Long-term outcome following radical temporal bone resection for lateral skull base malignancies: a neurosurgical perspective

2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobutaka Kawahara ◽  
Tomio Sasaki ◽  
Takahiro Asakage ◽  
Kazunari Nakao ◽  
Masashi Sugasawa ◽  
...  

Object Primary temporal bone malignancy is a rare form of tumor for which the therapeutic strategy remains controversial. In this study, the authors reviewed their experience with radical temporal bone resection (TBR) of such lesions and analyzed the long-term results to provide treatment recommendations. Methods Between 1994 and 2006, 17 patients (10 men and 7 women) underwent total or subtotal TBR for primary temporal bone malignancies. Tumors were graded according to the University of Pittsburgh system. The effects of surgical margins and tumor extensions on patient survival were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results All tumors, except 1, were graded T4 (most advanced). Subtotal TBR was performed in 14 patients, and total TBR was performed in 3. The surgical margin was tumor negative in 10 patients and tumor positive in 7. For large tumors extending into the infratemporal fossa or encroaching on the jugular foramen, orbitozygomatic (3 patients) and posterior transjugular (4 patients) approaches were combined with the standard approach, and en bloc resection with a negative margin was achieved in all cases but 1. The follow-up time ranged from 0.3–11.6 years (mean 3.3 years). The 5-year recurrence-free and disease-specific survival rates were 67.5 and 60.1%, respectively. When a negative surgical margin was achieved, the survival rates improved to 100 and 89%, respectively. Conclusions The neurosurgical skull base technique could improve the probability of en bloc resection with a tumor-free margin for extensive temporal bone malignancies, which would cure a subset of patients. The active participation of neurosurgeons would improve patient care in this field.

1982 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 641-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gail Neely ◽  
Michael Forrester

Eighteen temporal bones, 20 sets of polytomograms, and two sets of histologically sectioned temporal bones were studied and the literature was reviewed in order to describe the evolution and anatomic detail of the medial limits of the subtotal temporal bone resection used when malignant neoplasia has invaded the middle ear. An en bloc resection requires incisions medial to the pneumatized spaces involved. The anatomy of the lines of resection through the glenoid fossa, medial to the lateral wall of the carotid canal, through the cochlea, internal auditory canal, and jugular bulb, and just lateral to cranial nerves IX, X, and XI was described in detail. Regardless of the techniques employed, or the feasibility of the task, the concept of en bloc resection must conform to the anatomy of the region.


Author(s):  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Daisuke Kuga ◽  
Satoshi Matsuo ◽  
Masaru Miyazaki ◽  
Teppei Noda ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective En bloc and margin-negative surgical resection seems to offer the best prognosis for patients with temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TB-SCC). In this study, we summarize the outcomes of surgical cases of advanced TB-SCC (T3–T4) that were managed in two institutions, with an accompanying description of the surgical procedure that was utilized: modified subtotal temporal bone resection (STBR), which involves the en bloc removal of the temporal bone including or transecting the otic capsule. Design This is a case series study with chart review. Setting The study was conducted at two academic tertiary care medical centers. Participants Chart information was collected for all patients who underwent surgical resection of advanced TB-SCC between July 1998 and February 2019. The resulting dataset contained 43 patients with advanced TB-SCC who underwent en bloc resection during the review period. Tumor staging followed the modified Pittsburgh classification. Disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method. Main Outcome Measure This study shows disease-specific 5-year DSS rate. Results The 5-year DSS rate of the cases who underwent en bloc resection was 79.7%. En bloc lateral temporal bone resection was employed in a total of 25 cases (DSS: 79.0%). En bloc modified STBR was utilized in 18 cases (DSS: 81.7%). Conclusion En bloc margin-negative resection is a reliable treatment strategy for advanced TB-SCC. Modified STBR can be a treatment option for TB-SCC without marked posterior extension.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4556
Author(s):  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Daisuke Kuga ◽  
Koichi Miki ◽  
Takashi Nakagawa

