Comparative study of linear closure technique versur purse string closure technique of skin closure in stoma reversal.

Objectives: To compare the results of linear closure technique with purse string closure technique in terms of surgical site infection, wound healing (scar cosmesis) and wound length. Study Design: Comparative Study. Setting: Surgical Unit V, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad. Period: January 2016 to January 2019. Material & Methods: A total of 100 patients were operated in our unit during the study period & were allocated into two groups randomly: Group A (Linear closure) Group B (Purse string closure) included 50 patients in each group. The primary outcome measures were, surgical site infection, wound healing (scar cosmesis) and wound length. Results: During follow up period Surgical site infection was noted in 17 patients out of 100 with 14 patients in Group A and 03 Patients in Group B (p value 0.002). Regarding wound healing 60% patients were having good scar and 20% patients were having satisfactory and 20% having poor scar in Group A. while in Group B 82% patients were having good scar and 18% patients were having satisfactory scar (p value 0.00). Mean wound length in Group A was 5.14 with SD 1.2978 while in Group B mean length was 3.8 with SD 1.3095. Conclusion: Our study concludes that purse string closure is superior to linear closure technique in terms of surgical site infection, wound healing (scar cosmesis) and wound length.

Download Full-text

Comparing SSI In Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal

Esculapio ◽

10.51273/esc21.251713 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 17 (1) ◽

pp. 15-19

Author(s):

Sabih Nofal ◽

Anum Arif ◽

Ahsan Khan ◽

Sundus Saif ◽

Abdul Waheed Khan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Site Infection ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Primary Closure ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

P Value ◽

Site Infection ◽

Purse String ◽

Stoma Reversal ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Objective: To compare the frequency of Surgical Site Infection ( SSI ) and mean length of hospital stay between the Purse-string closure and conventional primary closure techniques for stoma reversal. Methods: The study was carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital Lahore from January 5, 2018 to July 5, 2018. The study designed as a Observational Study. Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy were randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients were called for follow up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups were checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay. The data was statistically analyzed by using SPSS v23.0.t test (independent sample) used for the comparison of hospital stay mean. Chi-square was also used for the comparison of the frequencies of SSI. Data were stratified for gender and age. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered as significant. Results: A total of 140 patients were enrolled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups i.e. Group- A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). In group-A, mean duration of hospital stay was 5.7±1.0 days, while 7.3±1.1 days in group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.000. In group-A, surgical site infection was in 4(5.7%) patients, while 11(15.7%) patients of group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.046. Conclusion: The frequency of surgical site infection and mean length of hospital stay after stoma reversal, purse-string suturing technique is significantly less than conventional primary closure technique. Key Words: Surgical stoma; Ileostomy; Closure; Infection. How to cite: Nofal S., Arif A., Khan A., Saif. S., Khan W.A., Arif A. Comparing SSI in Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal. Esculapio 2021; 17(01): 15-19

Download Full-text

Superficial surgical site infections following stone and non-stone bile duct surgery- A comparative analysis

Northern International Medical College Journal ◽

10.3329/nimcj.v11i2.54061 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 458-462

Author(s):

Chishti Tanhar Bakth Choudhury ◽

BH Nazma Yasmeen ◽

Manir Hossain Khan ◽

AHM Towhidul Alam ◽

Shirin Akhter

Keyword(s):

Bile Duct ◽

Surgical Site Infection ◽

Wound Infection ◽

Surgical Site Infections ◽

Stone Disease ◽

P Value ◽

Site Infection ◽

Causative Agents ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background : Superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) is a vital issue after biliary surgery. Surgical site infections remain a major cause of illness in the post-operative period. Objectives : The purpose of the present study was to compare the number of wound infection and the causative organism of surgical site infection of patient of stone and non-stone bile duct surgery. Methodology : This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Surgery at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka from May 2017 to April 2018 for a period of 12 months. Patients presented with biliary disease of stone and non-stone variety were selected as study population. Patients were divided into 2 groups designated as group A and group B. Patients with the biliary stone disease were enrolled in group A and the biliary nonstone disease patients were in the group B. Patients were followed up in the postoperative period up to 2 weeks to find out the incidence of wound infection and its risk factors, causative agents, and some other variables. Certain variables were closely monitored to find the postoperative outcome as these variables were standard parameters in assessment of the outcome of the study. Results : A total number of 50 patients were recruited for this study of which 25 patients were enrolled in group A and the 25 patients were enrolled in group B. Mean age was 42.48 ± 17.21 years in group A and 40.04 ± 21.37 years in group B. The difference was not statistically significant ( p=0.659). Males were predominant in both groups. Male female ratio was 1.77:1 and 1.08:1 in group A and group B respectively. Inflammatory evidence of gall bladder with pericholecystic collection was found in 5 (20%) and 6 (24%) patients in group A and group B. There was evidence of cholangitis in 8 (32%) and 4 (16%) patients in group A and group B respectively. Evidence of inflammation at the wound site, was found in 14 (56%) patients in group A and 7 (28%) patients in group B. There was statistically significant difference between these 2 groups in the incidence of superficial surgical site infection, ( p value is 0.045). Regarding per operative collected bile, we found E. Coli in 4 cases in group A and 3 cases in group B ( p value is 0.408). Klebsiella spp. was found in 1 patient in group A. Wound swab C/S identified E. Coli in 1 patient in group A. Staph aureus was found in 1 and 2 patients in group A and group B respectively ( p value is nonsignificant). Conclusion : In conclusion, there is a difference in the incidence of occurrence of surgical site infection and causative agents after stone and non-stone bile duct surgery. Stone disease has increased chance of wound infection than nonstone disease of bile ducts. Northern International Medical College Journal Vol.11 (2) Jan 2020: 458-462

Download Full-text

Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in the Treatment of Primary Pterygium: A Comparative Study of Two Techniques

Journal of Postgraduate Medicine Education and Research ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1091 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 48 (1) ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Reema Bansal ◽

R Sehgal

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Amniotic Membrane ◽

Free Edge ◽

Amniotic Membrane Transplantation ◽

Human Amniotic Membrane ◽

Purse String ◽

Group A ◽

End To End ◽

Group B ◽

Primary Pterygium

ABSTRACT Purpose To compare two techniques of human amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) following pterygium excision: (1) end to end suturing of the amniotic membrane graft (AMG) with the conjunctiva versus (2) a new technique of purse-string suturing of the AMG and tucking of AMG under the free edge of conjunctiva. Materials and methods Pterygium surgery with human AMT was done in 42 eyes with primary pterygium. Twenty four eyes (group A) underwent end-to-end suturing of AMG with conjunctiva. Eighteen eyes (group B) underwent purse-string suturing of AMG with underlying sclera with free edge of AMG tucked under conjunctiva on three sides. The two groups were compared in terms of the outcome measures, i.e. complete epithelialization time of AMG and recurrence of pterygium within 1 year. Results The complete epithelialization of AMG occurred in 21 days (range 14 to 28 days) and 14 days (range 7 to 21 days) in groups A and B respectively. In group A, 7 eyes (29.17%) developed recurrence. In group B, 2 eyes (11.11%) developed recurrence. Conclusion Purse string suturing and tucking of AMG resulted in faster epithelization of AMG and lower recurrences in comparison with end to end suturing of AMG in the management of primary pterygium. How to cite this article Bansal R, Jain AK, Sehgal R. Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in the Treatment of Primary Pterygium: A Comparative Study of Two Techniques. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2014;48(1):1-7.

Download Full-text

Intra-incisional versus intravenous route of antibiotic administration in preventing surgical site infections: a randomized controlled trial

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181126 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 1438

Author(s):

Aditya N. Patil ◽

Veerendra M. Uppin

Keyword(s):

Single Dose ◽

Surgical Site Infection ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Surgical Site Infections ◽

Intravenous Route ◽

Antibiotic Administration ◽

Site Infection ◽

Open Appendicectomy ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common postoperative complications following abdominal surgeries. Whilst the use of prophylactic antibiotics has been shown to reduce postoperative wound infection, controversy still remains as to the optimum route of administration and the duration of treatment. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a preoperative single dose of a cephalosporin antibiotic (cefotaxime) administered intraincisionally versus that administered intravenously, in preventing postoperative surgical site infections following appendicectomy.Methods: Sixty consecutive cases diagnosed as uncomplicated appendicitis who consented for open appendicectomy at a tertiary care institute were included in the study. Cases were randomized to 2 comparable groups of 30 patients each. Preoperatively, patients in Group A received a single dose of Inj. Cefotaxime 1g intraincisionally while those in Group B received the same intravenously. Incision sites were examined every alternative day starting on postoperative day 3 until removal of sutures. Signs of surgical site infection, if any, were recorded and outcomes were statistically tested for significance.Results: One patient in Group A (3.3%) and 4 patients in Group B (13.3%) showed signs of postoperative surgical site infection (p >0.05) during the follow up period which prolonged their hospital stay.Conclusions: This study showed that a single dose preoperative intraincisional administration of cefotaxime was as effective as intravenous administration for prevention of postoperative surgical site infection after open appendicectomy. Although the difference was not statistically significant, there was a reduced incidence of SSI in individuals who received intraincisional antibiotic. These results are encouraging for a way forward in reducing unnecessary burdening of systemic antibiotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.

Download Full-text

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association ◽

10.47391/jpma.03-1303 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Muhammad Ahmad ◽

Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽

Amna Javaid ◽

Naveed Arshad ◽

Falak Shair

Keyword(s):

Wound Healing ◽

Operative Time ◽

Harmonic Scalpel ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

P Value ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Complete Wound Healing ◽

Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

Download Full-text

Abdominal Wound Closure in Gynaecological or Obstetrical Surgery with Vicryl® (Polyglactin910) Versus Vicryl Plus® (Polyglactin910 with Triclosan Added): A Comparative Study

Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College ◽

10.3126/jngmc.v17i1.25307 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 17 (1) ◽

pp. 10-12

Author(s):

Binod Kumar Mahaseth

Keyword(s):

Surgical Site Infection ◽

Surgical Complication ◽

College Teaching ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Skin Closure ◽

Site Infection ◽

Comparative Efficacy ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Johnson Company

Background: Surgical site infection is the most common post-surgical complication in surgical patients. The incidence of surgical site infection varies from 3-20% (or even more) in different part of the world. To date, the best method and material for skin closure has not been recommended by anybody. Triclosan is an antiseptic agent used for coating a suture material to prevent the infections. This case-controlled study was carried out to determine the comparative efficacy of sutures; Objective: This case-controlled study was carried out to determine the comparative efficacy of sutures: vicryl® and vicryl plus® (triclosan, an antiseptic incorporated with suture), in reducing surgical site infection in laparotomy for clean Gyn/Obs operations. Material and method: This case-controlled study was carried out in Dept. Of Gynae/Obs at Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur. The period of the study was from Jan 2018 to January 2019. A total of 50 participants were enrolled in the study, who met the inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into two groups A and B, each consisting of 25 patients. The patients were allocated in the groups alternately to remove bias. The Group A consisted of patients where Vicrylplus® (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson Company, Ahmadabad, India) polyglactin910 with triclosan) was used and Group B consisted of patients where vicryl ® (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson Company, Ahmadabad, India) polyglactin910 alone) was used. Patients whose abdominal wounds were found infected, pus swab for culture were taken and sent for aerobic culture and sensitivity. All patients received ceftriaxone and metronidazole single dose before operations prophylactically. Result: Surgical site infection ingroup A was 3 cases out of 25 (12%) and in group B it was 6 cases out of 25(24%). Triclosan added polyglactin910 suture found to be statistically non significant concerning prevention of SSI as compared to polyglactin910 (p=0.472). The mean age of the study population was in group A was (29.76±7.47) and in group B was (27.12±7.42).

Download Full-text

Prophylactic use of antibiotics as per SIGN 104 guidelines versus routine antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical site infection in clean and clean contaminated ENT surgical procedures: a comparative study

International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery ◽

10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20195698 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 106

Author(s):

M. Bharath ◽

J. R. Galagali ◽

Awadhesh Kumar Mishra ◽

Ajay Mallick ◽

E. Nikhilesh

Keyword(s):

Surgical Site Infection ◽

Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽

Surgical Procedures ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Site Infection ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Prophylactic Use ◽

Group B ◽

Clean Contaminated

Background: Many clinicians continue to use antibiotic prophylaxis routinely in all surgical procedures, ignoring the guidelines issued by policy makers. In this prospective study we compared the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients who received prophylactic antibiotics as a routine; with the rate of SSI in patients getting antibiotics strictly as per SIGN 104 Guidelines, for clean and clean contaminated procedures.Methods: The study population comprised 235 patients. Group A consisted of 119 patients having 77 (65%) males and 42 (35%) females while Group B had 116 patients - 71 (61%) males and 45 (39%) females. Group A received routine antibiotic prophylaxis in all cases, while Group B received antibiotic prophylaxis as per SIGN 104 guidelines only. Both the groups were followed up for one month post-operatively for SSI and complications.Results: SSI occurred in 2 patients (1.68%) in Group A and in 3 (2.59%) patients in Group B. There was no significant difference in the rate of SSI between the two groups (p=0.68). Procedure wise maximum SSI occurred in tympanoplasty and laryngectomy. Due to infection one case of tympanoplasty had graft failure and one case of laryngectomy had delayed wound healing. No major complications related to infection or antibiotic use occurred in either group.Conclusions: Selective use of antibiotic prophylaxis as per SIGN 104 Guidelines does not lead to increase in SSI in clean and clean contaminated ENT procedures.

Download Full-text

A comparative study of open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175905 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 253 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Pramod Singh ◽

Sumit Kumar Gupta ◽

Mukesh Kumar

Keyword(s):

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽

Surgical Site Infection ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Open Cholecystectomy ◽

City Hospital ◽

Site Infection ◽

First Choice ◽

Duration Of Surgery ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background: Cholelithiasis is a major cause of morbidity among Indians with a female preponderance. Most of the cases of gallstones are asymptomatic. For a long time, open cholecystectomy (OC) used to be the surgical treatment for cholelithiasis. But with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been a gradual shift in the treatment with most surgeons preferring LC over OC. Apart from the benefits of decreased hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain and earlier return to normal activity LC are also cosmetically better as compared to OC. Longer operative time and increased incidence of biliary leakage are some pitfalls of LC in initial phase of surgical practice.Methods: A prospective study of 100 patients was carried out in the department of surgery in IQ city medical college and Durgapur city hospital, Durgapur between January 2017 and August 2017 with the aim of comparing open cholecystectomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery while Group B patients underwent open surgery for cholelithiasis.Results: Duration of surgery was longer in OC than LC (72.4min versus 44.7min.). Mean duration of post-operative pain was 18.3hrs in group A as compared to mean duration of 30.7hrs in group B patients. The mean period of post-operative hospital stay was 1.8 days in group A and 4.8 days in group B. Post-operative resumption of normal diet was possible in 2.1 days in OC while it took lesser time (1.2 days) in LC. The rate of surgical site infection was higher in OC as compared to LC.Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended as first choice operative treatment for patients with cholelithiasis as it provides better cosmetic results, lesser pain, lesser post-operative hospital stay and fewer incidence of surgical site infection.

Download Full-text

Partial inferior turbinectomy versus submucosal diathermy in hypertrophied inferior turbinates

International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery ◽

10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20204623 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (11) ◽

pp. 2011

Author(s):

Smitha S. Gangaraj ◽

Shilpa Thomas

Keyword(s):

Wound Healing ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Nasal Obstruction ◽

Short Term ◽

Mild Pain ◽

Group A ◽

Term Evaluation ