scholarly journals SURGICAL SITE INFECTION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1770-1774
Author(s):  
Syed Muhammad Asar Hussain ◽  
Saadat Ali Janjua ◽  
Amna Fareed ◽  
Asrar Ahmad ◽  
Irum Saleem
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Trial Duration ◽  
Primary Wound Closure ◽  
Delayed Primary Closure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare the frequency of surgical site infection after primaryand delayed primary wound closure in dirty abdominal wounds. Study Design: Randomizedcontrolled trial. Duration and Setting: This study was carried out over a period of six monthsfrom 07-02-2014 to 06-08-2014 in the department of surgery combined military hospital Quetta.Methodology: A total of 190 patients were included in this study. wound was observed fordevelopment of surgical site infection post operatively within seven days by the assignedinvestigator who was unaware of the wound study design. surgical site infection was assessedusing Southampton wound grading. Results: Mean age of the patients was 30.89±10.38 and32.74±9.52 in group A and B, respectively. in group-A, 73 patients (76.8%) and in group-B 66patients (69.5%) were male while 22 patients (23.2%) of group-A and 29 patients (30.5%) ingroup-B were female.in group-A surgical site infection was observed in 29 patients (30.5%)and in group-B 12 patients (12.6%) were having surgical site infection. statistically significantdifference was found between two groups (p=0.003). Conclusion: The frequency of surgicalsite infection was significantly lower after delayed primary closure of dirty wounds as comparedto primary closure.

scholarly journals Comparing SSI In Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Sabih Nofal ◽  
Anum Arif ◽  
Ahsan Khan ◽  
Sundus Saif ◽  
Abdul Waheed Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Purse String ◽  
Stoma Reversal ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the frequency of Surgical Site Infection ( SSI ) and mean length of hospital stay between the Purse-string closure and conventional primary closure techniques for stoma reversal. Methods: The study was carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital Lahore from January 5, 2018 to July 5, 2018. The study designed as a Observational Study. Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy were randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients were called for follow up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups were checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay. The data was statistically analyzed by using SPSS v23.0.t test (independent sample) used for the comparison of hospital stay mean. Chi-square was also used for the comparison of the frequencies of SSI. Data were stratified for gender and age. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered as significant. Results: A total of 140 patients were enrolled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups i.e. Group- A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). In group-A, mean duration of hospital stay was 5.7±1.0 days, while 7.3±1.1 days in group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.000. In group-A, surgical site infection was in 4(5.7%) patients, while 11(15.7%) patients of group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.046. Conclusion: The frequency of surgical site infection and mean length of hospital stay after stoma reversal, purse-string suturing technique is significantly less than conventional primary closure technique. Key Words: Surgical stoma; Ileostomy; Closure; Infection. How to cite: Nofal S., Arif A., Khan A., Saif. S., Khan W.A., Arif A. Comparing SSI in Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal. Esculapio 2021; 17(01): 15-19

scholarly journals Intra-incisional versus intravenous route of antibiotic administration in preventing surgical site infections: a randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1438
Author(s):  
Aditya N. Patil ◽  
Veerendra M. Uppin
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Intravenous Route ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common postoperative complications following abdominal surgeries. Whilst the use of prophylactic antibiotics has been shown to reduce postoperative wound infection, controversy still remains as to the optimum route of administration and the duration of treatment. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a preoperative single dose of a cephalosporin antibiotic (cefotaxime) administered intraincisionally versus that administered intravenously, in preventing postoperative surgical site infections following appendicectomy.Methods: Sixty consecutive cases diagnosed as uncomplicated appendicitis who consented for open appendicectomy at a tertiary care institute were included in the study. Cases were randomized to 2 comparable groups of 30 patients each. Preoperatively, patients in Group A received a single dose of Inj. Cefotaxime 1g intraincisionally while those in Group B received the same intravenously. Incision sites were examined every alternative day starting on postoperative day 3 until removal of sutures. Signs of surgical site infection, if any, were recorded and outcomes were statistically tested for significance.Results: One patient in Group A (3.3%) and 4 patients in Group B (13.3%) showed signs of postoperative surgical site infection (p >0.05) during the follow up period which prolonged their hospital stay.Conclusions: This study showed that a single dose preoperative intraincisional administration of cefotaxime was as effective as intravenous administration for prevention of postoperative surgical site infection after open appendicectomy. Although the difference was not statistically significant, there was a reduced incidence of SSI in individuals who received intraincisional antibiotic. These results are encouraging for a way forward in reducing unnecessary burdening of systemic antibiotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. 

scholarly journals Delayed Primary Closure of Wound Prevents Wound Infection after Surgery in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
Md Aslam Hossain ◽  
Md Julfiqur Rahman Khan ◽  
SM Rokonuzzaman ◽  
Md Maniruzzaman Khan ◽  
Md Mobaraque Hossain Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Jaundice ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Septic Complications ◽  
Delayed Primary Closure ◽  
Experimental Group

