scholarly journals Comparing SSI In Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Sabih Nofal ◽  
Anum Arif ◽  
Ahsan Khan ◽  
Sundus Saif ◽  
Abdul Waheed Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Purse String ◽  
Stoma Reversal ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the frequency of Surgical Site Infection ( SSI ) and mean length of hospital stay between the Purse-string closure and conventional primary closure techniques for stoma reversal. Methods: The study was carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital Lahore from January 5, 2018 to July 5, 2018. The study designed as a Observational Study. Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy were randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients were called for follow up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups were checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay. The data was statistically analyzed by using SPSS v23.0.t test (independent sample) used for the comparison of hospital stay mean. Chi-square was also used for the comparison of the frequencies of SSI. Data were stratified for gender and age. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered as significant. Results: A total of 140 patients were enrolled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups i.e. Group- A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). In group-A, mean duration of hospital stay was 5.7±1.0 days, while 7.3±1.1 days in group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.000. In group-A, surgical site infection was in 4(5.7%) patients, while 11(15.7%) patients of group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.046. Conclusion: The frequency of surgical site infection and mean length of hospital stay after stoma reversal, purse-string suturing technique is significantly less than conventional primary closure technique. Key Words: Surgical stoma; Ileostomy; Closure; Infection. How to cite: Nofal S., Arif A., Khan A., Saif. S., Khan W.A., Arif A. Comparing SSI in Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal. Esculapio 2021; 17(01): 15-19

scholarly journals Comparative study of linear closure technique versur purse string closure technique of skin closure in stoma reversal.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (05) ◽  
pp. 1038-1042
Author(s):  
M. Rehman Gulzar ◽  
Faiqa Aslam ◽  
Muhammad Umar Farooq ◽  
Shahbaz Ahmad ◽  
Sabeen Adil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Purse String ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Wound Length

Objectives: To compare the results of linear closure technique with purse string closure technique in terms of surgical site infection, wound healing (scar cosmesis) and wound length. Study Design: Comparative Study. Setting: Surgical Unit V, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad. Period: January 2016 to January 2019. Material & Methods: A total of 100 patients were operated in our unit during the study period & were allocated into two groups randomly: Group A (Linear closure) Group B (Purse string closure) included 50 patients in each group. The primary outcome measures were, surgical site infection, wound healing (scar cosmesis) and wound length. Results: During follow up period Surgical site infection was noted in 17 patients out of 100 with 14 patients in Group A and 03 Patients in Group B (p value 0.002). Regarding wound healing 60% patients were having good scar and 20% patients were having satisfactory and 20% having poor scar in Group A. while in Group B 82% patients were having good scar and 18% patients were having satisfactory scar (p value 0.00). Mean wound length in Group A was 5.14 with SD 1.2978 while in Group B mean length was 3.8 with SD 1.3095. Conclusion: Our study concludes that purse string closure is superior to linear closure technique in terms of surgical site infection, wound healing (scar cosmesis) and wound length.

scholarly journals A comparative study of open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Singh ◽  
Sumit Kumar Gupta ◽  
Mukesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Cholelithiasis is a major cause of morbidity among Indians with a female preponderance. Most of the cases of gallstones are asymptomatic. For a long time, open cholecystectomy (OC) used to be the surgical treatment for cholelithiasis. But with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been a gradual shift in the treatment with most surgeons preferring LC over OC. Apart from the benefits of decreased hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain and earlier return to normal activity LC are also cosmetically better as compared to OC. Longer operative time and increased incidence of biliary leakage are some pitfalls of LC in initial phase of surgical practice.Methods: A prospective study of 100 patients was carried out in the department of surgery in IQ city medical college and Durgapur city hospital, Durgapur between January 2017 and August 2017 with the aim of comparing open cholecystectomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery while Group B patients underwent open surgery for cholelithiasis.Results: Duration of surgery was longer in OC than LC (72.4min versus 44.7min.). Mean duration of post-operative pain was 18.3hrs in group A as compared to mean duration of 30.7hrs in group B patients. The mean period of post-operative hospital stay was 1.8 days in group A and 4.8 days in group B. Post-operative resumption of normal diet was possible in 2.1 days in OC while it took lesser time (1.2 days) in LC. The rate of surgical site infection was higher in OC as compared to LC.Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended as first choice operative treatment for patients with cholelithiasis as it provides better cosmetic results, lesser pain, lesser post-operative hospital stay and fewer incidence of surgical site infection.

