The first question to be answered, in seeking coordinate systems for geodynamics, is: what is geodynamics? The answer is, of course, that geodynamics is that part of geophysics which is concerned with movements of the Earth, as opposed to geostatics which is the physics of the stationary Earth. But as far as we know, there is no stationary Earth – epur sic monere. So geodynamics is actually coextensive with geophysics, and coordinate systems suitable for the one should be suitable for the other. At the present time, there are not many coordinate systems, if any, that can be identified with a static Earth. Certainly the only coordinate of aeronomic (atmospheric) interest is the height, and this is usually either as geodynamic height or as pressure. In oceanology, the most important coordinate is depth, and this, like heights in the atmosphere, is expressed as metric depth from mean sea level, as geodynamic depth, or as pressure. Only for the earth do we find “static” systems in use, ana even here there is real question as to whether the systems are dynamic or static. So it would seem that our answer to the question, of what kind, of coordinate systems are we seeking, must be that we are looking for the same systems as are used in geophysics, and these systems are dynamic in nature already – that is, their definition involvestime.
Competencia judicial internacional en acciones de consumidores contra compañías aéreas. Comentario a los autos del Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Madrid de 25/9/2018, 4/10/2018, 9/10/2018, 18/10/2018 y a la sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Girona de 27/9/2018 = International judicial competence in consumer actions against air companies. Commentary to the authors of the Court of Commercial of Madrid of 25/9/2018, 4/10/2018, 9/10/2018, 18/10/2018 and the judgment of the Provincial Hearing of Girona on 27/9/2018