Writing for Scholarly Publication

2021 ◽  
pp. 244-262
Author(s):  
Zhihui Fang
1983 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Charles W. Dunn

Why is authorship of a textbook generally considered less of a scholarly contribution than authorship of a “scholarly” publication, such as a journal article or a university press book?Certainly both are needed, but is it right for a political science department to reward faculty who author “scholarly” publications more than those who author textbooks?Whether stipulated in the criteria for departmental evaluation of faculty performance or in other less overt ways, the bias is prevalent throughout our discipline.This essay states five reasons why the bias should not exist: 1) ignorance of impact, 2) ignorance of values, 3) ignorance of the review process, 4) ignorance of purpose, and 5) ignorance of time and Scope.


1966 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Lewis

These seven recent works typify a cross section of scholarly publication on the Chinese People's Republic, its history, present operation, and prospects. Taken together, they provide the basis for some remarks on the study of Chinese “political culture.” Rather than attempt a full review of the individual works, this brief article will examine some of their assumptions and indirectly comment on the literature they represent. Each book reflects a prodigious scholarly effort and has received in various other journals a complete appraisal of its intellectual value. In general it may be fairly said that these volumes do not constitute significant breakthroughs of knowledge. They do, however, bring together and analyze important bodies of data on Communist China.


1978 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 275-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind B. Brooke ◽  
Christopher N. L. Brooke

St Clare died on II August 1253, and the celebration of her seventh centenary in 1953 was accompanied by a revival of scholarly interest in her life and work scarcely to be paralleled since the Bollandists passed through August. Grau established the canon of her writings and published an annotated German translation: Hardick fixed the chronology of her life—born in 1193-4, received into the religious life at the age of 18 in 1212; from 1212 to 1253 head and leader (from 1216 abbess) of the community in San Damiano. Much else occurred besides in 1953 in scholarly publication and popular festivity; and little perhaps remains to be discovered about her life and works.


2021 ◽  
pp. 290-295
Author(s):  
D. M. Feldman

The collection prepared by IMLI RAN contains letters of the eminent specialist in local history N. Antsiferov and focuses on the biography of this St. Petersburg Imperial University alumnus, who, despite many arrests by the Soviet regime on trumped-up charges, incarceration in prisons and guarded camps and exile, preserved his inner freedom and, therefore, his scholarly potential. The book details the political context that brought about the outrageous persecution of this highly skilled and staunchly apolitical scholar aswell as the abrupt clearance of charges. Also included is a summary of his scholarly output in literary history, local history and cultural studies. The book lists the scholar’s acquaintances and correspondents, e. g., M. Bakhtin, V. Vernadsky, M. Lozinsky, A. Meyer, K. Chukovsky, B. Eichenbaum, and many other members of the intellectual elite. The book is celebrated as a landmark scholarly publication; highly praised are the text preparation efforts and explanatory notes.


Author(s):  
Shantanu Kumar Rahut ◽  
Razwan Ahmed Tanvir ◽  
Sharfi Rahman ◽  
Shamim Akhter

The paper reviewing process evaluates the potentiality, quality, novelty, and reliability of an article prior to any scholarly publication. However, a number of recent publications are pointing towards the occurrence of the biasness and mistreatments during the progression of the reviewing process. Therefore, the scientific community is involved to standardize the reviewing protocols by introducing blind and electronic submission, selecting eligible reviewers, and supporting an appropriate checklist to the reviewers. The amplification of reviewing with decentralization and automation can solve the mentioned problems by limiting the possibility of human interaction. This chapter proposes and implements a decentralized and anonymous paper reviewing system (DJournal) using blockchain technology. DJournal eliminates all the trust issues related to the reviewing process but improves reliability, transparency, and streamlining capabilities with up-gradation of the machine learning-based reviewer selection approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document