scholarly journals SURGICAL SITE INFECTION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1770-1774
Author(s):  
Syed Muhammad Asar Hussain ◽  
Saadat Ali Janjua ◽  
Amna Fareed ◽  
Asrar Ahmad ◽  
Irum Saleem
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Trial Duration ◽  
Primary Wound Closure ◽  
Delayed Primary Closure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare the frequency of surgical site infection after primaryand delayed primary wound closure in dirty abdominal wounds. Study Design: Randomizedcontrolled trial. Duration and Setting: This study was carried out over a period of six monthsfrom 07-02-2014 to 06-08-2014 in the department of surgery combined military hospital Quetta.Methodology: A total of 190 patients were included in this study. wound was observed fordevelopment of surgical site infection post operatively within seven days by the assignedinvestigator who was unaware of the wound study design. surgical site infection was assessedusing Southampton wound grading. Results: Mean age of the patients was 30.89±10.38 and32.74±9.52 in group A and B, respectively. in group-A, 73 patients (76.8%) and in group-B 66patients (69.5%) were male while 22 patients (23.2%) of group-A and 29 patients (30.5%) ingroup-B were female.in group-A surgical site infection was observed in 29 patients (30.5%)and in group-B 12 patients (12.6%) were having surgical site infection. statistically significantdifference was found between two groups (p=0.003). Conclusion: The frequency of surgicalsite infection was significantly lower after delayed primary closure of dirty wounds as comparedto primary closure.

scholarly journals A prospective study in peritonitis patients to compare the impact of subcutaneous negative suction closure, conventional primary closure of skin and subcutaneous tissue and open skin technique following laparotomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3293
Author(s):  
Mano Zac Mathews ◽  
Sriram Gopalakrishnaiah Subramanyam ◽  
Nivedita Mitta
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Abdominal Wall Closure ◽  
Suction Drain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Negative Suction

Background: Abdominal wall closure in the presence of sepsis presents a challenge to the surgeon. The objective of this study is to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each method to individualise the techniques based on patient profile about surgical site infection, duration of hospitalisation and morbidity.Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted among 102 operated patients of peritonitis in the Department of General Surgery at St John’s Medical College and Hospital. The patients were divided into three groups, group A, group B and group C. In group A, skin and subcutaneous tissue was closed after draining the subcutaneous space by a negative-suction drain. In group B, the patient’s skin and subcutaneous tissues were closed primarily with continuous sutures without negative suction drain. In group C, the laparotomy wound was closed and the skin was left open. And the outcome compared in the form of wound infection, hospital stay and morbidity. Patients on immunosuppressive therapy and paediatric patients were excluded. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded at the time of admission. SPSS version 18 was used for analysis.Results: The study showed male preponderance and the mean age was 43.2 years. Duodenal perforation was the commonest cause of peritonitis in this study (38.2%). Incidence of surgical site infection was less in Group A (20.6%) compared to group B (52.9%) and group C (29.4%). Duration of hospital stay was also less in Group A patients (9.3±3.6 days) compared to other two groups. 37 patients who were included in the study were diabetic, out of which 25 patients (67.6%) developed surgical site infection.Conclusions: It can be concluded from this study that abdominal wall closure using a sub cutaneous negative suction drain in peritonitis cases reduces the incidence of surgical site infection, duration of hospital stays, subsequent surgeries related to wound dehiscence and its associated morbidity.  

scholarly journals EPIDURAL ANAESTHESIA;

