Role Morality

2020 ◽  
pp. 96-102
Author(s):  
Cara Biasucci ◽  
Robert Prentice
Keyword(s):  
Role Morality

scholarly journals Moscow Doesn’t Believe in Tears: A Matter of Gender and Fate

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Laia Perales Galán
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Political Context ◽  
The State ◽  
Power Dynamics ◽  
Female Characters ◽  
Domestic Sphere ◽  
Gender Dynamics ◽  
Role Morality ◽  
The Soviet Union

This paper offers an in-depth review of the Soviet hit film Moscow Doesn’t Believe in Tears (1979). Focusing on its female characters, it analyses the gender dynamics that prevailed in the Soviet Union at that time and the narrative impact it had on the plot. The article is divided into three subsections: a brief historical and political context, a depiction of the state of gender equality in the Soviet Union, as well as the power dynamics that existed both in the professional and domestic sphere, and a summary of the different femininities portrayed by the characters, along with the role morality and fate played in the film.

scholarly journals Humanitarian Communication Through the Lens of Feminist Ethics of Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-36
Author(s):  
Houda Houbeish
Keyword(s):  
Common Ground ◽  
Ethics Of Care ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Ethical Framework ◽  
Feminist Ethics ◽  
Role Morality ◽  
Humanitarian Ethics ◽  
The Common

Ethics are the driving force of the humanitarian field, a domain that has been governed by general and universal ethical principles. Researchers have largely focused on studying the organizational commitment to these principles, paying less attention to the role-specific ethics of this field. Moreover, researchers who consider the humanitarian field from a media studies lens have often focused on media representation, while questions about communication as practice are sidelined. In this paper, I approach humanitarian ethics with a particular focus on role morality and communication practices. With a particular focus on the role of a humanitarian communications specialist, I argue, in this paper, that the feminist ethics of care is a useful ethical framework that can guide communication specialists to better practices when they are in the field of operation. I also answer the following research questions: What are the main ethical principles that humanitarian communication specialists are expected to observe as humanitarians? Why are these principles insufficient? How might feminist ethics of care fill the gap left by current humanitarian principles and what would be the added value of this framework for practicing humanitarian communication? To answer, I ground my approach in an experiential understanding built from my personal experience as a humanitarian communications specialist. Second, I offer a literature review to highlight the common ground between humanitarian ethics and the feminist ethics of care and the added value of the feminist ethics of care why applied by humanitarian communication specialists. Third, I provide some examples of communications practices that may follow the feminist ethics of care model.  

Legal ethics

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Tur
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Applied Ethics ◽  
Legal Ethics ◽  
Role Morality ◽  
The Third ◽  
Integral Element ◽  
Principles And Standards ◽  
Set Up

Legal ethics can be considered from at least three related viewpoints. First, as ‘professional ethics’, it is a corpus of rules, principles and standards, often embodied in a written code and disseminated, applied and enforced by appropriate governing bodies as a guide to the professional conduct of lawyers. Legal professions set up specific institutions and officers to monitor and assist practitioners and to accumulate experience and expertise in applying detailed provisions in morally complex situations. For some commentators this is primarily regulation or administration and not ethics at all, but for others it is ethics in action or ‘applied ethics’. ‘Applied ethics’ is the second aspect of legal ethics, distinguished from ethics in general by the focus on ethical issues in the context of legal practice, including confidentiality, conflict of interest or acting for a morally disreputable client. Interesting though such questions may be in themselves, some writers do not acknowledge that they are truly questions of ethics, because the duties and privileges of specialist functional groups generally and lawyers in particular are not universalizable. For others, including some feminist ethicists, the ‘agent as such’ does not exist and we all encounter moral difficulties and problems, if we encounter them at all, only in the context of some specific relationship or role, for example in the role of a lawyer. Legal ethics thus requires an analysis of role morality. The third aspect of legal ethics is as an integral element in general philosophical and legal education.

scholarly journals Philosophical Legal Ethics: An Affectionate History

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Luban ◽  
W. Bradley Wendel
Keyword(s):  
Third Wave ◽  
Behavioral Ethics ◽  
Legal Ethics ◽  
Legal Representation ◽  
Role Morality ◽  
Modern Subject ◽  
The Subject ◽  
1960S And 1970S ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Second Wave

30 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 337 (2017)The modern subject of theoretical legal ethics began in the 1970s. This brief history distinguishes two waves of theoretical writing on legal ethics. The “First Wave” connects the subject to moral philosophy and focuses on conflicts between ordinary morality and lawyers’ role morality, while the “Second Wave” focuses instead on the role legal representation plays in maintaining and fostering a pluralist democracy. We trace the emergence of the First Wave to the larger social movements of the 1960s and 1970s; in the conclusion, we speculate about possible directions for a Third Wave of theoretical legal ethics, based in behavioral ethics, virtue ethics, or fiduciary theory.

Virtue-Based Psychiatric Ethics

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Radden
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Moral Psychology ◽  
Mentally Ill ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Professional Role ◽  
Psychiatric Practice ◽  
Role Morality ◽  
Ethical Approach ◽  
Severely Mentally Ill

Psychiatric practice with those who are severely mentally ill calls for an ethical approach that builds on, but goes beyond, the biomedical principles applicable to all medical sub-specialties including psychiatry. Although it may not be the only answer for the specific ethical demands of the psychiatry setting, a character-focused ethics fits psychiatric practice particularly well. Features of virtues that explain this fit are outlined here: their nature as composite and heterogenous habits that involve mental attitudes, and affections; possess a complex moral psychology; are partialist and role specific; and includephronesis. In the professional role morality underlying virtue approaches, goals of practice can themselves become role constituted virtues, it is shown, so that the distinction between clinical skills and virtues collapses. And some of the implications of these observations for medical education are noted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document