Social capital and status attainment

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-82
Author(s):  
Michel Forsé

Recent email exchange through INSNA listserv (Borgatti 1998) points to Hanifan as the first author to use explicitly the term 'social capital' in 1920. He saw it as an essential feature of social groups. Jacobs in 1961 and Hannerz in 1969 follow. Then we find more contemporary researchers such as Loury (1977), Coleman (1988), Fukuyama (1995) and Putnam (1995). They underscore the collective facet of social capital. It is an clement of the group culture, with a broad definition that entitles it to cover even entire societies, because it is closely related to trust and reciprocity norms among members.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Behtoui

This paper addresses the impact of social capital on the status attainment process of young people at the start of their careers and examines how social class, gender and ethnicity affect the accumulation of social capital and thereby labour market stratification of young people. A sample of young Swedes graduating from vocational schools and universities between 2005 and 2006, was surveyed via the telephone about their experiences acquiring jobs. Two research questions are posed: (i) Which characteristics (class, gender and ethnicity) affect young people's access to more social capital? (ii) How is social capital rewarded in the labour market? The results show that being female, coming from the lower social classes and being a member of a stigmatized immigrant groupare associated with a substantial social capital deficit. When socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds as well as the human capital of respondents are controlled, social capital is positively associated with salary level. The results indicate that social capital is a significant factor in the stratification process of young people.


2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 203-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadzli Baharom Adzahar

According to Granovetter, weak ties link individuals to other social circles that place them in strategic positions to gain access to job information and opportunities otherwise not available in their innate networks. This paper affirms that weak ties, as a form of social capital, matter and that they assist in explaining variations in status attainment between ethnic groups in Singapore. I show that access to weak ties affects status attainment differently across ethnic groups and that the Malay’s weaker performance in the labour market is partly due to their lower access to weak ties. This paper would be of interest to scholars concerned with the intertwining of social stratification with social capital and ethnicity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document