The future of national corporate law systems

Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
pp. 85-154
Author(s):  
Carsten Gerner-Beuerle ◽  
Michael Schillig

This chapter begins with an overview of the nature and effects of EU law and the EU law-making process, with particular focus on the internal market. This is followed by an analysis of the acquis unionaire—the EU law with company law relevance at both Treaty level and the level of secondary legislation (regulations and directives). It emphasizes the trajectory of EU company law and its development in distinguishable ‘waves’. It then turns to the issue of corporate mobility within the Union, on the basis of the Court’s case law on freedom of establishment, as well as the emerging EU law infrastructure for corporate mobility transactions. The chapter concludes with some speculation about the future of EU company law in the light of Brexit.


Author(s):  
Vikramaditya S. Khanna

This chapter examines fiduciary principles in Indian law. Fiduciary duties, such as those owed by corporate directors, trustees, agents, and lawyers, are commonplace in India. However, there are contexts in India where the fiduciary duties appear unusual. A particularly important example of this are the duties owed by the person (called the Karta) who manages the affairs of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). These duties differ from those seen in the more common types of fiduciary relationships and raise a number of interesting questions for greater exploration. This chapter first provides an overview of fiduciary duties in India that are common across many parts of the world, focusing on agency law, trust law, and corporate law. It then explains what the Karta and the HUF are, how the HUF holds property akin to a joint tenancy, how it operates, how it can be created and terminated, how it compares to the pater familias of ancient Rome, and what areas of Indian law impact its continued existence. The chapter then explores the duties owed by the Karta to people within the HUF, along with other legal rules and practical considerations that operate to police the Karta’s behavior in ways that supplement his or her limited fiduciary duties. Finally, the chapter closes with how the Karta’s duties raise some interesting questions about the growth and development of fiduciary principles that might be fruitfully explored in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 257-273
Author(s):  
Luca Enriques

This essay argues that, to address the Covid-19 crisis, in addition to creating a special temporary insolvency regime, relaxing provisions for companies in the vicinity of insolvency, and enabling companies to hold virtual meetings, policymakers should tweak company law to facilitate equity and debt injections and address the consequences of the extreme uncertainty firms are facing. After some general reflections upon the type of rules that are needed in these exceptional times, examples of temporary corporate law interventions for the emergency are provided. Specifically, rules to facilitate injections of equity capital and shareholder loans are suggested, together with relaxations of directors’ liability rules and measures to protect firms against hostile takeovers. All of these measures should apply merely by default and only for so long as the emergency lasts. The essay concludes with some thoughts about how to make normal-times corporate law ready for similar emergencies in the future. The goal is both to reduce the risk that the temporary extreme measures enacted for this crisis are made permanent under the pretence that another crisis may hit again and to have quick adaptation mechanisms already in place to respond to such a crisis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document