Anger in lineup identification and creation

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 916-927
Author(s):  
Michael Greenstein ◽  
Nancy Franklin
Keyword(s):  
Lineup Identification

Appearance-change instruction effects on eyewitness lineup identification accuracy are not moderated by amount of appearance change.

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Molinaro ◽  
Andrea Arndorfer ◽  
Steve D. Charman
Keyword(s):  
Identification Accuracy ◽  
Lineup Identification ◽  
Instruction Effects

Factors That Can Interact with Familiarity

2019 ◽  
pp. 55-76
Author(s):  
Joanna Pozzulo
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Eyewitness Confidence ◽  
Recall Memory ◽  
Unconscious Transference ◽  
Lineup Procedures ◽  
Lineup Identification ◽  
Lineup Procedure ◽  
System Variables

This chapter discusses system variables that are under the control of the criminal justice system and can be manipulated after the crime has occurred, such as the type of lineup procedure shown to the eyewitness. The chapter first discusses recall memory and the different interviewing protocols and how these may interact with familiarity to influence an eyewitness’ memory of the perpetrator as well as the environment and event. Next, the chapter focuses on recognition memory, specifically lineup identification. The different lineup procedures used to collect eyewitness evidence are discussed, in addition to how each procedure may promote higher rates of accuracy and eyewitness confidence when a familiar-stranger is the perpetrator. Last, the chapter discusses unconscious transference and the commitment effect.

Unconscious transference and lineup identification: Toward a memory blending approach

1994 ◽  
pp. 80-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Ross ◽  
Stephen J. Ceci ◽  
David Dunning ◽  
Michael P. Toglia
Keyword(s):  
Unconscious Transference ◽  
Lineup Identification

scholarly journals The Effect of Pre-Event Instructions on Eyewitness Identification Stage 1 Registered Report Manuscript

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario J. Baldassari ◽  
Kara N. Moore ◽  
Ira Hyman ◽  
LORRAINE HOPE ◽  
Eric Mah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Exposure Duration ◽  
Eyewitness Identification ◽  
Identification Accuracy ◽  
Identification Performance ◽  
Identification Stage ◽  
Lineup Identification ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Future Work

Research on eyewitness identification often involves exposing participants to a simulated crime and later testing memory using a lineup. We conducted a systematic review showing that pre-event instructions, instructions given before event exposure, are rarely reported and those that are reported vary in the extent to which they warn participants about the nature of event or tasks. At odds with the experience of actual witnesses, some studies use pre-event instructions explicitly warning participants of the upcoming crime and lineup task. Both the basic and applied literature provide reason to believe that pre-event instructions may impact eyewitness identification performance. In Experiment 1, we will test the effect of pre-event instructions on lineup identification decisions and confidence. Participants will receive non-specific pre-event instructions (i.e., “watch this video”) or eyewitness pre-event instructions (i.e., “watch this crime video, you’ll complete a line-up later”) and complete a culprit absent or present lineup. In Experiment 2, we will manipulate exposure duration and pre-event instructions to determine if pre-event instructions differentially impact high or low quality eyewitness events. If pre-event instructions impact eyewitness identification accuracy, then the findings of existing studies need to be considered in the context of their pre-event instructions and future work will be needed to determine how instructions interact with existing systems and estimator variables.

scholarly journals Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Elphick ◽  
Richard Philpot ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Avelie Stuart ◽  
Graham Pike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Eyewitness Identification ◽  
Identification Accuracy ◽  
Directed Search ◽  
Filler Task ◽  
Online Study ◽  
Social Media Site ◽  
Police Lineup ◽  
Mock Crime ◽  
Lineup Identification

Eyewitnesses to crimes sometimes search for a culprit on social media before viewing a police lineup, but it is not known whether this affects subsequent lineup identification accuracy. The present online study was conducted to address this. Two hundred and eighty-five participants viewed a mock crime video, and after a 15–20 min delay either (i) viewed a mock social media site including the culprit, (ii) viewed a mock social media site including a lookalike, or (iii) completed a filler task. A week later, participants made an identification from a photo lineup. It was predicted that searching for a culprit on social media containing the lookalike (rather than the culprit) would reduce lineup identification accuracy. There was a significant association between social media exposure and lineup accuracy for the Target Present lineup (30% more of the participants who saw the lookalike on social media failed to positively identify the culprit than participants in the other conditions), but for the Target Absent lineup (which also included the lookalike) there was no significant association with lineup identification accuracy. The results suggest that if an eyewitness sees a lookalike (where they are expecting to see the culprit) when conducting a self-directed search on social media, they are less likely to subsequently identify the culprit in the formal ID procedure.

scholarly journals The influence of similarity-judgement after witness to lineup identification.

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (0) ◽  
pp. 2EV-054-2EV-054
Author(s):  
Akinori Harada ◽  
Naoto Suzuki ◽  
Keita Ochi
Keyword(s):  
Similarity Judgement ◽  
Lineup Identification

Evidence-based policing in Australia: an examination of the appropriateness and transparency of lineup identification and investigative interviewing practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-98
Author(s):  
Hayley J. Cullen ◽  
Lisanne Adam ◽  
Celine van Golde
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Psychological Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Investigative Interviewing ◽  
Best Practice Guidelines ◽  
Police Investigations ◽  
American Psychology ◽  
Lineup Identification ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Evidence Based Policing

Psychological research has been pivotal in influencing the way police forces globally approach and undertake criminal investigations. Increasing psychological research in recent years has led to the development of best-practice guidelines for conducting police investigations, across a number of key areas of criminal investigation. For example, procedures for creating and conducting lineups as recommended by the American Psychology-Law Society, and the UK-developed PEACE model for investigative interviewing, have both been of influence in Australia. However, the extent to which these evidence-based recommendations have been incorporated into policing practice within Australia is unclear. In this article, we conducted an exploratory review of publicly available policing documents within Australian states and territories, to determine the extent to which best practice lineup identification and investigative interviewing procedures have been adopted into police practice. The review revealed that for lineup identification procedures, many of the basic recommendations for conducting lineups were not incorporated into publicly available policing manuals. For investigative interviewing, it appeared on the surface that elements of the PEACE model were implemented within most Australian jurisdictions, albeit this was often not explicitly stated within policing documents. A key issue identified was a lack of (understandable) public transparency of policing procedure, as a number of Australian jurisdictions failed to have publicly available policing manuals or handbooks against which to evaluate their procedures. Therefore, we argue that there is a need for better collaboration between researchers and law enforcement in order to achieve evidence-based, transparent policing within Australia.

scholarly journals Holistic Facial Composite Construction and Subsequent Lineup Identification Accuracy: Comparing Adults and Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh P. Davis ◽  
Sarah Thorniley ◽  
Stuart Gibson ◽  
Chris Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Identification Accuracy ◽  
Composite Construction ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Lineup Identification ◽  
Facial Composite

Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects.

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1280-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Dysart ◽  
R. C. L. Lindsay ◽  
Robin Hammond ◽  
Paul Dupuis
Keyword(s):  
Lineup Identification
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document