Institutional interplay D

2010 ◽  
pp. 125-126
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Interplay

'Totally Un-Australian!': Discursive and Institutional Interplay in the Melbourne Port Dispute of 1997-98*

2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1729-1760 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Selsky ◽  
Andre Spicer ◽  
Julian Teicher
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Interplay

Institutional Interplay between the Chiang Mai Initiative and the International Monetary Fund

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-67
Author(s):  
Howard Loewen
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
International Monetary Fund ◽  
Forum Shopping ◽  
International Institution ◽  
Chiang Mai ◽  
Institutional Interplay ◽  
Regime Complex ◽  
The International Monetary Fund

This paper argues that the emergence and implementation of an international institution can only be fully understood if it is seen as part of a larger regime complex. It analyses the establishment of the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMI), a regional financial arrangement in East Asia, by focusing on its interplay with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It will be argued that four factors play a major role in the CMI’s interactions within the financial regime complex: the lack of a clean slate, forum shopping, legal inconsistencies and the politics of implementation.

Afterword

2020 ◽  
pp. 213-218
Author(s):  
Mei Zhan
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Cultural Context ◽  
Science And Technology Studies ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
The State ◽  
The West ◽  
Institutional Interplay ◽  
Point Of Entry ◽  
Analytical Point ◽  
State And Market

This chapter reviews the collective exploration into the entanglements of science and technology, the state, the market, and everyday life in contemporary China. The chapter presents a compelling argument for why it is critical, at this particular moment, for anthropologists to step in and make their accounts and analyses of science in/of/and China relevant to academic and public discussions and debates. It emphasizes that China is not a place outside of the West where “usual science” proliferates and changes its forms in a non-Western national or cultural context. Rather, the translocal sociohistorical formation and the complex conceptual and institutional interplay of state, market, and technoscience shaping and shaped by post-Mao, post-socialist, and now Xi's authoritarian China demand thoughtful and experimental ethnographic engagement on the ground. The chapter also invokes governmentality as an analytical point of entry into the enmeshments of science, state, and market and as a way to forge a conversation with topics central to science and technology studies (STS) literatures.

Marine Biodiversity and Institutional Interplay

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALF HAKON HOEL
Keyword(s):  
Marine Biodiversity ◽  
Institutional Interplay

scholarly journals A society ill-equipped to deal with the effects of climate change on cultural heritage and landscape: a qualitative assessment of planning practices in transport infrastructure

2021 ◽  
Vol 166 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Antonson ◽  
Philip Buckland ◽  
Roger Nyqvist
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Climate Change Impacts ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Adaptation Measures ◽  
Institutional Interplay

AbstractThis paper provides insights into the handling of climate change issues related to cultural heritage at different government decision levels dealing with physical planning, and in particular roads. Data are derived from a qualitative analysis of official reports and interviews with local and regional planners in three Swedish regions with contrasting climates. The theoretical lens of Institutional Interplay is applied to an analysis grouped into six themes: Climate threats to cultural heritage, Adaptation measures, Preparedness, Institutional preconditions, Institutional interplay, and Challenges. The results suggest that despite a strong environmental reputation internationally, Sweden is not particularly well prepared for dealing with future climate change impacts on cultural heritage and landscape. The lack of national standards and standardised methods risks regional and sectoral variation in the treatment of similar tasks, a problem which deficiencies in knowledge and continuing education are perpetuating. The degree to which discussions and cooperation occur between divisions within the same authority, between authorities, and in national networks varies considerably. Routines and criteria for prioritisation of cultural heritage mitigation, essential under conditions of limited resources, have yet to have been implemented. We conclude with five recommendations for improving the planning process with respect to climate change risks to cultural heritage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document