scholarly journals Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Tingkat III Program Studi Diploma Tiga Keperawatan Terhadap Lingkungan Pembelajaran Klinik di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Panti Rapih Yogyakarta

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-57
Author(s):  
Bernadetta Eka Noviati ◽  
Gabriella Andrea Pranata ◽  
Gaudensius Hengky Togand
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cronbach Alpha

Dalam dunia pendidikan keperawatan, pembelajaran klinik merupakan salah satu upaya untuk membantu mahasiswa dalam proses perubahan menjadi perawat yang profesional. Mahasiswa D3 Keperawatan merupakan perawat vokasi dengan pembelajaran teori 40 % dan pembelajaran klinik 60 %. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa tingkat III Program Studi Diploma Tiga Keperawatan terhadap lingkungan pembelajaran klinik di Rumah Sakit. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif pendekatan survey dengan teknik sampling menggunakan total sampling dengan jumlah 84 responden. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan instrumen baku (Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision And Nurse Teacher – Cles+T) yang dialih bahasakan oleh Puji Priyanti & Naharian(2016), uji validitas instrumen mengunakan PCA (Principal Component Analysis)dengan N=46, uji reliabiliti dengan Cronbach alpha, Hasil eigenvalue dan explanation percentage diperoleh 67%, maka dengan demikian instrumen tersebut dinyatakan valid dan reliable. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa mahasiswa Tingkat III Program Studi Diploma Tiga Keperawatan, sebagian besar menyatakan puas terhadap lingkungan pembelajaran klinik sebanyak 81 responden dengan presentase 96.4% dan sebagian kecil tidak puas sebanyak 3 responden dengan presentase 3,6%. Dengan demikian diharapkan institusi mengadakan evaluasi dan perbaikan secara terus menerus sehingga kepuasan pembelajaran klinik tercapai.  

scholarly journals SKALA EVALUASI LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR KLINIK, SUPERVISI DAN DOSEN PERAWAT (CLINICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT, SUPERVISION AND NURSE TEACHER – CLES+T) VERSI BAHASA INDONESIA: VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratna Puji Priyanti ◽  
Pepin Nahariani
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia

The practice of clinical learning is a bridge for gap between theory and practice. By learning practice clinics, nursing students are encouraged to prepare for graduate and worked in clinical practice. Evaluation of clinical learning environment needed to be able to create a conducive learning environment. CLES+T scale has been validated and used in more than 30 countries.The research aims is to validate the CLES+T scale into Indonesian version. CLES + T has been translated into Indonesian version using the rules of the international translation backward and forward. Construct validity using 4 oang experts in nursing and education. The SCVI result was 0.9405. Validity analysis was tested using PCA (Principal Component Analysis) with N = 46. Reliability tested using Cronbach's alpha. The results obtained eigenvalue and explanation precentage of 67%, it is concluded that the eigenvalue factors of CLES+T were sufficient. Cronbach alpha was obtained for 0786. CLES+T Indonesian version has been validated and can be used to evaluate learning environment as perceived by nursing students in Indonesia. 

Überprüfung eines Familien-Assessment-Instruments auf der Grundlage der Theorie des systemischen Gleichgewichts

Pflege ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Christina Köhlen ◽  
Marie-Luise Friedemann
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Screening Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Varimax Rotation ◽  
Cronbach Alpha

In diesem Beitrag wird die Überprüfung des Assessment-Instruments zur Einschätzung der Wirksamkeit familiärer Strategien (ASF-E) für die Anwendung in Deutschland und der deutschsprachigen Schweiz beschrieben. Das ASF-E ist ein Screening-Instrument für Familiengesundheit, wie sie in der Theorie des systemischen Gleichgewichts definiert ist (Friedemann, 1991). Zunächst wurde das Instrument in den frühen 1990er Jahren in der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung kultureller Unterschiede ins Deutsche übersetzt. Die vorliegende Testung war die erste in Deutschland und die zweite in der Schweiz. Das Instrument hatte ursprünglich 26 Items, wobei jedes drei Aussagen beinhaltet, die Familienstrategien ausdrücken und von denen die Probanden dasjenige auswählen sollten, das am ehesten auf ihre Familiensituation zutrifft. Die Aussagen sind von 1 bis 3 gestaffelt, wobei der Wert 3 für optimale, zufrieden stellende Gesundheit steht. In Deutschland wurde das Instrument von 343 und in der Schweiz von 209 Befragten aus der Gemeinde ausgefüllt, die sowohl unterschiedlichen Alters als auch unterschiedlicher ökonomischer Herkunft waren. Eine Principal Component Analysis mit Varimax Rotation brachte vier Faktoren mit einem Eigenwert > 1 hervor. Acht Items mussten herausgenommen werden, da sie eine unzureichende Verteilung oder zu schwache Faktorladungen aufwiesen. Das endgültige Assessment-Instrument hat 18 Items mit einem akzeptablen Wert für Reliabilität (Cronbach Alpha). Das ASF-E kann in Deutschland und in der Schweiz genutzt werden, um Forschung mit Familien zu begleiten und Familiengesundheit in Verbindung mit Pflegeinterventionen einzuschätzen.

