scholarly journals Hospitals, field hospitals, community isolation centers, and finally home isolation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 03-04
Author(s):  
Wiwatana Tanomkiat

Unlike the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand which were limited among certain populations in certain areas, the third wave starting in April 2021 spread nationwide. It was from less than 10 new cases a day in 2020, to be around 2,000 a day in June and then more than 20,000 new cases a day in August 2021. Among four doctors who were killed by COVID-19 during this third wave in Thailand, the Royal College of Radiologists of Thailand lost a very active and warm member, Associated Professor Wilaiwan Bhothisuwan. When hospitals and field hospitals were full, now COVID-19 infected patients were cared in community isolation centers. Home isolation, the last and probably the final form of health care, was set in this August. The Royal College of Radiologists of Thailand had launched a project “RadioVolunteer” to interpret and report chest radiographs of COVID-19 patients in prisons, field hospitals where there were shortage of radiologists, some community isolation centers, and radiographic units for patients with home isolation.

Curationis ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.H. Muller

A quarter of a century ago Mr Harold MacMillan delivered his famous Winds o f Change speech in Cape Town. In 1975 Dr. Wolff Bodenstein, in delivering a paper on primary health care, referred to the storms o f change. Now, a decade later, John Naisbitt speaks of megatrends when elaborating on change on a worldwide scale from an industrial society to an informational society. Alvin Toffler’s widely read The Third Wave speaks of similar trends on a scale comparable to the agricultural revolution and the industrial revolution.


2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (Suppl1) ◽  
pp. W420-W431 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. McDonough ◽  
Brian Rosman ◽  
Fawn Phelps ◽  
Melissa Shannon

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-398
Author(s):  
Maryna Klimanska ◽  
Larysa Klymanska ◽  
Inna Haletska

Aim. Identification and construction of the typology of attitudes of health care professionals in Ukraine to the current COVID-19 situation and vaccination process. Methods. Transcripts of 49 semi-structured interviews subjected to thematic analysis constituted the subject matter of the analysis. On the basis of the categories identified within the thematic analysis process, a typology was developed, with due account of two parameters: the idea about the origin of the virus: artificial or natural, and the attitude of the informants to the policy (implementation of policy decisions) chosen by the authorities to fight the virus. Combination of these two parameters gives four standpoints—types of attitude of health care professionals to the risks associated with COVID-19. Results and conclusion. Analysis of the results has enabled to outline the problem field for assessing the risk of COVID-19, which includes three topics, as well as to point out four typical standpoints in the attitude displayed by health care professionals that are marked as “magical thinking,” “technological thinking,” “negativistic thinking,” “critical thinking.” Originality. The research was conducted during the third wave of coronavirus in Ukraine, therefore, it reflects the analysed opinions of health care professionals about the threat of COVID-19 and vaccination process. The fact that the research was performed using qualitative methods ensured focusing on subjective peculiarities of the perception of changes in the COVID-19 situation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 721-730
Author(s):  
Khin Phyu Pyar ◽  
Sai Aik Hla ◽  
Soe Min Aung ◽  
Di Wunn ◽  
Zar Ni Htet Aung ◽  
...  

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), emerged in China at the end of 2019, became a major threat to health around the world. Breakthrough infection following COVID-19 vaccine has clinical and public health significance. The highest groups at risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic is health care workers; the physicians are the frontline workers. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of breakthrough COVID-19 infection and their clinical presentation, co-morbidities and outcome among physicians who were fully vaccinated, working in COVID-19 treatment centers in Myanmar. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among physicians, at least 14 days after receiving second dose, working at COVID-19 treatment centers in Myanmar, during the third wave from end of May to August 2021. Data were collected by using standardized forms and analysis was done. Results: Among 410 physicians, 98.2% (221/225) received two dose of vaccination: Covaxin 90.0%, Covishield 9.5% and Sputink V 0.5%. They received first dose of vaccine in January/February 2021 and second dose in March/April 2021. In Myanmar, third wave started in end of May; the largest pandemic surge had reached its peak in July, 2021. In the third wave, most of them 72.9% (161/221) did not experience no infection. The prevalence of fully vaccinated break through infection was 27.1% (60/221); the majority 78.3% (47/60) were mild symptomatic infection. Severe infection was seen in 10% of physicians with breakthrough infection who required hospital admission and oxygen therapy. The common presenting symptoms in order of frequency were body aches and pain 62.6%, sneezing 56.6%, headache 53.5%, cough 52.5%, sore throat 45.5%, anosmia 33.3%, runny nose 23.2% and loose motion 27.3%. The uncommon symptoms were dyspnoea 9.1%, vertigo 6.1%, skin rash 5.1%, vomiting 5.1%, petechiae 3.0%, tinnitus 3.0% and silent hypoxia 3.0%, and non-per-os 1%. Most of them did not have any significant comorbidities. One out of six physicians having severe infection had diabetes mellitus and two were obese. The mean duration of hospital stay was 7 days. None of the cases was fatal. Conclusions: In this study, over 98% of physicians were fully vaccinated; majority with Covaxin. One in four physicians had breakthrough infection in third wave; mainly mild form. Nearly half of them had possible delta symptoms; aches and pain, sneezing, runny nose, headache, cough, and sore throat. Awareness of rare but important symptoms like Non-per-Os and vertigo should be highlighted both to public and health care personnel. Ten percent of physicians with breakthrough infection were severe. Mortality rate was zero.


Author(s):  
Тетяна Семигіна ◽  
Вікторія Тимошевська ◽  
Тетяна Степурко

This paper is aimed to present how people respond to some innovationsintroduced within the Ukrainian health care system by legislation adopted in2017. It is focused on issues of choosing family doctors and on perception ofe-health by population.The survey “Health Index. Ukraine” has been launched in 2015 by theInternational Renaissance Foundation, School of Public Health of NationalUniversity of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy and Kyiv International Institute ofSociology. In 2018, the questions on primary health care reform (choosingthe primary health care provider, perception of e-health) were added tothe research instrument of “Health index. Ukraine”. This paper analysesdata collected in 2018 only, because the users’ experience of choosing familydoctor and perception of e-health variables are available for 2018 datasolely. The third wave of the survey took place in June - July 2018 and overall10219 respondents were interviewed in Ukraine.At the moment of the third wave of survey, 42% of respondents reportedthat all their household members including themselves had their declarationssigned with family doctors, 5.8% reported that some of their householdmembers had their declarations signed, and 52.2% more informed that noneof their household members had his/her declaration signed. Households withchildren were more active: 52% of them had their declarations signed withdoctors. 12.4% of household representatives reported that do not plan tochoose a family doctor. 59.5% of respondents reported that they did notexperience problems in the process of choosing a family doctor.There is no significant difference in rates of declarations signing betweendifferent type of areas, education levels, and health self-assessment status.Regional difference in signing declarations (self-reported) by all householdmembers reaches up to 52.4%.The survey results demonstrate that patients want their medical recordsto be visible by different doctors (29.9%) and by patients themselves (28.9%),and only 19.8% believe the e-health instrument is not necessary at all. Thoseself-assessing their health as very bad or bad are three times more criticalabout the electronic system as those self-assessing their health as very good.


Hypatia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Orr
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document