scholarly journals Effect of abiraterone combined with prednisone on serum CgA and NSE in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 631-637
Author(s):  
Ke Yang ◽  
Tieqiu Li ◽  
Zhiyong Gao ◽  
Weiwei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Neuron Specific Enolase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression

Purpose: To investigate the influence of a combination of abiraterone and prednisone on serum chromogranin A (CgA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) without previous chemotherapy, so as to provide reference data for drug therapy of prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 103 mCRPC patients without chemotherapy from January 2013 to March 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Seventy-one (71) patients received prednisone combined with abiraterone (study group), while 32 patients accepted prednisone (control group). The CgA, NSE and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the two groups were monitored, while PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined during follow-up. Results: PSA-PFS, rPFS and OS in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The increased proportion of CgA or NSE in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 6 months of treatment (p < 0.05). The occurrences of NED before treatment and 6 months after treatment were both independent predictors of PSA and radiographic progression in the study group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of prednisone and abiraterone is helpful for prognosis in mCRPC patients that are not on chemotherapy. The occurrence of NED predicts mostly poor prognosis of mCRPC patients on a combination of abiraterone and prednisone

scholarly journals Abiraterone Alone or in Combination With Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen During Enzalutamide Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (25) ◽  
pp. 2639-2646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhardt Attard ◽  
Michael Borre ◽  
Howard Gurney ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Corina Andresen-Daniil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression

Purpose Enzalutamide resistance could result from raised androgens and be overcome by combination with abiraterone acetate. PLATO ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01995513) interrogated this hypothesis using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Patients and Methods In period one, men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer received open-label enzalutamide 160 mg daily. Men with no prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase at weeks 13 and 21 were treated until PSA progression (≥ 25% increase and ≥ 2 ng/mL above nadir), then randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio in period two to abiraterone acetate 1,000 mg daily and prednisone 5 mg twice daily with either enzalutamide or placebo (combination or control group, respectively) until disease progression as defined by the primary end point: progression-free survival (radiographic or unequivocal clinical progression or death during study). Secondary end points included time to PSA progression and PSA response in period two. Results Of 509 patients enrolled in period one, 251 were randomly assigned in period two. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months in the combination group and 5.6 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.12; P = .22). There was no difference in the secondary end points. Grade 3 hypertension (10% v 2%) and increased ALT (6% v 2%) or AST (2% v 0%) were more frequent in the combination than the control group. Conclusion Combining enzalutamide with abiraterone acetate and prednisone is not indicated after PSA progression during treatment with enzalutamide alone; hypertension and elevated liver enzymes are more frequent with combination therapy.

scholarly journals Consecutive Prostate Cancer Specimens Revealed Increased Aldo–Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C3 Expression with Progression to Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Miyazaki ◽  
Yuki Teramoto ◽  
Shinsuke Shibuya ◽  
Takayuki Goto ◽  
Kosuke Okasho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Immunohistochemical Expression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression ◽  
Prostatic Epithelium

Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3 (AKR1C3) is an enzyme in the steroidogenesis pathway, especially in formation of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, and is believed to have a key role in promoting prostate cancer (PCa) progression, particularly in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This study aims to compare the expression level of AKR1C3 between benign prostatic epithelium and cancer cells, and among hormone-naïve prostate cancer (HNPC) and CRPC from the same patients, to understand the role of AKR1C3 in PCa progression. Correlation of AKR1C3 immunohistochemical expression between benign and cancerous epithelia in 134 patient specimens was analyzed. Additionally, correlation between AKR1C3 expression and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS) after radical prostatectomy was analyzed. Furthermore, we evaluated the consecutive prostate samples derived from 11 patients both in the hormone-naïve and castration-resistant states. AKR1C3 immunostaining of cancer epithelium was significantly stronger than that of the benign epithelia in patients with localized HNPC (p < 0.0001). High AKR1C3 expression was an independent factor of poor PSA PFS (p = 0.032). Moreover, AKR1C3 immunostaining was significantly stronger in CRPC tissues than in HNPC tissues in the same patients (p = 0.0234). Our findings demonstrate that AKR1C3 is crucial in PCa progression.

scholarly journals A Multicentric, Retrospective Efficacy and Safety Study of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Aseem Samar ◽  
Srikant Tiwari ◽  
Sundaram Subramanian ◽  
Nisarg Joshi ◽  
Jaykumar Sejpal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Psa Progression ◽  
Weekly Group