Surgery in jaundiced patients is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications compared with surgery in non jaundiced patients. These complications primarily consists of septic complications, hemorrhage, superficial surgical site infection (SSSI), wound dehiscence and renal disorders. Of them Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is found more commonly than other. This study was done to evaluate the effect of delayed primary closure on preventing wound infection than that of primary closure of wound after surgery in patients with obstructive jaundice. This randomized clinical trial was carried out at the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic division of Department of Surgery in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from July 2012 to June 2013. A total of 88 patients were included in this study who underwent surgical intervention for obstructive jaundice. These patients were divided into two groups randomly; control group (n=44) who underwent primary closure of the wound and experimental group (n=44) who underwent delayed primary closure of the wound. Patients demography, clinical presentation, comorbidities, pre, per and post operative variables and outcome were compared between two groups. Mean age of the patients of experimental and control group was 47.91± 14.63 and 42.25±12.13 years respectively. Duration of jaundice was significantly higher in experimental group 4.91±2.87 months than in control group 3.10±1.62 months. Postoperative wound infection was found significantly higher in control group (43.2%) than that of experimental group (11.4%). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in control group (18.77± 6.24 days) than in experimental group (13.52±3.61 days). Delayed primary closure of wound reduces wound infection significantly than primary closure of wound in patients with obstructive jaundice. Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jan 2019;14(1): 37-40

scholarly journals Abdominal Wound Closure in Gynaecological or Obstetrical Surgery with Vicryl® (Polyglactin910) Versus Vicryl Plus® (Polyglactin910 with Triclosan Added): A Comparative Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
Binod Kumar Mahaseth
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Johnson Company

Background: Surgical site infection is the most common post-surgical complication in surgical patients. The incidence of surgical site infection varies from 3-20% (or even more) in different part of the world. To date, the best method and material for skin closure has not been recommended by anybody. Triclosan is an antiseptic agent used for coating a suture material to prevent the infections. This case-controlled study was carried out to determine the comparative efficacy of sutures; Objective: This case-controlled study was carried out to determine the comparative efficacy of sutures: vicryl® and vicryl plus® (triclosan, an antiseptic incorporated with suture), in reducing surgical site infection in laparotomy for clean Gyn/Obs operations. Material and method: This case-controlled study was carried out in Dept. Of Gynae/Obs at Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur. The period of the study was from Jan 2018 to January 2019. A total of 50 participants were enrolled in the study, who met the inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into two groups A and B, each consisting of 25 patients. The patients were allocated in the groups alternately to remove bias. The Group A consisted of patients where Vicrylplus® (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson Company, Ahmadabad, India) polyglactin910 with triclosan) was used and Group B consisted of patients where vicryl ® (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson Company, Ahmadabad, India) polyglactin910 alone) was used. Patients whose abdominal wounds were found infected, pus swab for culture were taken and sent for aerobic culture and sensitivity. All patients received ceftriaxone and metronidazole single dose before operations prophylactically. Result: Surgical site infection ingroup A was 3 cases out of 25 (12%) and in group B it was 6 cases out of 25(24%). Triclosan added polyglactin910 suture found to be statistically non significant concerning prevention of SSI as compared to polyglactin910 (p=0.472). The mean age of the study population was in group A was (29.76±7.47) and in group B was (27.12±7.42).

scholarly journals Prophylactic use of antibiotics as per SIGN 104 guidelines versus routine antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical site infection in clean and clean contaminated ENT surgical procedures: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
M. Bharath ◽  
J. R. Galagali ◽  
Awadhesh Kumar Mishra ◽  
Ajay Mallick ◽  
E. Nikhilesh
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prophylactic Use ◽  
Group B ◽  
Clean Contaminated

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Many clinicians continue to use antibiotic prophylaxis routinely in all surgical procedures, ignoring the guidelines issued by policy makers. In this prospective study we compared the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients who received prophylactic antibiotics as a routine; with the rate of SSI in patients getting antibiotics strictly as per SIGN 104 Guidelines, for clean and clean contaminated procedures.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The study population comprised 235 patients. Group A consisted of 119 patients having 77 (65%) males and 42 (35%) females while Group B had 116 patients - 71 (61%) males and 45 (39%) females. Group A received routine antibiotic prophylaxis in all cases, while Group B received antibiotic prophylaxis as per SIGN 104 guidelines only. Both the groups were followed up for one month post-operatively for SSI and complications.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> SSI occurred in 2 patients (1.68%) in Group A and in 3 (2.59%) patients in Group B. There was no significant difference in the rate of SSI between the two groups (p=0.68). Procedure wise maximum SSI occurred in tympanoplasty and laryngectomy. Due to infection one case of tympanoplasty had graft failure and one case of laryngectomy had delayed wound healing. No major complications related to infection or antibiotic use occurred in either group.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Selective use of antibiotic prophylaxis as per SIGN 104 Guidelines does not lead to increase in SSI in clean and clean contaminated ENT procedures.</p>

