scholarly journals The effects of assistive products in Korean long-term care insurance system for the beneficiary older adults

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 126-138
Author(s):  
Tae-Bum Lee ◽  
Hyun-Sook Chang
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Nakagawa ◽  
Taiji Noguchi ◽  
Ayane Komatsu ◽  
Masumi Ishihara ◽  
Tami Saito

Abstract Background In Asia, where autonomous decision-making is not well accepted, little is known about whether and how individuals’ preferences are considered when deciding where they receive care. This study examined the longitudinal association of aging-in-place preference when bedridden with institutionalization among Japanese older adults. Methods We analyzed nationally representative data of 1,290 community-dwelling older adults aged 70 and above, applying the multiple imputation method. Baseline data were collected in 1999, shortly before the long-term care insurance system was introduced. The outcome was measured as self- or proxy-reported years of institutionalization over seven years. The explanatory variable was the aging-in-place preference. Participants were asked about their desired place of care (facility, home, or other) when bedridden. Covariates were sociodemographic and health-related factors. We used Cox proportional hazards models and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association of aging-in-place preference when bedridden with institutionalization. Results Seventy-eight respondents (6.0%) were institutionalized during the follow-up period. Compared to individuals preferring to reside in long-term care facilities when bedridden (48.7%), those preferring to stay in their homes (39.6%) were less likely to be institutionalized, even after adjusting for relevant covariates (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.27–0.79 for model 1 including residential status; HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.27–0.76 for model 2 including marital status and co-resident children). Conclusions Our findings suggest that individuals’ aging-in-place preferences are considered under the long-term care insurance system. Individuals’ preferences should be shared by families and clinicians when deciding the place of care.


1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Kitajima

This study attempted to estimate the valuation of Long-term care (LTC) insurance system among the residents in a municipality in Tokyo by applying the Willingness to Pay (WTP) approach. The mean WTP for Group one (those aged 65 and over) and Group two (those aged between 40 and 64) was estimated to be 13, 305 Japanese Yen and 8, 722 Japanese Yen, respectively. Both amounts exceed the contribution estimated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (2, 500 Japanese Yen). The result reflects a high expectation for the system especially among those in Group one. It also suggests that those in Group one may be able to shoulder more financial responsibility for the system. Further research on WTP for LTC insurance system is deemed beneficial for its successful management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document