scholarly journals The diagnosis of healthcare policy problems in Korea

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Cheol Park ◽  
Sung-In Jang
2012 ◽  
pp. 80-97
Author(s):  
B. Kheifets

The paper discusses the debt component of the current global crisis, which becomes stronger in 2011—2012. The Russian economy is analyzed in terms of its debt stability: a thorough analysis shows that it is not quite adequate. This paper presents the main problems that could be exacerbated by the global debt crisis (strong dependence of the budget on the volatility of oil prices, deterioration of conditions for external borrowing and overheat of the domestic debt market, too high public pension liabilities, substantial corporate debt and high level of state paternalism in regard to big business). Some measures to address Russian debt policy problems are proposed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nagwa Nashat ◽  
Redouane Hadjij ◽  
Abdul Munem Al Dabbagh ◽  
Mohammed Rasoul Tarawneh ◽  
Huda Alduwaisan ◽  
...  

HEC Forum ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita J. Tarzian ◽  
Diane E. Hoffmann ◽  
Rose Mary Volbrecht ◽  
Judy L. Meyers

2021 ◽  
pp. 002085232199755
Author(s):  
M. Jae Moon ◽  
Kohei Suzuki ◽  
Tae In Park ◽  
Kentaro Sakuwa

Korea and Japan, neighboring democratic countries in Northeast Asia, announced their first COVID-19 cases in January 2020 and witnessed similar patterns of disease spread but adopted different policy approaches to address the pandemic (agile and proactive approach versus cautious and restraint-based approach). Applying the political nexus triad model, this study analyzes and compares institutional contexts and governance structures of Korea and Japan, then examines the differences in policy responses of the two Asian countries. This study first reviews the state of COVID-19 and examines changes in the conventional president-led political nexus triad in Korea and the bureaucracy-led political nexus triad in Japan. Then, this study examines how the differences in institutional contexts and governance structures shaped policy responses and policy outcomes of the two countries in managing the COVID-19 crisis. Points for practitioners •  Institutional and governance structure in a society are likely to affect policymaking processes as well as selection of policies among various policy alternatives. •  Government officials often need to refer to government capacity as well as citizens’ voluntary participation in resolving wicked policy problems like COVID-19. •  Policy decisions made by government officials affect policy outcomes while political environment and political leadership are equally important to policy effectiveness.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary S. Koithan ◽  
Mary Jo Kreitzer ◽  
Jean Watson

The principles of integrative nursing and caring science align with the unitary paradigm in a way that can inform and shape nursing knowledge, patient care delivery across populations and settings, and new healthcare policy. The proposed policies may transform the healthcare system in a way that supports nursing praxis and honors the discipline’s unitary paradigm. This call to action provides a distinct and hopeful vision of a healthcare system that is accessible, equitable, safe, patient-centered, and affordable. In these challenging times, it is the unitary paradigm and nursing wisdom that offer a clear path forward.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document