On Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State

2017 ◽  
pp. 283-296
Author(s):  
A. Javier Treviño
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Hans Kelsen ◽  
Theory Of Law

On Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State

2017 ◽  
pp. 231-244
Author(s):  
A. Javier Treviño
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Hans Kelsen ◽  
Theory Of Law

General Theory of Law and State. Hans Kelsen

Ethics ◽  
1947 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-215
Author(s):  
Gustav Bergmann
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Hans Kelsen ◽  
Theory Of Law

THEORY OF LAW AND COMPUTER CRIMESTEORIA DO DIREITO E CRIMES INFORMÁTICOS

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agata C. Amato Mangiameli (Universidade de Roma – Tor Vergata)
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Social Engineering ◽  
Computer Crimes ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
Technology Advances

This paper aims investigate the general theory and the elements of the computer crimes as well it social engineering, because as technology advances, more and more people use it according to their needs.

Kelsen – Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
JÖRG KAMMERHOFER
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Pure Theory ◽  
Municipal Law ◽  
Hans Kelsen ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Legal Theorist

AbstractHans Kelsen is known both as a legal theorist and as an international lawyer. This article shows that his theory of international law is an integral part of the Kelsenian Pure Theory of Law. Two areas of international law are analysed: first, Kelsen's coercive order paradigm and its relationship to the bellum iustum doctrine; second, the Kelsenian notion of the unity of all law vis-à-vis theories of the relationship of international and municipal law. In a second step, the results of Kelsenian general legal theory of the late period – as interpreted and developed by the present author – are reapplied to selected doctrines of international law. Thus is the coercive order paradigm resolved, the unity of law dissolved, and the UN Charter reinterpreted to show that the concretization of norms as positive international law cannot be unmade by a scholarship usurping the right to make law.

LEGAL STATUS OF THE SOLE EXECUTIVE BODY OF A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulia Fanilevna Aitova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Executive Body

The article analyzes the issue of determining the legal status of the individual management body of a limited liability company. The author begins his research with the concept of legal status existing in the general theory of law, and then proceeds to consider the issue from the point of view of philosophical categories. In addition, the work explores the diversity of points of view existing in the doctrine regarding the legal status of the individual management body of economic societies.

scholarly journals Hans Kelsen, the Theory of Law and the International Legal System: A Talk

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Bobbio ◽  
D. Zolo
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
System A ◽  
Hans Kelsen ◽  
International Legal System ◽  
Theory Of Law

scholarly journals There Are No Easy Counterexamples to Legal Anti-Positivism

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad H. Atiq
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Social Philosophy ◽  
Social Practices ◽  
Legal Rule ◽  
False Negatives ◽  
Moral Properties ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
Inclusive Form ◽  
Moral Facts

Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, ForthcomingLegal anti-positivism is widely believed to be a general theory of law that generates far too many false negatives. If anti-positivism is true, certain rules bearing all the hallmarks of legality are not in fact legal. This impression, fostered by both positivists and anti-positivists, stems from an overly narrow conception of the kinds of moral facts that ground legal facts: roughly, facts about what is morally optimific — morally best or morally justified or morally obligatory given our social practices. A less restrictive view of the kinds of moral properties that ground legality results in a form of anti-positivism that can accommodate any legal rule consistent with positivism, including the alleged counterexamples. I articulate an ‘inclusive’ form of anti-positivism that is not just invulnerable to extensional challenge from the positivist. It is the only account that withstands extensional objections, while incorporating, on purely conceptual grounds, a large part of the content of morality into law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document