scholarly journals The univariate difference estimator of the population total under double sampling or inclusion probablilities when the total of the auxiliary variable is known

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G A Udofia
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Kanwai ◽  
O. E. Asiribo ◽  
A. Isah

This paper explore the need for exploiting auxiliary variables in sample survey and utilizing asymptotically optimum estimator in double sampling to increase the efficiency of estimators. The study proposed two types of estimators with two auxiliary variables for two phase sampling when there is no information about auxiliary variables at population level. The expressions for the Mean Squared Error (MSE) of the proposed estimators were derived to the first order of approximation. An empirical comparative approach of the minimum variances and percent relative efficiency were adopted to study the efficiency of the proposed and existing estimators. It was established that, the proposed estimators performed more efficiently than the mean per unit estimator and other previous estimators that don’t use auxiliary variable and that are not asymptotically optimum. Also, it was established that estimators that are asymptotically optimum that utilized single auxiliary variable are more efficient than those that are not asymptotically optimum with two auxiliary variables.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
S. Kumar ◽  
B. V. S. Sisodia

In the present paper, a model based calibration estimator of population total has been developed when study variable y and auxiliary variable x are inversely related. The relative performance of the proposed model based calibration estimator in comparison to model based estimator, the usual regression estimator and calibration based regression estimator have been examined by conducting a limited simulation study. In view of the results of the simulation study, it has been found that model based calibration estimator has outperformed the other estimators. However, calibration based regression estimator was found to be close to the model based calibration estimator.  


2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-46
Author(s):  
Jehad Al-Jararha ◽  
Ala' Bataineh

The estimation of the population total $t_y,$ by using one or moreauxiliary variables, and the population ratio $\theta_{xy}=t_y/t_x,$$t_x$ is the population total for the auxiliary variable $X$, for afinite population are heavily discussed in the literature. In thispaper, the idea of estimation the finite population ratio$\theta_{xy}$ is extended to use the availability of auxiliaryvariable $Z$ in the study, such auxiliary variable  is not used inthe definition of the population ratio. This idea may be  supported by the fact that the variable $Z$  is highly correlated with the interest variable $Y$ than the correlation between the variables $X$ and $Y.$ The availability of such auxiliary variable can be used to improve the precision of the estimation of the population ratio.  To our knowledge, this idea is not discussed in the literature.  The bias, variance and the mean squares error  are given for our approach. Simulation from real data set,  the empirical relative bias and  the empirical relative mean squares error are computed for our approach and different estimators proposed in the literature  for estimating the population ratio $\theta_{xy}.$ Analytically and the simulation results show that, by suitable choices, our approach gives negligible bias and has less mean squares error.  


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipaporn Chutiman ◽  
Monchaya Chiangpradit

In this paper, we study the estimators of the population total in adaptive cluster sampling by using the information of the auxiliary variable. The numerical examples showed that the ratio estimator in adaptive cluster sampling without replacement of networks is more efficient than the ratio estimators in adaptive cluster sampling without replacement of units.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
A.E. Anieting ◽  
E. I. Enang ◽  
C. E. Onwukwe

A modified form of the population mean estimator suggested by Anieting and Enang (2020) in stratified double sampling in the presence of nonresponse using a single auxiliary variable has been proposed. The Mean Squared Error (MSE) and the bias of the proposed estimator have been given using large sample approximation. The empirical study shows that the MSE of the suggested estimator is more efficient than all other existing estimators in the same scheme. Determination of the optimal values of the first and second phases samples has also been done


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document