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Materials and Methods. In this multicenter, retrospective study, we analyzed the medical charts of mCRPC patients, who were treated with NDLS administered as 2-weekly (50 mg/m2) or 3-weekly regimens (75 mg/m2). The study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (>50% PSA decline from baseline), PSA progression (PSA increase from baseline beyond 12 weeks: ≥25% and ≥2 ng/mL), median PSA decline, and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Results. Data of 24 patients with mCRPC were analyzed in this study. NDLS was administered as a 2-weekly regimen in 37.5% (9/24; all first-line) patients and as a 3-weekly regimen in 62.5% patients (15/24; first-line: 20% (3/15), second-line: 80% (12/15)). Overall, PSA response was reported in 66.7% (16/24) patients. The PSA response was 77.8% (7/9 patients) in the 2-weekly group and 60% (9/15 patients) in the 3-weekly group. The median decline in PSA was 96.31% in the 2-weekly group and 83.29% in the 3-weekly group; the median TTF was 6.7 and 6.5 months in the 2 weekly group and 3-weekly group, respectively. The median OS was 14.6 months (follow-up: 5.5–25.8 months) in the 2-weekly group whereas it was not reached in the 3-weekly group (follow-up: 7.9–15.6 months). The most common hematological AEs were anemia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia whereas nausea, weakness, constipation, vomiting, and diarrhea were the most common (≥10%) nonhematological AEs. Overall, NDLS treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. Conclusions. Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (2-weekly or 3-weekly) was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Combined CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with increased myeloid and neutrophil immune subsets in the bone microenvironment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e002919
Author(s):  
Sumit K Subudhi ◽  
Bilal A Siddiqui ◽  
Ana M Aparicio ◽  
Shalini S Yadav ◽  
Sreyashi Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Microenvironment ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Measurable Disease

BackgroundImmune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has low response rates in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), in part due to few T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration but induces upregulation of PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) within the prostate TME. Combined anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 can partly overcome this adaptive resistance and was recently shown to augment responses in patients with mCRPC with measurable disease. Although bone is the most common site of metastasis in prostate cancer, patients with bone-predominant disease are frequently excluded from trials because they lack measurable disease, which limits assessment of disease progression and tissue sampling. We therefore designed this study to investigate combined ICT in mCRPC to bone.HypothesisCombined anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) plus anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) is safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone.Patients and methodsIn this single-arm pilot study, men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone received tremelimumab (75 mg intravenous) plus durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) every 4 weeks (up to four doses), followed by durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) maintenance every 4 weeks (up to nine doses). The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and maximal PSA decline.ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated between August 8, 2017 and March 28, 2019. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 11 patients (42%), with no grade 4 or 5 events. TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in three patients (12%). PSA decline ≥50% occurred in three patients (12%). Six patients (24%) achieved stable disease for >6 months. At a median follow-up of 43.6 months, median rPFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9 to 5.7), and median overall survival was 28.1 months (95% CI: 14.5 to 37.3). Post-treatment evaluation of the bone microenvironment revealed transcriptional upregulation in myeloid and neutrophil immune subset signatures and increased expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints.ConclusionsTremelimumab plus durvalumab was safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone, with potential activity in a small number of patients as measured by rPFS. Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade with therapies targeting the myeloid compartment or other inhibitory immune receptors may be necessary to overcome mechanisms of resistance within prostate bone microenvironment.Trial registration numberNCT03204812.

scholarly journals Cabazitaxel for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Retrospective Data Analysis from an Indian Centre

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 506-515
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vamshi Krishna Muddu ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Kumar Prabhash
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Retrospective Data Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Named Patient Programme

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients from the named patient programme (NPP) at our centre. Methods: mCRPC patients who progressed on docetaxel were given cabazitaxel intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Overall survival, progression-free survival, prostate-specific antigen response, quality of life (QOL) changes, and safety were reported. Results: Nine men received cabazitaxel (median: 7 cycles; range: 1–27) under the NPP and were followed until death. Median survival was 14.07 months (1.07–23.80) and progression-free survival was 2.67 months (1.07–20.27). QOL was stable for most patients. Common adverse events (grade ≥3) were neutropenia (n = 8), anaemia (n = 4), and leucopenia (n = 4). Conclusion: These data from 9 patients are consistent with the results reported in the TROPIC study with a manageable safety profile.

scholarly journals A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. E47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Joseph Khalaf ◽  
Claudia M. Avilés ◽  
Arun A. Azad ◽  
Katherine Sunderland ◽  
Tilman Todenhöfer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression

Introduction: Recently, a prognostic index including six risk factors (RFs) (unfavourable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS], presence of liver metastases, short response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists/ antagonists, low albumin, increased alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) was developed from the COUAA- 301 trial in post-chemotherapy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Our primary objective was to evaluate this model in a cohort of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone.Methods: We identified 197 chemotherapy-naive patients who received abiraterone at six BC Cancer Agency centres and who had complete information on all six RFs. Study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), time to PSA progression, time on treatment, and overall survival (OS). PSA RR and survival outcomes were compared using Χ2 test and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify RFs independently associated with OS.Results: Patients were classified into good (0‒1 RFs), intermediate (2‒3 RFs), and poor (4‒6 RFs) prognostic groups (33%, 52%, and 15%, respectively). For good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, PSA RR (≥50% decline) was 60% vs. 42% vs. 40% (p=0.05); median time to PSA progression was 7.3 vs. 5.3 vs. 5.0 months (p=0.02); and median OS was 29.4 vs. 13.8 vs. 8.7 months (p<0.0001).Conclusions: The six-factor prognostic index model stratifies clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome is important for informing clinical practice and clinical trial design.