Development and Testing of the Collaboration in the Clinical Learning Environment Tool

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-369
Author(s):  
Katie Hooven
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Nursing Education ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Principal Component Factor Analysis ◽  
Tool Development ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Education Practice ◽  
Expert Review

Background and Purpose: This study was done to develop and psychometrically test the Collaboration in the Clinical Learning Environment (CCLE) tool. The researcher acknowledged 2 distinct populations that required input into this particular tool development: staff nurses and nursing faculty members. Both have influence into student learning. Methods: Research followed the 8-step methodology for tool development as defined by DeVellis. Results: Reliability testing was done on the 24-item CCLE, which confirmed a Cronbach’s alpha of .96. Exploratory factor analysis with principal component factor analysis was done to examine the structure of the instrument. Validity was supported through the content expert review, along with concurrent validity. Conclusions: Although collaboration has been emphasized for many years in the clinical learning environment, the construct has never been successfully operationalized. Implications for nursing education, practice, and theory are discussed.

RANCANGAN INSTRUMEN PENGUKUR ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR DOSEN PERGURUAN TINGGI SWASTA DI JAKARTA

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-236
Author(s):  
Sri Hermawati ◽  
Lies Handrijaningsih ◽  
Titi Nugraheni
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Organizational Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Civic Virtue ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Cronbach Alpha ◽  
Total Item

Beberapa penelitian menunjukkan bahwa salah satu faktor yang ikut berperan dalam karier individu adalah Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB). OCB mengacu pada perilaku peran ekstra karyawan, yaitu perilaku yang bersifat sukarela dan melampaui ekspektasi peran normal. Berbagai penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberlakuan OCB memiliki dampak positif yang kuat pada berbagai hasil kerja individu. Mengingat peran dan dampak OCB dalam organisasi maka perlu disusun instrumen yang tepat untuk mengukur OCB. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menyusun instrumen pengukur OCB di kalangan dosen. OCB diukur dari lima dimensi yakni altruism, courtesy, conscientiousness, sportsmanship, dan civic-virtue. Uji reliabilitas dilakukan dengan melihat statistik Cronbach Alpha. Uji validitas ini menggunakan Content Validity Ratio. Validitas isi instrumen diperoleh dengan memberikan kuesioner yang dirancang kepada panelis yang terdiri dari pakar yang berkecimpung di dunia pendidikan dengan bidang psikologi dan manajemen. Pengujian validitas item sebagai pengukur variabel juga dilakukan dengan analisis Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Hasil uji PCA menunjukkan terbentuknya 10 variabel yang dapat digunakan untuk mengukur OCB di kalangan dosen. Total item pernyataan yang membentuk 10 variabel tersebut adalah 36 item pernyataan.

scholarly journals Physicians’ Attitudes toward Adolescent Confidentiality Services: Scale Development and Validation

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vida Jeremić Stojković ◽  
Smiljana Cvjetković ◽  
Bojana Matejić
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Cronbach Alpha ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
New Instrument

AbstractIntroductionConfidentiality is one of the oldest ethical principles in healthcare. However, confidentiality in adolescent healthcare is not a universally-accepted doctrine among scholars. The ethical acceptability of confidential services in adolescents’ healthcare is based on perceptions of adolescent maturity and an appreciation of its importance to adolescents’ access and utilization of healthcare services. Despite legal policies that promote adolescents’ rights, physicians’ attitudes toward adolescent confidentiality can be a determining factor in their ultimate decision to protect adolescents’ confidentiality.MethodA new Attitude towards Adolescent Confidentiality Scale was developed based on the results of a qualitative interview study. This new instrument was administered to a sample of 152 physicians working at school pediatric and gynecology departments in 13 primary healthcare institutions in Belgrade. Principal component analysis was applied to determine the main components of the scale. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach alpha and mean inter-item correlations.ResultsPsychometric analysis of the final 19-item version of the scale showed a high level of reliability (Cronbach alpha of 0.83). Principal component analysis showed four components, which present subscales of the instrument: Confidentiality in clinical situation, Iimportance of confidentiality, Adolescent maturity, and Communication with parents.ConclusionsThe instrument showed satisfactory levels of reliability and validity. The results of the scale dissemination may be a valuable tool for needs assessment for future educational interventions and training programs that will raise physicians’ awareness of the importance of adolescent confidentiality.

Cultivating critical thinking in the clinical learning environment

2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
LS Behar-Horenstein ◽  
TA Dolan ◽  
FJ Courts ◽  
GS Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment

A German version of the Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ): cultural adaptation and validation

VASA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirchberger ◽  
Finger ◽  
Müller-Bühl
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Intermittent Claudication ◽  
Completion Time ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
German Version ◽  
Average Completion Time ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Related Quality

Background: The Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) is a short questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). The objective of this study was to translate the ICQ into German and to investigate the psychometric properties of the German ICQ version in patients with IC. Patients and methods: The original English version was translated using a forward-backward method. The resulting German version was reviewed by the author of the original version and an experienced clinician. Finally, it was tested for clarity with 5 German patients with IC. A sample of 81 patients were administered the German ICQ. The sample consisted of 58.0 % male patients with a median age of 71 years and a median IC duration of 36 months. Test of feasibility included completeness of questionnaires, completion time, and ratings of clarity, length and relevance. Reliability was assessed through a retest in 13 patients at 14 days, and analysis of Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency. Construct validity was investigated using principal component analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating the ICQ scores with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) as well as clinical measures. Results: The ICQ was completely filled in by 73 subjects (90.1 %) with an average completion time of 6.3 minutes. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient reached 0.75. Intra-class correlation for test-retest reliability was r = 0.88. Principal component analysis resulted in a 3 factor solution. The first factor explained 51.5 of the total variation and all items had loadings of at least 0.65 on it. The ICQ was significantly associated with the SF-36 and treadmill-walking distances whereas no association was found for resting ABPI. Conclusions: The German version of the ICQ demonstrated good feasibility, satisfactory reliability and good validity. Responsiveness should be investigated in further validation studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document