Abdominal vascular injuries- what general/ trauma surgeons should know

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Zia Ur Rehman
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Haemodynamic Instability ◽  
Vascular Injuries ◽  
Operative Strategy ◽  
Endovascular Interventions ◽  
Abdominal Vascular Injuries

Abstract Abdominal vascular injuries are the common cause of death after abdominal trauma. These are challenging injuries to manage due to severe haemodynamic instability, associated injuries and difficulty in accessing and controlling these vessels. Early control of bleeding can decrease the mortality in these patients. Abdominal vasculature is divided in four zones and each zone need different operative strategy for exposure. Principles of proximal and distal control are followed before exploring any haematoma. Endovascular interventions (angioembolization, stent-graft) have shown improved outcomes in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta is minimal invasive method of achieving aortic occlusion and acts as bridge for definitive intervention or surgery. Updated knowledge is necessary for all those directly involved in managing these patients. The current review discusses relevant anatomy, principles, different surgical approaches and endovascular techniques to deal these injuries. Keywords: Abdominal trauma; injury; aorta; inferior vena cava. Continuous....

Endovascular Solutions for Iliac and Lower Extremity Junctional Injuries

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Edwin R Faulconer ◽  
Rachel M Russo ◽  
Anders J Davidson ◽  
Meryl A Simon ◽  
Erik S DeSoucy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Vascular Injuries ◽  
Endovascular Management ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Junctional Zone ◽  
Endovascular Interventions ◽  
Direct Pressure

Hemorrhage is the second leading cause of death in trauma and non-compressible torso hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death within this population. Vascular injuries to the pelvis and lower extremity junctional zone may be difficult to control with direct pressure and complex to approach with open surgery. Endovascular interventions such as balloon occlusion, stenting and embolization are potential alternatives or adjuncts to traditional open surgery in patients with blunt or penetrating vascular injuries to the pelvis. This review of the literature will outline contemporary endovascular management strategies for iliac and junctional zone injuries.

scholarly journals Avulsion Injuries of the Vena Cava Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma

1970 ◽  
Vol 171 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Waltck ◽  
R. W. Crow ◽  
L. J. Humphrey ◽  
H. M. Kauffman
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Vena Cava

Intra-abdominal Inferior Vena Cava Injuries: Operative Strategies and Outcomes

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482097339
Author(s):  
Christine A. Castater ◽  
Margo Carlin ◽  
Virginia D. Parker ◽  
Chris Sciarretta ◽  
Deepika Koganti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Volume Resuscitation ◽  
Vascular Injuries ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Hemorrhage Control ◽  
Operative Strategies

Visceral vascular injuries are relatively uncommon even in busy urban trauma centers. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is the most frequently injured visceral vein and can be a complex operative challenge. Despite advances in early volume resuscitation, improved transport times, prompt operative intervention, and hemorrhage control, mortality rates have remained largely unchanged. This article conducts an in-depth review of the literature surrounding IVC injuries and a detailed discussion of operative strategies and management as survivability is ultimately dependent on the grade of injury, location, and the presence of hemorrhagic shock.

Central venous pressure monitoring in critical care settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
Barry Hill ◽  
Catherine Smith
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Right Atrium ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Haemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
Haemodynamic Instability ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
The Right

Patients who present with acute cardiovascular compromise require haemodynamic monitoring in a critical care unit. Central venous pressure (CVP) is the most frequently used measure to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. It is most often done via a central venous catheter (CVC) positioned in the right atrium or superior or inferior vena cava as close to the right atrium as possible. The CVC is inserted via the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein or via the femoral vein, depending on the patient and their condition. Complications of CVC placement can be serious, so its risks and benefits need to be considered. Alternative methods to CVC use include transpulmonary thermodilution and transoesophageal Doppler ultrasound. Despite its widespread use, CVP has been challenged in many studies, which have reported it to be a poor predictor of haemodynamic responsiveness. However, it is argued that CVP monitoring provides important physiologic information for the evaluation of haemodynamic instability. Nurses have central roles during catheter insertion and in CVP monitoring, as well as in managing these patients and assessing risks.