Low-Dose Docetaxel Combined with Dexamethasone Is Feasible for Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Chemotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyoshi Miura ◽  
Nozomu Tanji ◽  
Yutaka Yanagihara ◽  
Terutaka Noda ◽  
Seiji Asai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gastric Bleeding ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Analgesic Agents ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: Docetaxel-based chemotherapy against castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has recently been shown to be effective and tolerable. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose docetaxel in combination with dexamethasone. Methods: Thirty-seven CRPC patients were administered a treatment regimen consisting of 50 mg/m2 docetaxel once every 3-4 weeks and 1 mg dexamethasone daily at our institution, between November 2004 and April 2014. Results: Twenty-four patients (65%) had a decrease in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >50%. The median overall survival (OS) and PSA progression-free survival were 26.2 and 10.0 months, respectively. Ten of 12 patients (83%) taking analgesic agents reduced their intake because of decreased pain levels. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 patients (5%). Nonhematological toxicities were less frequent but sometimes severe. Treatment-related death occurred in 2 octogenarian patients, 1 due to gastric bleeding and the other due to infective endocarditis. Conclusion: Low-dose docetaxel in combination with dexamethasone is feasible in Japanese CRPC patients. Hematological toxicity is less than that seen with standard docetaxel therapy, but it is necessary to monitor patients for severe nonhematological toxicities, particularly very elderly patients.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of First-Line Treatments for Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haofeng Zheng ◽  
Jialiang Chen ◽  
Wenhan Qiu ◽  
Sijie Lin ◽  
Yanxiong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Castration Resistant

Recently, several drugs have been introduced for the first-line treatment of chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but few studies have compared treatment outcomes directly. This indirect comparison among 10 clinical trials (n= 4870 patients) retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration, and ClinicalTrails.gov was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and sipuleucel-T for the initial treatment of mCRPC. No significant differences in primary outcome (overall survival) were found among initial treatments. However, docetaxel had the highest probability (37.53%) of being the most effective, but at the cost of more adverse events, while enzalutamide was associated with the best secondary outcomes (prostate-specific antigen response, progression-free survival, quality of life, and adverse event profile). Thus, docetaxel is recommended as the first agent used for the chemotherapy of mCRPC, while enzalutamide is recommended as the first nonchemotherapy treatment. Additional clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and establish the optimal order for multidrug treatment of mCRPC.

Comparison of enzalutamide and bicalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Number needed to treat to achieve one additional patient free of clinical progression events.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Lawrence Ivan Karsh ◽  
David F. Penson ◽  
Raoul Concepcion ◽  
Scott Flanders ◽  
Bruce A. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Progression ◽  
Free Psa ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression

228 Background: Androgen receptor inhibitors enzalutamide (ENZA) and bicalutamide (BIC) are used to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The Phase 2 STRIVE trial included 35% non-metastatic (m0) and 65% metastatic CRPC patients (pts); ENZA reduced the risk of progression or death among pts, with an adverse event profile consistent with previous trials. The objective of this analysis was to compare ENZA with BIC using the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve one additional pt with m0CRPC, with either a progression-free survival (PFS) event, radiographic PFS (rPFS), or free of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression at 1 year and 2 years. Methods: The 1- and 2-year event rates of PFS, rPFS, and progression-free PSA among pts treated with ENZA and BIC were obtained from the STRIVE trial report. The NNT was calculated as the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction between ENZA and BIC at each time point. This represents the number of pts that need to be treated with ENZA, compared with BIC, to obtain one additional pt free of a clinical progression event. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to investigator-assessed radiographic (bone or soft tissue) progression, PSA progression, or death. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the NNT was derived based on the 95% CI of the event rate difference. Results: The NNT to achieve one additional pt with PFS at 1 year, comparing ENZA with BIC, was 2.2 (95% CI 1.7, 3.4), suggesting that treating three pts with ENZA instead of BIC would result in one additional pt free of progression or death at the end of 1 year. The NNT to achieve one additional pt with PFS at 2 years was also 2.2 (95% CI 1.5, 3.7). For rPFS, the NNTs comparing ENZA with BIC were 4.7 (95% CI 2.8, 14.6) and 3.0 (95% CI 2.0, 6.1) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. For progression-free PSA, the NNTs were 2.0 (95% CI 1.5, 2.8) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.4, 3.3) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis supports the superior clinical benefit of ENZA versus BIC in men with m0CRPC. Pts treated with ENZA showed low NNT values across all clinical outcomes and time points. Clinical trial information: NCT01664923.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document