Constructivist and Sociocultural Theories of Learning

2020 ◽  
pp. 35-49
Author(s):  
Russell Tytler ◽  
Joseph Ferguson ◽  
Peta White
2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pelin Gul ◽  
Tom R. Kupfer

Benevolent sexism (BS) has detrimental effects on women, yet women prefer men with BS attitudes over those without. The predominant explanation for this paradox is that women respond to the superficially positive appearance of BS without being aware of its subtly harmful effects. We propose an alternative explanation drawn from evolutionary and sociocultural theories on mate preferences: Women find BS men attractive because BS attitudes and behaviors signal that a man is willing to invest. Five studies showed that women prefer men with BS attitudes (Studies 1a, 1b, and 3) and behaviors (Studies 2a and 2b), especially in mating contexts, because BS mates are perceived as willing to invest (protect, provide, and commit). Women preferred BS men despite also perceiving them as patronizing and undermining. These findings extend understanding of women’s motives for endorsing BS and suggest that women prefer BS men despite having awareness of the harmful consequences.


2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Beals

Vygotsky's social psycholinguist approach is not incompatible with computational approaches to the study of mind. In this way William Frawley sets the stage for a Vygoskyan cognitive science. Socioculturalists' theorizing on the work of the human mind has long maintained boundaries against cognitive science's information processing approaches and language, and vice versa. Frawley argues that no such division is entirely necessary and offers powerful ways of linking the two ways of thinking. Frawley's background in both Vygotskyan and other sociocultural theories, as well as in cognitive science and computational theories, places him in an important position to make these links.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-52
Author(s):  
Patricia E. Enciso

As literacy scholars, we continually engage with the ongoing politics of imagination in everyday life across silenced histories and uncertain futures. In this article, I draw on sociocultural theories and philosophies of imagination as well as narrative and global discourse theories to argue that literacy research, in the context of social inequality, depends on our capacity to imagine otherwise and to tell and listen to stories without colonizing what is unknown and unfamiliar. I illustrate the consequences of (im)mobilizing imagination, and the effort to speak and be heard despite inequalities, by telling stories from my family’s history and by analyzing youth conarrations of their cross-cultural lives.


Author(s):  
Rheanna N. Ata ◽  
Lauren M. Schaefer ◽  
J. Kevin Thompson

Author(s):  
Mazlina Che Mustafa ◽  
Abdul Halim Masnan ◽  
Azila Alias ◽  
Nor Mashitah Mohd Radzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document