Modern state security

Author(s):  
Manu Lekunze
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Trudy Fraser

The ‘rebuilding’ of a society in the aftermath of conflict or mass violence often subsumes the dynamic requirements of human security into a technical task that belies or fails to fully comprehend the needs of the community being ‘built’. Indeed, as Trudy Fraser in Chapter Ten explains, critics have suggested that ‘building’ in the aftermath of conflict merely serves to impose externally configured normative benchmarks as a panacea for peace, privileging the goals of international actors at the expense of local actors. One of the main problems is that externally configured normative benchmarks do not necessarily conform to local models of peace and security. In order for the ‘building’ to be reflective of the dynamic requirements of human security, this chapter asserts that it must be responsive to the following questions: (1) who is doing the building?; (2) what is being built?; and (3) for whom is it being built? These three questions speak to separate but interrelated issues in the context of modern state-, peace- and nation-building, and highlights the ambiguity that currently exists between the initial (state-security-centric) and subsequent (human-security-centric) phases of intervention and ‘(re-)building’.


2021 ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
RADOSLAV GAĆINOVIĆ

In this paper author underlined the importance of judicial and inspection bodies in formation of the capacity of security of modern state. It is known that the judiciary bodies have a very important role in protection of the constitutionality and legality of the state, because successful functioning of judicial system significantly contributes to formation of the capacity of security. It is very important that within the process of their own functioning the judicial authorities cooperate with the state security system. In certain situations functioning of the judicial system must be coordinated with the functioning of the security system, because neither the court nor the prosecutor’s office can solve the problems without the facts that they may find only in cooperation with the modern state security bodies. Such cooperation is necessary also in case of prevention function, because the judiciary bodies of the modern states also have a preventive role. In addition, the inspection services also significantly contribute to raising of the security system to a higher level by supervision of proper implementation and compliance to the law by citizens, working organizations and other kind of organizations. This supervision is exercised through inspections which function on all levels and have general and special authority powers.


Author(s):  
Mark Finnane

The public police is an inseparable part of the modern state, and the origins and development of the ideas of police, policing, and their institutional locations have been the subject of considerable historical debate over the last four decades. This essay reviews the historiography of modern policing, which can be divided into three strands. The first has aimed to revise earlier accounts identifying modern civil policing as the legacy of Robert Peel’s London Metropolitan Police. The second has highlighted the importance of an earlier European conception of policing as a comprehensive government of populations. The third has been preoccupied with the origins, function, and diffusion of militarized gendarmerie-style policing, closely identified with state security and French prerevolutionary police innovations. This essay further examines how these approaches have been closely linked to contemporary debates about the powers, functions, and governance of the modern public police.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 113-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Lubiewski

These considerations have been devoted to fundamental issues directly related to the functioning of the modern state, i.e. security and the inseparable threat concept, as well as the state’s potential in this respect included in the security system. Due to the editorial framework, only a general signaling of the problem was possible, although it allowed the intentional signaling of its most important aspects. The complexity of the problems related to the functioning of the modern state in an extremely complicated international security environment still does not allow the possibility to precisely define the conceptual framework of the term state security. It seems that this quality is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future given the increasing complexity of social relations over time, not only in the area of a single country, but also in a global context at an international level. This will undoubtedly affect the increasingly high level of complexity in the formation of the state security system. Among others for these reasons constant analyses are required by the issue of state security and the resources, procedures and instruments assigned to it, in the form of a state security system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document