Dystocia and Cephalopelvic Disproportion

Author(s):  
Sadhana Gupta
2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
MS Lenhard ◽  
T Johnson ◽  
S Weckbach ◽  
K Nikolaou ◽  
K Friese ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jha

Background: The main aim of this study is to determine the maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy among women with one previous caesarean section at term in relation to vaginal delivery, post partum complication, neonatal complication like low Apgar score, fetal weight and admission in special baby unit. Methods: This is a prospective and descriptive study done in a sample size of 100. Inclusion criteria were term pregnancy, single live fetus with cephalic presentation with one previous caesarean section. During study period total number of obstetric admissions was 3546 and 115 cases were admitted with previous one caesarean section. Result: Out of 100 cases, 31 cases had vaginal delivery and 69 cases had caesarean section. Among 31 vaginal deliveries, 24 cases had spontaneous vaginal delivery and 7 had assisted delivery with vacuum, main indication of vacuum delivery was to cut short the second stage of labor that was in 5(71.43%) cases. Among 69 caesarean section cases, 51 had emergency caesarean section and 18 had elective caesarean section and cephalopelvic disproportion was the main indication in both the groups. Most common complication was scar dehiscence and postpartum hemorrhage. There were two still births in each group and one minute APGAR score was slightly better in caesarean section. Conclusions: Patients with previous caesarean section are at high risk of repeat emergency or elective caesarean section. About one in three patients with previous caesarean section delivered vaginally. In the present study postpartum hemorrhage was the commonest complication, which was found in caesarean section, and only  one puerperal pyrexia was seen in case of vaginal delivery. Key words: Cephalopelvic disproportion, Premature rupture of membrane, Septicemia, Vacuum delivery   DOI: 10.3126/jnhrc.v7i1.2275 Journal of Nepal Health Research Council Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009 April 25-28


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Nieves L. González González ◽  
Enrique González Dávila ◽  
Agustina González Martín ◽  
Erika Padrón ◽  
José Ángel García Hernández

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to determine if customized fetal growth charts developed excluding obese and underweight mothers (CC<sub>(18.5–25)</sub>) are better than customized curves (CC) at identifying pregnancies at risk of perinatal morbidity. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> Data from 20,331 infants were used to construct CC and from 11,604 for CC<sub>(18.5–25)</sub>, after excluding the cases with abnormal maternal BMI. The 2 models were applied to 27,507 newborns and the perinatal outcomes were compared between large for gestational age (LGA) or small for gestational age (SGA) according to each model. Logistic regression was used to calculate the OR of outcomes by the group, with gestational age (GA) as covariable. The confidence intervals of pH were calculated by analysis of covariance. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The rate of cesarean and cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) were higher in LGA<sub>only by CC</sub><sub><sub>(18.5−25)</sub></sub> than in LGA<sub>only by CC</sub>. In SGA<sub>only by CC</sub><sub><sub>(18.5−25)</sub></sub>, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and perinatal mortality rates were higher than in SGA<sub>only by CC</sub>. Adverse outcomes rate was higher in LGA<sub>only by CC</sub><sub><sub>(18.5−25)</sub></sub> than in LGA<sub>only by CC</sub> (21.6%; OR = 1.61, [1.34–193]) vs. (13.5%; OR = 0.84, [0.66–1.07]), and in SGA <sub>only by CC</sub><sub><sub>(18.5−25)</sub></sub> than in SGA<sub>only by CC</sub> (9.6%; OR = 1.62, [1.25–2.10] vs. 6.3%; OR = 1.18, [0.85–1.66]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The use of CC<sub>(18.5–25)</sub> allows a more accurate identification of LGA and SGA infants at risk of perinatal morbidity than conventional CC. This benefit increase and decrease, respectively, with GA.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-524
Author(s):  
James F. Jones ◽  
John B. Woodall ◽  
Phyllis R. Selter ◽  
Gary L. Neal ◽  
Samuel C. Carter

In the March 1974 issue of Pediatrics, Drs. Cook et al. describe an infant with a pneumothorax secondary to a diagnostic amniocentesis.1 We have recently treated a similar case, but with an additional, unusual finding. A 25-year-old black woman (gravida 4, para 2, abortus 1) with sickle cell trait, previous cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion, left renal calculi, and recurrent urinary tract infection, was admitted December 24, 1973 with pyelonephritis and intrauterine pregnancy. She was treated with gentamycin and progressed satisfactorily.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlora Ademi Ibishi ◽  
Rozalinda Dusan Isjanovska

BACKGROUND: Pre-labour Rupture of Membranes (PROM) is an important cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and increased rate of cesarean section delivery. AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics, PROM-delivery interval, mode of delivery, and early maternal neonatal outcome among pregnant patients presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes.MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective case control study is implemented at the Obstetric and Gynecology Clinic of the University Clinical Center of Kosovo. The study included 100 pregnant patients presenting with prelabour rupture of membranes of which 63 were primigravida and 37 patients were multigravida.RESULTS: The incidence of cesarean section in this study is 28 % and the most common indications for cesarean delivery were fetal distress, malpresentation, cephalopelvic disproportion, and failed induction. The most common maternal complications in this study are chorioamnionitis, retained placenta and postpartum hemorrhage. Neonatal infectious morbidity was present in 16 % of cases.CONCLUSION: PROM is a significant issue for obstetricians and an important cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and increased rate of cesarean section delivery.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e019120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Wehberg ◽  
Rikke Guldberg ◽  
Kim Oren Gradel ◽  
Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel ◽  
Lis Munk ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to estimate the effects of risk factors on elective and emergency caesarean section (CS) and to estimate the between-hospital variation of risk-adjusted CS proportions.DesignHistorical registry-based cohort study.Settings and participantsThe study was based on all singleton deliveries in hospital units in Denmark from January 2009 to December 2012. A total of 226 612 births by 198 590 mothers in 29 maternity units were included.Primary and secondary outcome measuresWe estimated (1) OR of elective and emergency CS adjusted for several risk factors, for example, body mass index, parity, age and size of maternity unit and (2) risk-adjusted proportions of elective and emergency CS to evaluate between-hospital variation.ResultsThe CS proportion was stable at 20%–21%, but showed wide variation between units, even in adjusted models. Large units performed significantly more elective CSs than smaller units, and the risk of emergency CS was significantly reduced compared with smaller units. Many of the included risk factors were found to influence the risk of CS. The most important risk factors were breech presentation and previous CS. Four units performed more CSs and one unit fewer CSs than expected.ConclusionThe main risk factors for elective CS were breech presentation and previous CS; for emergency CS they were breech presentation and cephalopelvic disproportion. The proportions of CS were stable during the study period. We found variation in risk-adjusted CS between hospitals in Denmark. Although exhaustive models were applied, the results indicated the presence of systematic variation between hospital units, which was unexpected in a small, well-regulated country such as Denmark.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document