Currently, only lateral temporal bone resection (LTBR) and subtotal temporal bone resection (STBR) are widely utilized for the surgical treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal (EAC-SCC). However, there are few descriptions of variations on these surgical approaches. This study aimed to elucidate the variations of en bloc resection for advanced EAC-SCC. We dissected the four sides of cadaveric heads to reveal the anatomical structures related to temporal bone resection. From the viewpoint of surgical anatomy, surgical patterns of temporal bone cutting can be divided into four categories: conventional LTBR, extended LTBR, conventional STBR, and modified STBR. Extended LTBR is divided into four types: superior, inferior, anterior, and posterior extensions. Several extension procedures can be combined based on the extension of the tumor. Furthermore, en bloc resection with the temporomandibular joint or glenoid fossa increases the technical difficulty of a surgical procedure because the exposure and manipulation of the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery are limited from the middle cranial fossa. Surgical approaches for advanced SCC of the temporal bone are diverse. They require accurate preoperative evaluation of the tumor extension and preoperative consideration of the exact line of resection to achieve marginal negative resection.


1984 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam E. Kinney ◽  
Benjamin G. Wood

Improved radiographic diagnosis and new surgical approaches make it possible to consider surgical treatment of skull-base malignancies. For many years treatment of external auditory canal and middle ear malignancies has involved subtotal or radical temporal bone surgery; these approaches and techniques will be discussed in detail, in our experience the need for radical temporal bone resection has changed considerably. Total tumor removal followed by radiation therapy seems to yield survival rates and relief of pain equal to formal temporal bone resection with the attendant complications. The new radio-diagnostic techniques, including high-resolution computerized tomographic scans and digital subtraction angiography, allow better assessment of skull-base lesions. If we can determine by computerized tomography that a skull-base malignancy is well defined and not extending into different areas, en bloc surgical resection might be indicated. Details of this radiologic evaluation will be presented along with some surgical approaches to lesions possibly amenable to surgical resection.


1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Thayer Sataloff ◽  
Donald L. Myers ◽  
Louis Dale Lowry ◽  
Joseph R. Spiegel

Because of unsatisfactory results in treatment of malignant conditions of the temporal bone, a technique for total en bloc resection of the temporal bone and carotid artery was reported by Graham et al. in 1984. The procedure involves resection of the internal carotid artery, cranial nerves VI through XII, and structures adjacent to the temporal bone. Experience with two additional cases led to numerous modifications in the recommended procedure, as reported by Sataloff and Myers. Additional clinical experience with this technique and its complications has resulted in further modification. Additional pitfalls and specific changes in technique from previous reports are discussed in detail, including a new procedure to assure the adequacy of contralateral venous outflow.


Skull Base ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoukaa Sargi ◽  
Robert Gerring ◽  
Adrien Eshraghi ◽  
David Arnold ◽  
Francisco Civantos ◽  
...  

Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neila L. Kline ◽  
Kavita Bhatnagar ◽  
David J. Eisenman ◽  
Rodney J. Taylor

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. E258-E262
Author(s):  
Christian Suchy ◽  
Moritz Berger ◽  
Ingo Steinbrück ◽  
Tsuneo Oyama ◽  
Naohisa Yahagi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims We previously reported a case series of our first 182 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESDs). In the initial series, 155 ESDs had been technically feasible, with 137 en bloc resections and 97 en bloc resections with free margins (R0). Here, we present long-term follow-up data, with particular emphasis on cases where either en bloc resection was not achieved or en bloc resection resulted in positive margins (R1). Patients and methods Between September 2012 and October 2015, we performed 182 consecutive ESD procedures in 178 patients (median size 41.0 ± 17.4 mm; localization rectum vs. proximal rectum 63 vs. 119). Data on follow-up were obtained from our endoscopy database and from referring physicians. Results Of the initial cohort, 11 patients underwent surgery; follow-up data were available for 141 of the remaining 171 cases (82,5 %) with a median follow-up of 2.43 years (range 0.15–6.53). Recurrent adenoma was observed in 8 patients (n = 2 after margin positive en bloc ESD; n = 6 after fragmented resection). Recurrence rates were lower after en bloc resection, irrespective of involved margins (1.8 vs. 18,2 %; P < 0.01). All recurrences were low-grade adenomas and could be managed endoscopically. Conclusions The rate of recurrence is low after en bloc ESD, in particular if a one-piece resection can be achieved. Recurrence after fragmented resection is comparable to published data on piecemeal mucosal resection.


2011 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 1024-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elie Fadel ◽  
Gilles Missenard ◽  
Charles Court ◽  
Olaf Mercier ◽  
Sacha Mussot ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document