scholarly journals A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Crowns Fabricated by Three All Ceramic CAD-CAM Systems Using Their Respective Scanners - An in vitro study

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-19
Author(s):  
Sabita M. Ram ◽  
Niku Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Laser Scanner ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
Optical Scanner ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Ceramic Crowns ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cam Systems

Abstract Aim To evaluate and compare the marginal fit of crowns fabricated by three All Ceramic CAD-CAM systems using their respective scanners. Objectives 1. To evaluate the marginal fit of All Ceramic crowns fabricated using Contact scanner- Procera system. 2. To evaluate the marginal fit of All Ceramic crowns fabricated using Optical scanner-Lava system. 3. To evaluate the marginal fit of All Ceramic crowns fabricated using Laser scanner-Cercon system. 4. To compare the marginal fit of crowns fabricated by three All Ceramic CAD-CAM systems using their respective scanner-Contact scanner, Optical scanner and Laser scanner. Materials and Methods 5 crowns fabricated with Contact scanner- Procera system (Group I), 5 crowns fabricated with Optical scanner-Lava system (Group II), 5 crowns fabricated with Laser scanner-Cercon system(Group III). The marginal fit would be evaluated at two stages for each group: A- Pre-veneering stage (coping) B-Post-veneering stage (crown). Results The mean value of marginal gap with Group IA was 27.48 +2.63 and IB was 26.13+ 0.85 and that of Group IIA was 23.27 + 0.99 and IIB 19.22 + 0.88. The mean value of marginal gap of Group IIIA was 32.80 + 2.46 and IIIB was 28.77 + 1.94. Conclusion The marginal gap was maximum with Group III and minimum with group II amongst the three used systems. The mean marginal gap values of subgroup B were less than subgroup A.

scholarly journals Evaluation of marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM vs conventional all-ceramic crowns on an implant abutment: An in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
Himanshu Aeran ◽  
Megha Sagar ◽  
Jyotsna Seth
Keyword(s):  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
Group I ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Marginal Discrepancy ◽  
Laboratory Procedures ◽  
Ceramic Crowns ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vertical Gap

The survival of fixed prosthodontic restorations depends on the state of the marginal adaptation. Marginal gaps can create a favourable condition for biofilm deposition, thereby contributing to the development of caries and periodontal disease. The longevity of fixed prosthodontic restorations depends on the condition of the marginal adaptation to the abutment teeth. The presented work aimed to study, evaluate and compare the marginal adaptation of All-Ceramic crowns fabricated using conventional laboratory procedures with those fabricated using the CAD/CAM technology.To compare the marginal fit and adaptation of All- Ceramic crowns obtained by conventional techniques and crowns obtained by CAD/CAM technique. The presented study focused on a total of 20 samples divided into two groups viz. Group I (Conventional) and Group II (CAD/CAM) having 10 sample each. The samples were prepared with the straight abutment having a standardized collar height of 2mm, HIOSSEN that was mounted on acrylic blocks using implant analogue, HIOSSEN. A set of crowns was produced by 5-axis milling lithium disilicate using glass-ceramic blocks with laboratory fabrication methods. Another set of zirconia crowns was produced using CAD/CAM technology. Circumferential marginal gap measurements were taken at 12 measurement locations on the hexagonal die marked equidistant to each other. Both the samples were measured for marginal discrepancy at under the stereomicroscope.The results obtained showed that the mean vertical gap for the group II samples showed the least variation in the marginal discrepancy. Although the mean obtained for both the groups showed that the mean vertical marginal discrepancy was within the clinically acceptable level.It can be concluded that within the limitation of the study the data obtained showed that The Mean vertical gap was the maximum for Group I (Conventional group) i.e. 49.25 µm showing maximum variation in marginal fit. While the CAD/CAM Group had shown least vertical marginal discrepancy which depicts statistically significant better marginal fit than those fabricated using conventional laboratory procedures.

scholarly journals Marginal and Internal Fit of Ceramic Prostheses Fabricated from Different Chairside CAD/CAM Systems: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 857
Author(s):  
Keunbada Son ◽  
Kyu-Bok Lee
Keyword(s):  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Internal Fit ◽  
Cam Systems

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal and internal fits of ceramic crowns fabricated with chairside computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems. An experimental model based on ISO 12836:2015 was digitally scanned with different intraoral scanners (Omnicam (CEREC), EZIS PO (DDS), and CS3500 (Carestream)). Ceramic crowns were fabricated using the CAD/CAM process recommended by each system (CEREC, EZIS, and Carestream systems; N = 15). The 3-dimensional (3D) marginal and internal fit of each ceramic crown was measured using a 3D inspection software (Geomagic control X). Differences among the systems and various measurements were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistically significant differences were validated using pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05). Occlusal gaps in the CEREC, EZIS, and Carestream groups were 113.0, 161.3, and 438.2 µm, respectively (p < 0.001). The axial gaps were 83.4, 78.0, and 107.9 µm, respectively. The marginal gaps were 77.8, 99.3, and 60.6 µm, respectively, and the whole gaps were 85.9, 107.3, and 214.0 µm, respectively. Significant differences were observed with the EZIS system compared with the other two systems in terms of the marginal gap sizes. The CEREC system showed no significant differences among the four measured regions. However, the EZIS and Carestream systems did show a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). All three systems were judged to be capable of fabricating clinically acceptable prostheses, because the marginal gap, which is the most important factor in the marginal fit of prostheses, was recorded to be below 100 µm in all three systems.

Marginal Fit of Heat-pressed vs CAD/CAM Processed All-ceramic Onlays Using a Milling Unit Prototype

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Reich ◽  
S. Gozdowski ◽  
L. Trentzsch ◽  
R. Frankenberger ◽  
U. Lohbauer
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Important Influence ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

Clinical Relevance The marginal fit of all-ceramic restorations has an important influence on the clinical performance and lifetime of adhesively luted restorations. In proximal boxes, an average marginal gap of less than 100 μm is claimed. These clinical requirements are fulfilled by both processing procedures.

The Marginal Fit of CAD-CAM Zirconia Cores with Different Proximal Margin Configurations

2007 ◽  
Vol 330-332 ◽  
pp. 1409-1412
Author(s):  
O.E. Puntsag ◽  
E.K. Bae ◽  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
Keun Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Proximal Margin ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
Group I ◽  
Metal Ceramic ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tooth Axis

This study evaluated the marginal fit of CAD-CAM Zirconia cores with different proximal height. Thirty Zirconia cores and ten metal ceramics crowns were used to evaluate the marginal gap. The marginal fit was determined to be perpendicular to the tooth axis between the most apical point on the coping margin (core) and the reference marks on the mesial, distal, labial, and palatal surfaces of the die at several key stages of crown fabrication; before porcelain built-up, after body porcelain built-up, and after glazing. Additionally, an opaque stage for the metal ceramic copings was compared as well. Each measurement was carried out with a microscope. The means of gaps among the groups were 58±27 -m, 69±23 -m, 89±29 -m and 80±28 -m, groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. In relation to the proximal and labiopalatal surfaces there were no statistical difference among the groups, except group I. No significant differences were observed in firing stages of all groups. The findings of this study showed that the mean marginal gap of Zirconia cores with different proximal heights fell well within the acceptable clinical ranges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document