Absolute or Conditional Prohibition of the Use of Atomic Weapons?

Author(s):  
Elis Biörklund
Keyword(s):  
1971 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 836-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph I. Coffey

On March 5, 1970, the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) went into effect, having been ratified by 47 states including the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The treaty legally bars these three nuclear powers from transferring atomic weapons to nonnuclear states and formally pledges those nonnuclear states signing the treaty to refrain from developing such weapons or acquiring them from other powers. It thus caps a long effort by the United States to inhibit—so long as it could not preclude—the spread of nuclear weapons and to avoid the potential instabilities associated with that spread.


1957 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Speier

The uncertainty about whether atomic weapons will be used in future war, whether local or general, lends itself to political exploitation in the cold war. The efficiency of nuclear weapons in wartime, and their resulting threat-value in either war- or peacetime, constitute their political-military worth. In peacetime, the threat-value of weapons can be exploited in many ways: by an ultimatum, by authoritative or inspired statements on capabilities or intentions, by studied disclosures of new weapons at ceremonial occasions, by means of maneuvers, redeployments of forces, or by so-called demonstrations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Petra Kiss

Since August 1945 atomic weapons have become significant factors in international relations, every state with great ambitions has aspired to get atomic secrets. The primary goal of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) created in 1949 was – possessing the United States’, a nuclear power’s, security guarantee – to deter the Soviet agression. The first strategic documents of the Alliance were written with this very purpose. However, in the 1950s there was a shift in the allied nations’ policies, which influenced NATO’s strategic thinking as well, so in 1957 a real different strategic concept was adopted. Gaining technological superiority became the most important goal, which led to development and intense production of nuclear weapons. This article examines the emerging role of nuclear weapons and the changing strategy of the Alliance between 1949 and 1957.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
David Lilienthal ◽  

We are entering a whole new era of life . . . there are two sides to technological knowledge—good and evil . . . I'm concerned about the extraordinary power of [atomic] weapons and the strain they impose on humanity . . . when it comes to this deadly technology, we follow people who are mad, because people who are sane and understand the democratic process haven't taken charge. . . . The first part of the "Atoms for Peace" was great . . . there was an exchange of information about the medical use of isotopes, the agricultural use of tracers, the physical properties of matter . . . then they started sending things—devices, fuels—instead of ideas, and these became a major export . . .—it's a nightmare.


Author(s):  
William L. Graf

Plutonium occurs throughout the earth’s environmental systems, though usually in quantities so small that they are barely detectable. Because this artificial element is so toxic, it is necessary to identify those few locations where the concentrations are likely to be the highest. Because almost all plutonium released into the environment is ultimately attached to soil and sediment particles, the behavior of constantly changing natural transport systems such as water and sediment flows provide the key to understanding the ultimate geographic disposition of the element. The general purpose of the work discussed in this book is to explain the distribution of plutonium in the Northern Rio Grande system of northern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado by forging a link among the available data and general principles of environmental sciences such as hydrology, geomorphology, and radioecology. Between 1945 and 1952, Los Alamos National Laboratory handled large amounts of plutonium as part of the Manhattan Project (the effort to construct the first atomic weapons) and as part of the weapons programs related to the early years of the cold war. During this time, the laboratory emptied untreated plutonium waste into the alluvium of Los Alamos Canyon. After 1952, the laboratory released relatively small amounts of treated plutonium waste. Although the vertical movement of plutonium through the alluvial materials has been largely limited to the upper 10 m,4 the horizontal movement of the contaminants has had much larger dimensions. The plutonium was adsorbed onto sedimentary particles, and so the fate of those sediments is also the fate of the plutonium. Natural processes of erosion have resulted in substantial movement of contaminated sediments through the canyons. Research during the 1960s and early 1970s showed that since the war years, surface flows within the laboratory’s boundaries had redistributed at least some of plutonium. Laboratory researchers later estimated that fluvial (river-related) processes in Los Alamos Canyon had probably removed significant quantities from the laboratory area by carrying the plutonium into the Rio Grande. They predicted that early in the twenty-first century almost all of the plutonium would have been emptied from Los Alamos Canyon into the Rio Grande.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document