scholarly journals Co-Morbid Personality Disorders among Alcohol Dependent Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Om Prakash ◽  
Masroor Jahan ◽  
Amool R. Singh ◽  
Jay Kumar Ranjan
Author(s):  
D.I. Shustov ◽  
A.D. Shustov ◽  
O.D. Tuchina ◽  
T.V. Klimenko ◽  
A.A. Solodov ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1035-1035
Author(s):  
F. Oliva ◽  
R. Picci ◽  
F. Vigna-Taglianti ◽  
F. Mathis ◽  
S. Salmaso ◽  
...  

IntroductionAlcohol abuse and dependence are frequently associated with psychiatric disorders and Personality Disorders, with differences among genders. However, only few studies investigated gender differences in personality disorders among alcoholics.AimsThe aim of our study is to investigate personality disorders in a sample of inpatient alcoholics applying Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory - III, and to describe gender differences in prevalence and comorbidity of personality disorders.MethodsThe study population consist of 206 alcohol dependent patients entering detoxification treatment in a specialized clinic in Italy. At enrollment, patients filled in the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory - III for the assessment of personality disorders and the AUDIT Test for the evaluation of alcohol consumption.ResultsThe sample consisted of 150 men and 56 women. According to Millon assessment, 25% percent of men vs 12% of women had one PDs, 16% vs 23% had two PDs, and 46% vs 48% had more than three PDs. A statistically significant higher proportion of women got high scores on Avoidant (21.4% vs 9.3%, p = 0.020), Self-Defeating (50.0% vs 24.0%, p < 0.001), and Borderline scale (42.9% vs 25.3%, p = 0.015). Associations among PD are sporadic among men whilst are very frequent among women. Depressive, Self-Defeating and Borderline PDs are frequently associated both to other PDs and among each other, suggesting a possible female pattern.ConclusionsBorderline PD is confirmed to be more frequent among alcoholic women than among men. More studies are needed to clarify prevalence and associations of PDs, prognosis, and gender differences in alcoholics patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
U.W. Preuss ◽  
M. Johann ◽  
C. Fehr ◽  
G. Koller ◽  
N. Wodarz ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich W. Preuss ◽  
Gabriele Koller ◽  
Sven Barnow ◽  
Markus Eikmeier ◽  
Michael Soyka

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-6

Abstract Personality disorders are enduring patterns of inner experience and behavior that deviate markedly from those expected by the individual's culture; these inflexible and pervasive patterns reflect issues with cognition, affectivity, interpersonal functioning and impulse control, and lead to clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fourth Edition, defines two specific personality disorders, in addition to an eleventh condition, Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. Cluster A personality disorders include paranoid, schizoid, and schizotypal personalities; of these, Paranoid Personality Disorder probably is most common in the legal arena. Cluster B personality disorders include antisocial, borderline, histrionic, and narcissistic personality. Such people may suffer from frantic efforts to avoid perceived abandonment, patterns of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships, an identity disturbance, and impulsivity. Legal issues that involve individuals with cluster B personality disorders often involve determination of causation of the person's problems, assessment of claims of harassment, and assessment of the person's fitness for employment. Cluster C personality disorders include avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive personality. Two case histories illustrate some of the complexities of assessing impairment in workers with personality disorders, including drug abuse, hospitalizations, and inpatient and outpatient psychotherapy.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Ottosson ◽  
Martin Grann ◽  
Gunnar Kullgren

Summary: Short-term stability or test-retest reliability of self-reported personality traits is likely to be biased if the respondent is affected by a depressive or anxiety state. However, in some studies, DSM-oriented self-reported instruments have proved to be reasonably stable in the short term, regardless of co-occurring depressive or anxiety disorders. In the present study, we examined the short-term test-retest reliability of a new self-report questionnaire for personality disorder diagnosis (DIP-Q) on a clinical sample of 30 individuals, having either a depressive, an anxiety, or no axis-I disorder. Test-retest scorings from subjects with depressive disorders were mostly unstable, with a significant change in fulfilled criteria between entry and retest for three out of ten personality disorders: borderline, avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Scorings from subjects with anxiety disorders were unstable only for cluster C and dependent personality disorder items. In the absence of co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorders, mean dimensional scores of DIP-Q showed no significant differences between entry and retest. Overall, the effect from state on trait scorings was moderate, and it is concluded that test-retest reliability for DIP-Q is acceptable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document