Interview With Judge Anna Maria Wesołowska, Regional Court Judge, the Judiciary of the Republic of Poland

2021 ◽  
pp. 276-296
Author(s):  
Ewa M. Guzik-Makaruk ◽  
Aleksandra Stachelska
Keyword(s):  
Court Judge ◽  
The Republic

scholarly journals Tugas dan Wewenang Komisi Yudisial Jawa Timur dalam Pengawasan Hakim Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-306
Author(s):  
Nur Lailatul Musyafaah
Keyword(s):  
Court Judge ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
To Receive

Abstract: The duty of the East Java Regional Judicial Commission in the supervision of a corruption court judge is to receive community reports and court monitoring. The court monitoring was conducted on two matters, court monitoring based on community reports and on the initiative of the East Java Judicial Commission. The authority of the East Java Regional Judicial Commission in the supervision of a corruption judge is only authorized to receive reports, annotations, inspections and monitoring of the court session. The observation, examination, and proposal of sanction are done by Central Judicial Commission. In a juridical perspective, the duties and authorities of the East Java Judicial Commission on the judges of corruption crime have been in accordance with Article 20 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 in 2011 on Amendment to Law Number 22 in 2004 concerning Judicial Commission. Keywords: East Java Judicial Commission, Judges, Corruption. Abstrak: Tugas Komisi Yudisial Penghubung Wilayah Jawa Timur dalam pengawasan hakim pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi adalah menerima laporan masyarakat dan pemantauan persidangan. Adapun wewenang Komisi Yudisial Penghubung Wilayah Jawa Timur dalam pengawasan hakim tindak pidana korupsi adalah Komisi Yudisial Penghubung Wilayah Jawa Timur hanya berwenang menerima laporan, anotasi, pemeriksaan dan melakukan pemantauan persidangan. Adapun pengamatan, pemeriksaan, pengusulan sanksi dilakukan oleh Komisi Yudisial Pusat. Dalam perspektif yuridis, pelaksanaan tugas dan wewenang Komisi Yudisial Penghubung Wilayah Jawa Timur terhadap hakim pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial. Kata Kunci: Komisi Yudisial Penghubung Wilayah Jawa Timur, Hakim, Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MENANGANI KASASI PERKARA KARTEL PUTUSAN KPPU YANG MENGGUNAKAN ALAT BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG (INDIRECT EVIDENCE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-101
Author(s):  
Fransiska Lestari Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Republic

Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an institution authorized to handle unfair business competition violation. In fact, in several KPPU decisions it was revealed that KPPU prioritizes indirect evidence in handling cartel cases in Indonesia. KPPU's decision is not final and binding. Business actors who do not accept the decision of KPPU may file an objection at the District Court. The parties who do not accept the decision of the district court, may file an appeal in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The type of research is used in this research is normative legal research, that is research done by reviewing the rules of law applicable or applied to a certain legal problem. The result of the research shows that in the Supreme Court appeal, KPPU's decision was upheld and canceled by Supreme Court to KPPU's decision uses indirect evidence in handling cartel case. The basis of consideration of the Supreme Court Justices ruling the KPPU's decision in the case of the tire cartel and the cement cartel is the Chief Justice accepting and acknowledging the indirect evidence as valid evidence, since the evidence is sufficient and logical evidence, and there is no evidence the more powerful that can weaken the indirect evidence. While the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge overturning the KPPU's decision in the case of cartel fuel surcharger is not accepting and acknowledging indirect evidence as valid evidence, because the evidence is insufficient and illogical, and there is stronger evidence that can weaken the tool indirect evidence

scholarly journals Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia dalam Menciptakan Hakim Agung Yang Berkualitas dan Berintegritas

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Muslim Mamulai
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Kajian ini untuk mengkaji eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesa dalam menciptakan hakim agung yang berkualitas dan berintegritas. Metode peneltia yang digunaka menggunakan metode peneltian hukum normatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 24B ayat (1) UUD 1945 mengalami dinamika dan perubahan dalam penafsiran baik pada tingkat legislasi di DPR, ajudikasi di Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung, maupun pada tingkat regulasi di Mahkamah Agung dan Komisi Yudisial.Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial mengusulkan pengangkatan hakim agung telah mengalami perluasan makna mencakup hakim ad hoc di Mahkamah Agung serta penguatan dengan dihapuskan kewenangan DPR untuk memilih calon hakim agung dan hanya menyetujui atau tidak menyetujui calon hakim agung usulan Komisi Yudisial. This study is to study the existence of the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia in creating high-quality judges with integrity. The research method used uses normative legal research methods. The results showed that the authority of the Judicial Commission as referred to in Article 24B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution experienced dynamics and changes in interpretation both at the legislative level in the DPR, adjudication in the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court, as well as in the Supreme Court and Judicial Commission. The existence of the Judicial Commission proposing the appointment of a Supreme Court judge has broadened the meaning including ad hoc judges in the Supreme Court and strengthened by abolishing the authority of the DPR to elect candidate judges and only approving or not approving candidates for the proposed Judicial Commission.

scholarly journals Kedudukan dan Efektivitas Justice Collaborator di dalam Hukum Acara Pidana

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-256
Author(s):  
Adi Syahputra Sirait
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Analysis Instrument ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Illicit Trafficking

This article aims to analyze and explain the position of justice collaborator in criminal procedural law and the effectiveness of justice collaborator in proof, as an analysis instrument this research uses a case study of a narcotics-specific criminal decision in the Supreme Court where narcotics is an extraordinary crime committed in an organized manner by a drug syndicate narcotics, this research uses a social legal research approach using juridical type, the research data is obtained from an analysis of the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 920K / Pid.Sus / 2013 which is then analyzed using the effectiveness theory. The Supreme Court Judge determines the defendant as a justice collaborator based on the Supreme Court circular number 4 of 2011 regarding the treatment of whistleblowers and witnesses of collaborating actors (justice collaborator). The results of this study are that the supreme court judge considered the defendant's petition as a justice collaborator who could reveal the illicit trafficking network of international channels and also reveal the main perpetrators of the narcotics distribution.

Time and Latitude in South Africa

1972 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
J. Hers
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Cape Town ◽  
Astronomical Observations ◽  
Royal Observatory ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Astronomical Determination ◽  
Limited Accuracy ◽  
Better Than

In South Africa the modern outlook towards time may be said to have started in 1948. Both the two major observatories, The Royal Observatory in Cape Town and the Union Observatory (now known as the Republic Observatory) in Johannesburg had, of course, been involved in the astronomical determination of time almost from their inception, and the Johannesburg Observatory has been responsible for the official time of South Africa since 1908. However the pendulum clocks then in use could not be relied on to provide an accuracy better than about 1/10 second, which was of the same order as that of the astronomical observations. It is doubtful if much use was made of even this limited accuracy outside the two observatories, and although there may – occasionally have been a demand for more accurate time, it was certainly not voiced.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document