scholarly journals A comparative study of open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Singh ◽  
Sumit Kumar Gupta ◽  
Mukesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Cholelithiasis is a major cause of morbidity among Indians with a female preponderance. Most of the cases of gallstones are asymptomatic. For a long time, open cholecystectomy (OC) used to be the surgical treatment for cholelithiasis. But with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been a gradual shift in the treatment with most surgeons preferring LC over OC. Apart from the benefits of decreased hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain and earlier return to normal activity LC are also cosmetically better as compared to OC. Longer operative time and increased incidence of biliary leakage are some pitfalls of LC in initial phase of surgical practice.Methods: A prospective study of 100 patients was carried out in the department of surgery in IQ city medical college and Durgapur city hospital, Durgapur between January 2017 and August 2017 with the aim of comparing open cholecystectomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery while Group B patients underwent open surgery for cholelithiasis.Results: Duration of surgery was longer in OC than LC (72.4min versus 44.7min.). Mean duration of post-operative pain was 18.3hrs in group A as compared to mean duration of 30.7hrs in group B patients. The mean period of post-operative hospital stay was 1.8 days in group A and 4.8 days in group B. Post-operative resumption of normal diet was possible in 2.1 days in OC while it took lesser time (1.2 days) in LC. The rate of surgical site infection was higher in OC as compared to LC.Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended as first choice operative treatment for patients with cholelithiasis as it provides better cosmetic results, lesser pain, lesser post-operative hospital stay and fewer incidence of surgical site infection.

scholarly journals Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Liehua Liu ◽  
Lei Luo ◽  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Qiang Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Management Strategy ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Early Infection ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Site ◽  
Delayed Infection ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Aim. To research the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation and its management strategy. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed all cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation performed from January 2010 to December 2019, and the data from patients with SSI were collected. The observational indicators included the incidence of SSI, general information of the patients, surgical details, inflammatory indicators, pathogenic bacteria, and treatment. SSI was defined as both early infection and delayed infection, and the cases were divided into Groups A and B, respectively. The relevant indicators and treatment were compared between the two groups. Results. A total of 1125 cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation were followed up. Twenty-five cases of SSI occurred, and the incidence of SSI was 2.22% (25/1125). There were 14 cases of early infection (1.24%) and 11 cases of delayed infection (0.98%). Fourteen cases of early infection occurred 12.3 ± 8.3 days postoperatively (3–30), and 11 cases of delayed infection occurred 33.3 ± 18.9 months postoperatively (3–62). The inflammatory indicators of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B (all P < 0.05 ), except for procalcitonin. The main infection site in Group A was located on the skin and subcutaneous tissue and around the internal instrument, while the main infection site in Group B was around the internal instrument. The main treatment for Group A was debridement and implant replacement, and the main treatment for Group B was implant removal. Summary. The incidence of SSI following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation was 2.22%, the incidence of early SSI was 1.24%, and the incidence of delayed SSI was 0.98%. If the main infection site of early infection is in the incision, debridement should be the main treatment method; if the infection site is around the internal fixation, implant replacement is recommended on the basis of debridement. Once delayed infection is diagnosed, implant removal is suggested.

scholarly journals Management of surgical site infection post-open reduction and internal fixation for tibial plateau fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 380-387
Author(s):  
Jie Shen ◽  
Dong Sun ◽  
Jingshu Fu ◽  
Shulin Wang ◽  
Xiaohua Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Tibial Plateau ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Induced Membrane ◽  
Membrane Technique ◽  
Induced Membrane Technique ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Aims In contrast to operations performed for other fractures, there is a high incidence rate of surgical site infection (SSI) post-open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) done for tibial plateau fractures (TPFs). This study investigates the effect of induced membrane technique combined with internal fixation for managing SSI in TPF patients who underwent ORIF. Methods From April 2013 to May 2017, 46 consecutive patients with SSI post-ORIF for TPFs were managed in our centre with an induced membrane technique. Of these, 35 patients were included for this study, with data analyzed in a retrospective manner. Results All participants were monitored for a mean of 36 months (24 to 62). None were subjected to amputations. A total of 21 patients underwent two-stage surgeries (Group A), with 14 patients who did not receive second-stage surgery (Group B). Group A did not experience infection recurrence, and no implant or cement spacer loosening was noted in Group B for at least 24 months of follow-up. No significant difference was noted in the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) between the two groups. The clinical healing time was significantly shorter in Group B (p＜0.001). Those with longer duration of infection had poorer functional status (p＜0.001). Conclusion Management of SSI post-ORIF for TPF with induced membrane technique combined with internal fixation represents a feasible mode of treatment with satisfactory outcomes in terms of infection control and functional recovery. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):380–387.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document