Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Test

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Luiza Teixeira ◽  
Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira ◽  
Nathália Alves Rodrigues ◽  
Guilherme Augusto Santos Bueno ◽  
Maria Eduarda Oliveira Novais ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Ethan S. Welch ◽  
Matthew D. Watson ◽  
George J. Davies ◽  
Bryan L. Riemann

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 120-125
Author(s):  
Ethan S. Welch ◽  
Matthew D. Watson ◽  
George J. Davies ◽  
Bryan L. Riemann

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Ubinger ◽  
William E. Prentice ◽  
Kevin M. Guskiewicz

When the upper extremity is injured, open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises are primarily used to increase strength and restore functional ability—the goals of rehabilitation. It is also imperative, however, that the receptors responsible for static and dynamic stabilization of the joint be trained. This can be done with closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises. The purposes of this study were to investigate the effect of a 4-week CKC training program on the neuromuscular control of the upper extremity and to determine whether there was a significant difference between skill-dominant limb and nondominant limb stability indices. Thirty-two physically active participants (14 men, 18 women) were tested on the FASTEX 4 weeks apart. The training group's scores significantly improved, whereas the control group's scores remained the same. It was concluded that the CKC training significantly improved the training group's ability to remain stable. The results suggest that CKC training can increase the accuracy of joint position sense because of increased stimulation of the mechanoreceptors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helga Tatiana Tucci ◽  
Jaqueline Martins ◽  
Guilherme de Carvalho Sposito ◽  
Paula Maria Ferreira Camarini ◽  
Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Michele Forgiarini Saccol ◽  
Gisele Garcia Zanca ◽  
Rafaela Oliveira Machado ◽  
Lilian Pinto Teixeira ◽  
Rose Löbell ◽  
...  

Context: Volleyball and handball players have usually been studied collectively as “overhead athletes,” since throwing present similarities in the proximal to distal movement sequencing and upper limb joints ranges of motion. However, each sport presents specificities in the objectives when accelerating the ball and a variety of possible throwing techniques. Therefore, it is expected there may be differences in the shoulder and upper body physical performance between sports. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if there are differences in shoulder muscle strength and upper body field performance tests between volleyball and handball athletes. Design: Cross-sectional. Methods: Ninety-nine volleyball and handball female athletes aged between 13 and 20 years were evaluated for isometric shoulder abductor and rotator strength (handheld dynamometer) and upper body field performance tests: Y Balance Test—Upper Quarter, modified Closed Kinetic Chain Upper-Extremity Stability Test, and unilateral and bilateral Seated Medicine Ball Throw. Results: Handball athletes presented greater shoulder internal rotation strength (between-group difference: 2.84; effect size 0.70), higher medial (between-group difference: 9.54; effect size 0.90), superolateral (between-group differences: 8.9; effect size 0.68), and composite scores (between-group difference 5.7; effect size 0.75) of the Y Balance Test—Upper Quarter and higher unilateral (between-group difference: 41.92; effect size 0.91) and bilateral (between-group difference: 46.11; effect size 0.83) Seated Medicine Ball Throw performance. Groups were not different for Closed Kinetic Chain Upper-Extremity Stability Test, external rotation, and abduction isometric strength. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that young female handball athletes present greater internal rotator strength and better performance in Y Balance Test—Upper Quarter and Seated Medicine Ball Throw compared to volleyball players. These differences may be related to the different demands required in the throwing movements performed in each sport and should be considered when assessing these populations.


1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin E. Wilk ◽  
Christopher A. Arrigo ◽  
James R. Andrews

The use of closed kinetic chain exercise has grown in the past several years. Closed kinetic chain exercises for the lower extremity have been firmly established in the literature and have been strongly recommended as an integral part of rehabilitation of the patient with anterior cruciate ligament injury. While the scientific and clinical rationale for using closed kinetic chain exercise for the lower extremity appears obvious, the scientific rationale for using closed kinetic chain exercise for the upper extremity is less clear. The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the scientific rationale for closed kinetic chain for the upper extremity patient. In addition, exercise drills to enhance dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint are discussed, and a rationale for using these exercises for specific glenohumeral joint pathologies is provided. The concepts of closed and open kinetic chain as applied to the lower extremity may not apply to the upper extremity due to the unique anatomical and biomechanical features as well as the function of the shoulder. It is recommended that clinicians use both closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises when treating the shoulder patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document