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 894-904
Author(s):  
CHOUDRY AMJAD ALI ◽  
RAHEEL AZHAR KHAN ◽  
AMJAD IQBAL ◽  
Tasadaq Khurshid
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Epidural Anaesthesia ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the, post op analgesia, vomiting, shivering, length of hospital stay, peri-operative haemodynamicchanges and recovery time in patient under going open cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia versus those receiving epiduralanaesthesia. Study design: Quasi experimental study. Place and duration of study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi from 15 October2007 to 15 April 2008. Methodology: American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status (PS) I and II patient of either genderundergoing un-complicated open cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups, group A (n=30) received general anaesthesia (GA)and group B (n=29) received thoracic epidural anaesthesia (EA). Patients of both the groups were assessed for peri-operative haemodynamicchanges, recovery time, post op analgesia, vomiting and length of hospital stay. Chi-square test was applied to compare the two groups andobtain P-value. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 9 out of 30 patients (30%) of group “A” (general anaesthesia) and4 out of 29 patients (13.79%) in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia) had vomiting. Shivering was seen in 3 out of 30 (10%) in group “A” (generalanaesthesia) and 1 out of 29 (3.44%) patient in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia). Urinary retention was seen in 1 out of 30 (3.33%) in group “A”(general anaesthesia) and 8 out of 29 (27.5%) in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia). Urinary retention was relieved by psychotherapy. None ofthe patient required catheterization. Post operative recovery from surgery was determined by gastrointestinal motility (passage of flatus andstart of oral sips). In group “A” (general anaesthesia) 6 patients (20%) started oral sips in first post operative day, 16 patients (53.33%) onsecond post operative day, 8 patients (26.66%) in third post operative day. In the group “B” (epidural anaesthesia) 13 patients (44.8%) startedoral sips on first post operative day, 15 (51.72%) on second post operative day and one patient (3.44%) on third post operative day. Regardingthe length of hospital stay 17 patient (56.66%) of group “A” (general anaesthesia) were discharge by third post operative day and 22 patient(75.77) were discharge by third post operative day in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia). Conclusions: The use of intra-operative epiduralanaesthesia combined with postoperative epidural analgesia was found to be associated with reduction in the post operative pain and vomitingin patients under going open cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Superficial surgical site infections following stone and non-stone bile duct surgery- A comparative analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 458-462
Author(s):  
Chishti Tanhar Bakth Choudhury ◽  
BH Nazma Yasmeen ◽  
Manir Hossain Khan ◽  
AHM Towhidul Alam ◽  
Shirin Akhter
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Stone Disease ◽  
P Value ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Causative Agents ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background : Superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) is a vital issue after biliary surgery. Surgical site infections remain a major cause of illness in the post-operative period. Objectives : The purpose of the present study was to compare the number of wound infection and the causative organism of surgical site infection of patient of stone and non-stone bile duct surgery. Methodology : This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Surgery at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka from May 2017 to April 2018 for a period of 12 months. Patients presented with biliary disease of stone and non-stone variety were selected as study population. Patients were divided into 2 groups designated as group A and group B. Patients with the biliary stone disease were enrolled in group A and the biliary nonstone disease patients were in the group B. Patients were followed up in the postoperative period up to 2 weeks to find out the incidence of wound infection and its risk factors, causative agents, and some other variables. Certain variables were closely monitored to find the postoperative outcome as these variables were standard parameters in assessment of the outcome of the study. Results : A total number of 50 patients were recruited for this study of which 25 patients were enrolled in group A and the 25 patients were enrolled in group B. Mean age was 42.48 ± 17.21 years in group A and 40.04 ± 21.37 years in group B. The difference was not statistically significant ( p=0.659). Males were predominant in both groups. Male female ratio was 1.77:1 and 1.08:1 in group A and group B respectively. Inflammatory evidence of gall bladder with pericholecystic collection was found in 5 (20%) and 6 (24%) patients in group A and group B. There was evidence of cholangitis in 8 (32%) and 4 (16%) patients in group A and group B respectively. Evidence of inflammation at the wound site, was found in 14 (56%) patients in group A and 7 (28%) patients in group B. There was statistically significant difference between these 2 groups in the incidence of superficial surgical site infection, ( p value is 0.045). Regarding per operative collected bile, we found E. Coli in 4 cases in group A and 3 cases in group B ( p value is 0.408). Klebsiella spp. was found in 1 patient in group A. Wound swab C/S identified E. Coli in 1 patient in group A. Staph aureus was found in 1 and 2 patients in group A and group B respectively ( p value is nonsignificant). Conclusion : In conclusion, there is a difference in the incidence of occurrence of surgical site infection and causative agents after stone and non-stone bile duct surgery. Stone disease has increased chance of wound infection than nonstone disease of bile ducts. Northern International Medical College Journal Vol.11 (2) Jan 2020: 458-462

Compare outcome of simple excision with primary closure vs rhomboid excision with limberg flap for pilonidal sinus

2021 ◽  
pp. 2920-2922
Author(s):  
M. Kaleem ◽  
F. Mubarik ◽  
M. U. Afzal ◽  
A. Zahid ◽  
W. I. Andrabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Advancement Flap ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽  
P Value ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Simple Excision ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Rhomboid Excision

