Integrated Provision: Bringing Together Social Care and Primary Health Care

Author(s):  
David Challis ◽  
John Chesterman ◽  
Rosemary Luckett ◽  
Karen Stewart ◽  
Rosemary Chessum
1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 592-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sube Banerjee ◽  
James Lindesay ◽  
Elaine Murphy

Recent changes in the provision of health and social care in the UK such as the institution of a purchaser/provider system and regular screening of the elderly by GPs are of importance to the relationship between primary health care teams (PHCT) and psychogeriatricians. These changes have clarified the necessity for sensitivity by psychogeriatric services to the needs of GPs and commissioning authorities.


Community child health includes disability, social paediatrics, general paediatrics, and health promotion. It involves close working with children’s services from education and social care, as well as the primary health care team. Within a given area, a child may have contact with a variety of professionals, varying according to the child’s needs. Multidisciplinary and multi-agency working is essential in order for the child’s and family’s needs to be effectively met.


1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Hudson ◽  
Brian Hardy ◽  
Melanie Henwood ◽  
Gerald Wistow

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Ândrea Cardoso Souza ◽  
Francisco Javier Uribe Rivera

This study it consists of a bibliographical research based on a qualitative approach. This assay took into consideration the commitment of one of the proposals approved by the III National Conference of Mental Health, to consolidate the mental health care in the sphere of the Primary Care, and also considering that mental health practices are focusing a on territorial basis. The inclusion of the actions of mental health in the Primary Care has widened the field of Psycho-social Care, and has promoted the development of technologies of care guided by the notion of responsibility (accountability), promotion of interpersonal bonds and commitment with the mental health care. All of them, through daily work, look for the objective of integral care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uday Narayan Yadav ◽  
Jane Lloyd ◽  
Kedar Prasad Baral ◽  
Narendra Bhatta ◽  
Suresh Mehta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Nepal are not receiving adequate support to self-manage their chronic conditions, and primary health care can play a key role in the effective management of these. In this study, we aimed to develop a model of care, using a co-design approach, for delivering evidence-based biomedical and psycho-social care to support self-management for people with multi-morbid COPD in rural Nepal. Methods A co-design approach, guided by the five stages of the design thinking model, was used for this study. Layering on “empathize” and “define” phases, we ideated a model of care that was further refined in a “prototype” stage, which included a series of consultative meetings and a 1-day co-design workshop with stakeholders. This co-design process involved a wide range of stakeholders from Nepal, including people with COPD and their families, community representatives, local government representatives, primary care practitioners, community health workers, policymakers, state-level government representatives and academics. Results Through our co-design approach, a model of integrated care for delivering evidence-based biomedical and psycho-social care to support self-management for people with multi-morbid COPD was designed. The integrated model of care included: screening of the community members aged > 40 years or exhibiting symptoms for COPD and management of symptomatic patients within primary health care, establishing referral pathways for severe cases to and from secondary/tertiary-level health care and establishing a community-based support system. It involved specific roles for community health workers, patients and their caregivers and community representatives. It was built on existing services and programmes linking primary health care centres and tertiary-level health facilities. Conclusion The co-design approach is different from the currently dominant approach of rolling out models of care, which were designed elsewhere with minimal community engagement. In our study, the co-design approach was found to be effective in engaging various stakeholders and in developing a model of care for rural Nepal. This grassroots approach is more likely to be acceptable, effective and sustainable in rural Nepal. Further research is required to test the effectiveness of an integrated model of care in delivering self-management support for people with multi-morbid COPD in rural Nepal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document