Vygotsky and the Conceptual revolution in Developmental Sciences: Towards a Unified (Non-Additive) Account of Human Development

2012 ◽  
pp. 145-161

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-333
Author(s):  
Sam Brewitt-Taylor

AbstractThis article argues that British historiography's secularization debate is largely misconceived, being enmeshed in secular ideological assumptions inherited from the West's secular revolution of the 1960s. It therefore introduces an alternative, postsecular paradigm for understanding British secularization, which conceptualizes secularity as an ideological culture in its own right, religion as secularity's othering category, and secularization as the positive dissemination and enactment of secularity. British Christianity declined gradually from around 1900, but widespread secularization in this positive sense could only happen once British public discussion had embraced secularity's ideological framework, which it did in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Before the mid-1950s, British discussion had routinely adhered to a “Christian civilization” metanarrative, which insisted that “religion” is essential to long-term social stability, such that “secularization” is a regrettable step backward in human development. Yet in the late 1950s and early 1960s British discussion abruptly embraced secularity's rival metanarrative, which states that “religion” is a primordial condition unnecessary in “advanced” societies, such that “secularization” is an irreversible step forward in human development. This conceptual revolution was contingent, culturally specific, and importantly influenced by radical rereadings of Christian eschatology. Nonetheless, it created both the secular revolution of the 1960s, and the ideological framework within which the British secularization debate continues to be conducted today.





Author(s):  
Martha C. Nussbaum
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
Tania Zittoun ◽  
Jaan Valsiner ◽  
Dankert Vedeler ◽  
Joao Salgado ◽  
Miguel M. Goncalves ◽  
...  


2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria José Sotelo ◽  
Luis Gimeno

The authors explore an alternative way of analyzing the relationship between human development and individualism. The method is based on the first principal component of Hofstede's individualism index in the Human Development Index rating domain. Results suggest that the general idea that greater wealth brings more individualism is only true for countries with high levels of development, while for middle or low levels of development the inverse is true.



1971 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 787-788
Author(s):  
JOHN M. MCDAVID
Keyword(s):  


1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1029-1030
Author(s):  
Wendy L. Haight
Keyword(s):  


1974 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 747-747
Author(s):  
E. MAVIS HETHERINGTON
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document