scholarly journals Comparison of Cost, Risks, and Benefits of Robotic or Open Thyroidectomy on Thyroid Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hasan Zafer Acar ◽  
Ayşe Ülgen
BMC Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daqi Zhang ◽  
Tie Wang ◽  
Gianlorenzo Dionigi ◽  
Jiao Zhang ◽  
Yishen Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In this study, we aimed to compare the kinetics of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) during the perioperative period of endoscopic thyroidectomy via bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) in the same period, following a traditional open thyroidectomy approach (OTA). Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of patients who were undergoing thyroidectomy and level VI clearance. Patients who had been affected by papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) were stratified into three groups: those eligible for endoscopic treatment (ETBAA); patients who were eligible for ETBAA but had opted for OTA (OTA-L); and patients who were not suitable for endoscopic intervention (OTA-H). A process for locating parathyroid glands was utilized to stratify gland dissection laboriousness. In Type A, the gland is firmly fixed to thyroid gland. This type can be sub-classified into three subtypes. A1: the parathyroid gland is attached to the inherent thyroid capsule. A2: the gland is partially embedded in the thyroid gland. A3: the gland is located in the thyroid tissue. Type B is defined as a gland which is separated from the thyroid gland. The iPTH was sampled at wound closure. Results There were 100 patients in each group. We found a significant difference between the ETBAA and OTA-H groups for type A2, as well as a loss of parathyroid glands and a number of parathyroid transplantation procedures. The endoscopic group was treated during an earlier stage of thyroid cancer. The iPTH profile of each group decreased, although this was the most consistent in the OTA-H group. A comparison of ETBAA with OTA-L demonstrates that the iPTH level change is similar. Conclusion There is no advantage of endoscopic treatment for preserving parathyroid function.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. R473-R484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Blumhardt ◽  
Ely A Wolin ◽  
William T Phillips ◽  
Umber A Salman ◽  
Ronald C Walker ◽  
...  

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy and the fifth most common cancer in women. DTC therapy requires a multimodal approach, including surgery, which is beyond the scope of this paper. However, for over 50 years, the post-operative management of the DTC post-thyroidectomy patient has included radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation and/or therapy. Before 2000, a typical RAI post-operative dose recommendation was 100 mCi for remnant ablation, 150 mCi for locoregional nodal disease, and 175–200 mCi for distant metastases. Recent recommendations have been made to decrease the dose in order to limit the perceived adverse effects of RAI including salivary gland dysfunction and inducing secondary primary malignancies. A significant controversy has thus arisen regarding the use of RAI, particularly in the management of the low-risk DTC patient. This debate includes the definition of the low-risk patient, RAI dose selection, and whether or not RAI is needed in all patients. To allow the reader to form an opinion regarding post-operative RAI therapy in DTC, a literature review of the risks and benefits is presented.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 3985-4001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-hua Pan ◽  
Hong Zhou ◽  
Xiao-xu Zhao ◽  
Hui Ding ◽  
Li Wei ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Yuk Wah Liu ◽  
Enders Kwok Wai Ng

While open thyroidectomy (OT) is advocated as the gold standard treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer, the contemporary use of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) is often controversial. Although RT combines the unique benefits of the surgical robot and remote access thyroidectomy, its applicability on cancer patients is challenged by the questionable oncological benefits and safety. This review aims to analyze the current literature evidence in comparing RT to OT on thyroid cancers for their perioperative and oncological outcomes. To date, no randomized controlled trial is available in comparing RT to OT. All published studies are nonrandomized or retrospective comparisons. Current data suggests that RT compares less favorably than OT for longer operative time, higher cost, and possibly inferior oncological control with lower number of central lymph nodes retrieved. In terms of morbidity, quality of life outcomes, and short-term recurrence rates, RT and OT are comparable. While conventional OT continues to be appropriate for most thyroid cancers, RT should better be continued by expert surgeons on selected patients who have low-risk thyroid cancers and have high expectations on cosmetic outcomes. Future research should embark on prospective randomized studies for unbiased comparisons. Long-term follow-up studies are also needed to evaluate outcomes on recurrence and survival.


Gland Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1172-1181
Author(s):  
Kwangsoon Kim ◽  
Sang-Wook Kang ◽  
Jin Kyong Kim ◽  
Cho Rok Lee ◽  
Jandee Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document