scholarly journals The influence of similarity-judgement after witness to lineup identification.

Author(s):  
Akinori Harada ◽  
Naoto Suzuki ◽  
Keita Ochi
1986 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 443-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Kato

The developmental sequence of recognition of shapes suggested by Piaget and Inhelder has been examined in cross-modal (touch-vision) and intramodal (vision-vision) conditions by using the method of similarity judgement. In the first condition, after factually exploring a standard shape, children from 4 to 6 yr. of age were asked to indicate which of two comparison shapes looked “most like” a standard shape possessing some features in common with either comparison. In the second condition, the procedure was the same as the first condition except that a standard shape was presented visually. Results showed that the number of topologically based responses decreased significantly with age in the touch-vision condition; however, there was no such tendency in the vision-vision condition. Also, the number of topologically based responses varied with the combination of shapes used.


Author(s):  
Joanna Pozzulo

This chapter discusses system variables that are under the control of the criminal justice system and can be manipulated after the crime has occurred, such as the type of lineup procedure shown to the eyewitness. The chapter first discusses recall memory and the different interviewing protocols and how these may interact with familiarity to influence an eyewitness’ memory of the perpetrator as well as the environment and event. Next, the chapter focuses on recognition memory, specifically lineup identification. The different lineup procedures used to collect eyewitness evidence are discussed, in addition to how each procedure may promote higher rates of accuracy and eyewitness confidence when a familiar-stranger is the perpetrator. Last, the chapter discusses unconscious transference and the commitment effect.


1994 ◽  
pp. 80-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Ross ◽  
Stephen J. Ceci ◽  
David Dunning ◽  
Michael P. Toglia

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 916-927
Author(s):  
Michael Greenstein ◽  
Nancy Franklin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario J. Baldassari ◽  
Kara N. Moore ◽  
Ira Hyman ◽  
LORRAINE HOPE ◽  
Eric Mah ◽  
...  

Research on eyewitness identification often involves exposing participants to a simulated crime and later testing memory using a lineup. We conducted a systematic review showing that pre-event instructions, instructions given before event exposure, are rarely reported and those that are reported vary in the extent to which they warn participants about the nature of event or tasks. At odds with the experience of actual witnesses, some studies use pre-event instructions explicitly warning participants of the upcoming crime and lineup task. Both the basic and applied literature provide reason to believe that pre-event instructions may impact eyewitness identification performance. In Experiment 1, we will test the effect of pre-event instructions on lineup identification decisions and confidence. Participants will receive non-specific pre-event instructions (i.e., “watch this video”) or eyewitness pre-event instructions (i.e., “watch this crime video, you’ll complete a line-up later”) and complete a culprit absent or present lineup. In Experiment 2, we will manipulate exposure duration and pre-event instructions to determine if pre-event instructions differentially impact high or low quality eyewitness events. If pre-event instructions impact eyewitness identification accuracy, then the findings of existing studies need to be considered in the context of their pre-event instructions and future work will be needed to determine how instructions interact with existing systems and estimator variables.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Elphick ◽  
Richard Philpot ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Avelie Stuart ◽  
Graham Pike ◽  
...  

Eyewitnesses to crimes sometimes search for a culprit on social media before viewing a police lineup, but it is not known whether this affects subsequent lineup identification accuracy. The present online study was conducted to address this. Two hundred and eighty-five participants viewed a mock crime video, and after a 15–20 min delay either (i) viewed a mock social media site including the culprit, (ii) viewed a mock social media site including a lookalike, or (iii) completed a filler task. A week later, participants made an identification from a photo lineup. It was predicted that searching for a culprit on social media containing the lookalike (rather than the culprit) would reduce lineup identification accuracy. There was a significant association between social media exposure and lineup accuracy for the Target Present lineup (30% more of the participants who saw the lookalike on social media failed to positively identify the culprit than participants in the other conditions), but for the Target Absent lineup (which also included the lookalike) there was no significant association with lineup identification accuracy. The results suggest that if an eyewitness sees a lookalike (where they are expecting to see the culprit) when conducting a self-directed search on social media, they are less likely to subsequently identify the culprit in the formal ID procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document