Abstaining from voting in union certification elections

2019 ◽  
pp. 249-261
Author(s):  
C. Gail Hepburn ◽  
Catherine A. Loughlin ◽  
Julian Barling
ILR Review ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert G. Heneman ◽  
Marcus H. Sandver

This paper reviews the large body of literature examining the outcomes of NLRB certification elections. The authors first review the major patterns of the research conducted to date and then analyze twenty-nine studies in depth. These studies exemplify the range of methodologies used and results obtained within each of the two major kinds of election studies: those analyzing data gathered from individual voters and those analyzing NLRB data on election units. The review concludes with an appraisal of the current state of research on election outcomes and with policy recommendations for labor, management, and government representatives.


ILR Review ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Bronfenbrenner

Analyzing 1986–87 data from 261 NLRB certification election campaigns, the author finds that union tactic variables explain more of the variance in election outcomes than any other group of variables, including employer tactics, bargaining unit demographics, organizer background, election background, employer characteristics, and election environment. The results suggest that unions can significantly improve the probability of winning an election by using a rank-and-file intensive organizing strategy. This strategy includes a reliance on person-to-person contact; an emphasis on union democracy and representative participation; the building of support for the first contract during the organizing drive; the use of escalating pressure tactics; and an emphasis on dignity, justice, and fairness rather than on bread-and-butter issues.


1993 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-199
Author(s):  
Jeanette A. Davy ◽  
Frank Shipper

ILR Review ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 733-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emin Dinlersoz ◽  
Jeremy Greenwood ◽  
Henry Hyatt

What types of businesses attract unions? The study develops a theory of union learning and organizing to provide an answer to this question. A union monitors the productivity of establishments in an industry and uses this information to decide which ones to organize. An establishment becomes unionized if the union wins a certification election, the outcome of which can be influenced by costly actions taken by the two parties. The model offers predictions on the nature of union selection, which are examined empirically. Data on union certification elections, matched with data on establishment characteristics, are used to explore where union activity is concentrated.


1993 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor G. Devinatz ◽  
Daniel P. Rich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document