Tribal College and University Leadership

Author(s):  
Ginger C. Stull ◽  
Marybeth Gasman
Author(s):  
Jennifer Dengate ◽  
Renée Hoffart ◽  
Tracey Peter ◽  
Annemieke Farenhorst ◽  
Tamara Franz-Odendaal

Using a sample of women natural sciences and engineering (NSE) faculty members from 13 Canadian universities, we investigated the impact of women academic leaders on women professors’ perceptions of gender bias. Logistic regression analyses indicated that professors who perceived more workplace gender bias were more likely to feel that they needed to work harder to be seen as legitimate scholars than those who perceived less gender bias. However, professors who perceived that women were better represented amongst their faculty/college and university leadership were significantly less likely to feel that they needed to work harder for legitimacy than those who perceived greater gender bias in leadership. These results suggest that addressing gendered university hierarchies may moderate the impact of gender bias on women in NSE units.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Dawn Lyken-Segosebe ◽  
John M. Braxton

Vice chancellors of public universities in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region face a myriad of challenges that require research- and data-driven decision-making. This paper presents a decision-making model for college and university leadership - The Two-Way Practitioner-Researcher Loop. This scholarship of practice has the twin goals of developing a knowledge base for college and university leadership and improving leadership practice in the university. The scholarship of practice comprises two “loops”. In the practitioner-to-researcher loop, vice chancellors develop practitioner-defined research agenda to be researched internally by Departments of Institutional Research and externally by members of Higher Education research communities. In the researcher-to-practitioner loop, research findings are communicated back to vice chancellors for immediate application to institutional planning, policy formulation, and decision making. This scholarship of practice develops a knowledge base comprised of both “knowledge for practice” and “knowledge in practice” at the level of university leadership. To build capacity for vice chancellors to craft research agenda and questions emanating from their “knowledge in practice”, we identify internal mechanisms and external associations, training programmes and other forums that provide leadership development and support for these university executives.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 180-195
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Kostelecky ◽  
David A. Hurley ◽  
Jolene Manus ◽  
Paulita Aguilar

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 901-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Fahrenwald ◽  
Christine Belitz ◽  
Arliss Keckler

“Tribes Sharing Life” is an educational intervention about deceased organ donation for American Indian Tribal College and University (TCU) students. The classroom and web-based program was derived from cultural values and beliefs, and the Transtheoretical Model. The aim of this study was to develop and formatively evaluate the intervention for acceptability and satisfaction among advisory council members ( n = 10) and TCU students ( n = 22). Council evaluation results were strong. All items met the <3.0 mean acceptability criterion using an intervention materials review form. Content validity indices met criterion of 0.80 overall and for each item. Dialogue among tribal advisors led to culturally based changes in the images that portrayed the need for organ donation. TCU student evaluation of the revised intervention resulted in overall mean scores that met criterion for acceptability and satisfaction. Tribes Sharing Life is a formatively evaluated intervention that should undergo efficacy testing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document