sub-micron size which are not representative of the larger microbe-carrying particles typically present with cleanrooms. Samplers with a low physical collection efficiency for sub-micron particles are likely to have a poor performance when this test method is utilised and in an attempt to remove this bias from the testing the ‘biological efficiency’, is often reported. This is a measure of the likelihood that any captured microbes would survive, but is often mistaken for the biological collection efficiency and samplers may be utilised in the false belief that they have an appropriate performance. This article provides information regarding air sampler performance testing and reviews the test results reported by the same independent specialist testing company, therefore negating issues resulting from different testing methods, for three different air samplers. The results that are used to determine the ‘biological efficiency’ are examined to provide information relating to the biological collection efficiency of each sampler and to also provide additional information relating to the physical collection efficiency. Improvements to enhance the air sampler testing procedures, to enable a better direct comparison of the performance of different samplers, are suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document