A Case Series of the Use of Piezosurgery Instrument for Minimally Invasive Metopic Suturectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben G McGahan ◽  
Joravar Dhaliwal ◽  
Gregory D Pearson ◽  
Ibrahim Khansa ◽  
Annie I Drapeau
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Average Weight ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Metopic Suture ◽  
The Many ◽  
Single Suture ◽  
Metopic Craniosynostosis

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimal invasive suturectomy is one of the many surgical approaches to treat isolated single suture craniosynostosis. This approach can be technically challenging in metopic craniosynostosis given the narrow corridor and steep angle of the forehead. New instruments such as the Piezosurgery device (Mectron) have the potential to improve the ability to safely perform minimal invasive surgery in metopic craniosynostosis. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Piezosurgery technology in minimal invasive suturectomy for nonsyndromic metopic suture craniosynostosis and to describe our technique. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed of all the single metopic suturectomies performed at our single institution from March 2018 to November 2019. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected to assess the safety of Piezosurgery. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 12 patients with an average of 95.25 d old and an average weight of 6.2 kg. A total of 91.7% were male, and 91.7% were Caucasian. There were no intraoperative or postoperative Piezosurgery device-related complications in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION The use of the Piezosurgery instrument was safe in this cohort of minimal invasive metopic suturectomy. This device has greatly increased the ease of this procedure in our hands.

Trauma to the Abdomen and Pelvis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahir Basrai ◽  
Timothy Jang ◽  
Manuel Celedon
Keyword(s):  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Peritoneal Lavage ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Abdominal Organs ◽  
Fast Exam ◽  
Definitive Management ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Abdominal trauma accounts for approximately 12% of all trauma. The evaluation of abdominal trauma is difficult as the patient may have concomitant distracting injuries or alteration of mental status. As a result, a systematic approach to abdominal trauma is needed to ensure that life threatening injuries are not missed. The evaluation and management of abdominal trauma is directed by the Western and Eastern Trauma Association guidelines. Trauma to the abdomen is divided into two main categories, penetrating and blunt. The initial steps in management of both types are determined by the hemodynamic stability of the patient. Unstable patients with either pattern of injury are emergently taken to the operating room (OR) for exploration. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is being used at select trauma centers in unstable patients with abdominal trauma that are unresponsive to standard trauma resuscitation. For hemodynamically stable patient with penetrating trauma, recent data on selective non-operative management has shown promising outcomes. Patients with tenuous hemodynamics and blunt abdominal trauma are resuscitated with blood transfusions while being worked up by a Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam or deep peritoneal lavage (DPL). If the patient stabilizes further work up with labs and imaging is performed. Patients that remain tenuous should be taken to the OR. Hemodynamically stable patients with blunt trauma and evidence of peritonitis on exam can be evaluated with labs and imaging to assess for organ injury. Non- tender patients can be evaluated with labs and serial abdominal exams. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ injury scales are used to guide the definitive management of patients with intraabdominal injury. The Young-Burgess Classification System can be used to characterize pelvic fractures and to guide stabilization and definitive management. Tables demonstrate the AAST Injury Scales for the different abdominal organs. Images demonstrate the FAST exam and CT findings for different abdominal organs.   This review contains 14 figures, 6 tables and 48 references Key Words: Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating Trauma, Blunt Trauma, FAST exam, Liver Trauma, Splenic Trauma, Intestinal Trauma, Pancreatic Trauma, Diaphragmatic Trauma, Aortic Trauma, Pelvic Fracture, Deep peritoneal lavage, DPL, Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma, REBOA, Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta

scholarly journals Transorbital penetrating injury of the skull base and cavernous sinus - defining a minimal invasive treatment

2020 ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Bojan Jelaca ◽  
Djula Djilvesi ◽  
Papic Vladimir ◽  
Filip Pajicic ◽  
Milan Lepic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Cavernous Sinus ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Minimal Invasive Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Problem

Introduction. A transorbital intracranial injury with a foreign body can be a very complex and controversial therapeutic problem. The orbit's content is susceptible to penetrating trauma, and neurovascular skull base structures are at high risk from injury. There are some traditional cranial surgical approaches, and more recently reported different endoscopic approaches for treating this kind of injury. Case report. We present a case of a 30-year-old male who had an accident at work when a piece of wood hit him in his head and entered through the medial aspect of his left orbit with skull base and cavernous sinus injury. Rapid and complete radiological and clinical assessments were performed, and the patient was treated in a minimally invasive manner. The foreign body was manually extracted with an endoscopic and endovascular team ready to treat adverse events. No postoperative complications were reported, and visual acuity increased at one month follow up. Conclusion. Penetrating wounds of the orbit represent a challenge that requires a multidisciplinary assessment and well-organized management. Combined endoscopic minimally invasive approaches should be considered during the treatment of this kind of injury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document