scholarly journals Lancashire and South Cumbria New Hospitals Programme: once in a generation or generation gap?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 284-287
Author(s):  
Michael Lambert

The Lancashire and South Cumbria New Hospitals Programme (NHP) contends that the region has a ‘once in a generation opportunity’ to transform hospitals for 1.8 million local people by 2030. The NHP is the central pillar of a regional strategy developed by Lancashire and South Cumbria Health and Care Partnership (HCP), one of 42 Integrated Care Systems (ICS) constituted by the Conservative Government’s National Health Service (NHS) reform outlined in Integration and Innovation as the building block of services. The strategy envisions organising services as a ‘network’ comprising existing hospital sites and services as spokes which centre around a new world-leading hospital hub. However, rather than being ‘once in a generation’, this model mirrors exactly the intentions of the original architects of the NHS. The NHP is, in fact, a generation gap. The 2030 vision is the realisation of the model which planners conceived in 1948. This paper shows how the original 1948 model emerged and how, ultimately, it was rejected. The rejection was not due to clinical or service failings in the model, but to the rivalries and jealousies of hospitals, services, and universities. This history has several lessons for current health services leaders and the NHP.

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Newdick

Most now recognize the inevitability of rationing in modern health care systems. The elastic nature of the concept of “health need,” our natural human sympathy for those in distress, the increased range of conditions for which treatment is available, the “greying” of the population; all expand demand for care in ways that exceed the supply of resources to provide it. UK governments, however, have found this truth difficult to present and have not encouraged open and candid public debate about choices in health care. Indeed, successive governments have presented the opposite view, that “if you are ill or injured there will be a national health service there to help; and access to it will be based on need and need alone.” And they have been rightly criticized for misleading the public and then blaming clinical and managerial staffin the National Health Service (NHS) when expectations have been disappointed.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1032-1036
Author(s):  
Shirley Goodwin

Child health services in England and Wales are rendered largely through the National Health Service and Social Security. The activities of local authorities are also important to child health. The structure and scope of services offered children by each of these is presented and discussed, with special attention to changes anticipated during the next 2 years. The care of children is integrated into the system serving all ages, so that services are difficult to evaluate and resources are shared with other groups. Health policy for children is fragmentary, although encouraging trends are visible in the evolution of existing policy. The impact of impending changes in hospital, community, and general practitioner services on the care of children is unclear at this time.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Simpson

The current National Health Service (NHS) approach to commissioning health services is in flux. The purchasing of care from providers by general practitioner fundholders (GPFHs) and health authorities has changed with the new White Papers. GPFHs no longer exist and the commissioning role is being handed over from health authorities to primary care groups (PCGs). An understanding of the reasons for change and current arrangements will aid the consultant psychiatrist in influencing this process.


The benefits of a fully-digitalised public healthcare system are significant. Digital health is an essential tool in order to improve efficiency, provide coordinated care, and make real health improvements. However, the National Health Service (NHS) has yet to provide a fully digitalised system to patients and providers despite technological advances in recent years. This chapter will thus describe the progress which has already been made in providing remote health services within the NHS. It will also explore problems arising from digitalising health services and the management of health both within the institution and through more informal networks beyond the NHS.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 401-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Holloway

SummaryThe Health and Social Care Act 2012 brings in profound changes to the organisation of healthcare in England. These changes are briefly described and their implications for mental health services are explored. They occur as the National Health Service (NHS) and social care are experiencing significant financial cuts, the payment by results regime is being introduced for mental health and the NHS is pursuing the personalisation agenda. Psychiatrists have an opportunity to influence the commissioning of mental health services if they understand the organisational changes and work within the new commissioning structures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document