scholarly journals En-bloc Resection of the Anterior Skull Base for Advanced Cancer of the Frontal Sinus

1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
Shin-etsu Kamata
1995 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. P168-P168
Author(s):  
Joram Raveh

Educational objectives: To acquaint participants with the anatomic relations in this area and the application of these methods to the anterior skull base and to explain the en bloc resection of the tumor optic nerve decompression and the functional and aesthetic reconstruction of the skull base and frontonasoethmoidal area.


2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
James T. Kryzanski ◽  
Donald J. Annino ◽  
Carl B. Heilman

The treatment of malignant skull base tumors has improved with the development of skull base surgical approaches that allow en bloc resection of a lesion and increase the efficacy of adjuvant therapies. The anatomical complexity of these lesions and their surroundings has led to a relatively high complication rate. Infection and cerebrospinal fluid fistulas are the most common serious procedure-related complications. They result from the frequent necessity of working in a contaminated space such as the paranasal sinuses as well as from the creation of large dural and skull base defects. The authors have reviewed the literature regarding complications of surgery for malignant skull base lesions and present several techniques and strategies for minimizing their incidence by performing the craniofacial approach to anterior skull base lesions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (37) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Vrinceanu ◽  
Bogdan Banica ◽  
Mihai Dumitru ◽  
Gabriela Musat

AbstractBACKGROUND. In case of rhinosinusal malignant tumors, it is important to have a unified and simple terminology. The suprastructure refers to the ethmoid sinus, the sphenoid sinus, the frontal sinus and the olfactory area of the nose. The mesostructure includes the maxillary sinus, excepting the orbital wall, and the respiratory part of the nose.MATERIAL AND METHODS. We will present two clinical cases admitted and surgically treated in our department. The first one is a left-side suprastructure mass in a 39-year-old male patient, with a particular evolution. The second one is a left-side midfacial and suprastructure tumor with 3 prior negative biopsies in a 57-year-old patient. In both cases, we performed an external surgical approach.DISCUSSIONS. For an external approach in mesostructure malignant tumors, we propose a combined approach using lateral nasal rhinotomies, sub-labial rhinotomies and midfacial degloving. The external approach in malignant tumors of the supra-structure is centred on a classical incision for the frontal sinus or a hemicoronal or coronal approach. There are some clear advantages of the open approach to be considered.CONCLUSION. The advantages of the external approach are represented by a direct visualization and control of the tumor during the ablative time; a better control for negative margins; a better control of haemostasis; a better chance for en-bloc resection versus piece-meal resection.


2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobutaka Kawahara ◽  
Tomio Sasaki ◽  
Takahiro Asakage ◽  
Kazunari Nakao ◽  
Masashi Sugasawa ◽  
...  

Object Primary temporal bone malignancy is a rare form of tumor for which the therapeutic strategy remains controversial. In this study, the authors reviewed their experience with radical temporal bone resection (TBR) of such lesions and analyzed the long-term results to provide treatment recommendations. Methods Between 1994 and 2006, 17 patients (10 men and 7 women) underwent total or subtotal TBR for primary temporal bone malignancies. Tumors were graded according to the University of Pittsburgh system. The effects of surgical margins and tumor extensions on patient survival were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results All tumors, except 1, were graded T4 (most advanced). Subtotal TBR was performed in 14 patients, and total TBR was performed in 3. The surgical margin was tumor negative in 10 patients and tumor positive in 7. For large tumors extending into the infratemporal fossa or encroaching on the jugular foramen, orbitozygomatic (3 patients) and posterior transjugular (4 patients) approaches were combined with the standard approach, and en bloc resection with a negative margin was achieved in all cases but 1. The follow-up time ranged from 0.3–11.6 years (mean 3.3 years). The 5-year recurrence-free and disease-specific survival rates were 67.5 and 60.1%, respectively. When a negative surgical margin was achieved, the survival rates improved to 100 and 89%, respectively. Conclusions The neurosurgical skull base technique could improve the probability of en bloc resection with a tumor-free margin for extensive temporal bone malignancies, which would cure a subset of patients. The active participation of neurosurgeons would improve patient care in this field.


1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-319
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi SAITO ◽  
Jun YOSHIDA ◽  
Masakatsu TAKAHASHI ◽  
Takashi HASEGAWA ◽  
Keizo FUKUTA

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 1658-1667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Iwami ◽  
Masazumi Fujii ◽  
Yugo Kishida ◽  
Shinya Jinguji ◽  
Masayuki Yamada ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEAlthough sphenoidotomy is more commonly performed via the transnasal approach than via the transcranial approach, transcranial sphenoidotomy (TCS) remains indispensable for en bloc resection of locally advanced sinonasal malignant tumors (SNMTs) extending to the skull base. TCS also enables transsphenoidal transposition of the temporoparietal galeal flap (TPGF) to compensate for the lack of vascularized reconstructive tissue after endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery. The objective of this study was to review the authors’ surgical experience using TCS with an emphasis on the surgical anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and on the purpose of TCS. Relevant anatomy is further illustrated through cadaveric dissection and photo documentation.METHODSThe authors reviewed the records of 50 patients who underwent TCS at the Nagoya University Hospital, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, or Aichi Medical University Hospital over the course of 7 years (between January 2011 and November 2017). The authors also performed cadaveric dissection in 2 adult cadaveric skull base specimens.RESULTSOf the 50 patients included in this study, 44 underwent craniofacial resection (CFR) for en bloc resection of SNMTs involving the anterior and/or lateral skull base, and 6 underwent transsphenoidal transposition of the TPGF flap. The authors categorized the TCS procedures according to the portion of the sphenoid sinus wall involved (i.e., superior, lateral, and superolateral). Superior sphenoidotomy was used in patients requiring anterior CFR. Lateral sphenoidotomy was further divided into 2 subtypes, with type 1 procedures performed for the transsphenoidal transpositioning of the TPGF, and type 2 procedures used in patients requiring lateral CFR. Superolateral sphenoidotomy was used in anterolateral CFR.CONCLUSIONSTCS still represents a useful tool in the armamentarium of neurosurgeons treating central skull base lesions. The newly proposed surgical classification facilitates a profound understanding of TCS and how to incorporate this technique into clinical practice.


2003 ◽  
Vol 388 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Katoh ◽  
Satoshi Hirano ◽  
Yoshiyasu Ambo ◽  
Eiichi Tanaka ◽  
Shunichi Okushiba ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document