Background: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is a common condition usually affecting young-to-middle-aged men. For managing sacrococcygeal pilonidal illness, a variety of lateralizing surgical flap procedures based on this principle have been published, including the Karydakis flap, Limberg flap, modified Limberg flap, Z-plasty, and Y-V advancement flap. Aim: To compare the outcome of simple excision with primary closure versus rhomboid excision with limberg flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Methodology: Randomized control study conducted in Surgery Department, Ghurki Trust Hospital, Lahore. 90 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected from wards and were randomly divided in two equal groups. In group A, patients underwent rhomboid excision with limberg flap. In group B, patients underwent simple excision with primary closure. The operation was performed under spinal anesthesia. After surgery, patients were evaluated every 24 hours if they are able to move on their own then they were discharged and hospital stay was noted. Then after 10 days, patients will be called in OPD for assessment of wound healing. If wound did heal and patient complained of pain (VAS>4) and cannot sit and have fever (temp>100oF) Results: The average age in group A was 44.37±15.42 years while that in group B was 45.24±14.50 years. In group A there were 23(51.1%) males and 22 (48.9%) females whereas in group B there were 25(55.6%) males and 20(44.4%) females. There was difference significant in the mean stay in hospital in both groups (p-value=0.002). Conclusion: The conclusion of the study, that primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease and rhomboid excision with Limberg's flap is an effective treatment. Keywords: Simple Excision with Primary Closure, Rhomboid Excision, Limberg Flap, Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of nebulised 3% saline versus nebulised 0.9% saline in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1182
Author(s):  
Pragalatha Kumar A. ◽  
Indhuja Rajarathinam ◽  
Aruna Gowdra
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is the most common respiratory tract infection in young children. Despite the high prevalence of acute bronchiolitis, no consensus exists on the management. Studies have shown that except oxygen therapy, no other treatment found to be effective. Hence, the present study was conducted to find out the efficacy of nebulised 3% saline versus is 0.9% saline for the treatment of acute bronchiolitis.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study of 150 children between the age group of 2 months to 24 months with signs and symptoms of Acute Bronchiolitis admitted to Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore from January 2016 to December 2016 formed the study group, they were randomized into 2 groups, one received 3% saline nebulization and the other received 0.9% saline.Results: A total of 150 children were enrolled in the study, 75 children (group A) received 0.9% saline and 75 children (group B) received 3% saline. At 24 hours, the mean clinical severity score for group A was 2.49±1.03 and group B was 2.16±0.49 (P=0.013). The duration of hospital stay was shorter (1-3 days) in 3% saline with a mean of 2.35 days and was longer (3-5 days) in 0.9% saline with mean value of 4.04 days which was statistically significant (p <0.001).Conclusions: 3% saline nebulization can be used as an effective treatment for acute bronchiolitis. It significantly reduced the clinical severity score and length of hospital stay compared to 0.9% normal saline.

scholarly journals Intra-incisional versus intravenous route of antibiotic administration in preventing surgical site infections: a randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1438
Author(s):  
Aditya N. Patil ◽  
Veerendra M. Uppin
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Intravenous Route ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common postoperative complications following abdominal surgeries. Whilst the use of prophylactic antibiotics has been shown to reduce postoperative wound infection, controversy still remains as to the optimum route of administration and the duration of treatment. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a preoperative single dose of a cephalosporin antibiotic (cefotaxime) administered intraincisionally versus that administered intravenously, in preventing postoperative surgical site infections following appendicectomy.Methods: Sixty consecutive cases diagnosed as uncomplicated appendicitis who consented for open appendicectomy at a tertiary care institute were included in the study. Cases were randomized to 2 comparable groups of 30 patients each. Preoperatively, patients in Group A received a single dose of Inj. Cefotaxime 1g intraincisionally while those in Group B received the same intravenously. Incision sites were examined every alternative day starting on postoperative day 3 until removal of sutures. Signs of surgical site infection, if any, were recorded and outcomes were statistically tested for significance.Results: One patient in Group A (3.3%) and 4 patients in Group B (13.3%) showed signs of postoperative surgical site infection (p >0.05) during the follow up period which prolonged their hospital stay.Conclusions: This study showed that a single dose preoperative intraincisional administration of cefotaxime was as effective as intravenous administration for prevention of postoperative surgical site infection after open appendicectomy. Although the difference was not statistically significant, there was a reduced incidence of SSI in individuals who received intraincisional antibiotic. These results are encouraging for a way forward in reducing unnecessary burdening of systemic antibiotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. 

EP.TH.959Meta-analysis of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer surgery: An ongoing dilemma

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahin Hajibandeh ◽  
Shahab Hajibandeh ◽  
Pratik Bhattacharya ◽  
Reza Zakaria ◽  
Christopher Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Loop Ileostomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Ileostomy Closure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Cancer Resection

Abstract Aims To evaluate comparative outcomes of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection. Methods We systematic searched MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; CENTRAL; the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; ISRCTN Register, and bibliographic reference lists. Overall perioperative complications, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, ileus and length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome parameters. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effects models. Results We identified 4 studies reporting a total of 436 patients comparing outcomes of temporary loop ileostomy closure during (n = 185) or after (n = 251) adjuvant chemotherapy following colorectal cancer resection. There was no significant difference in overall perioperative complications (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.82-2.36, p = 0.22), anastomotic leak (OR 2.80; 95% CI 0.47-16.56, p = 0.26), surgical site infection (OR 1.97; 95% CI 0.80-4.90, p = 0.14), ileus (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.50-2.96, p = 0.66) or length of hospital stay (MD 0.02; 95% CI -0.85-0.89, p = 0.97) between two groups. Between-study heterogeneity was low in all analyses. Conclusions The meta-analysis of best, albeit limited, available evidence suggests that temporary loop ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection may be associated with comparable outcomes to closure of ileostomy after adjuvant chemotherapy. We encourage future research to concentrate on completeness of chemotherapy and quality of life which can determine appropriateness of either approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document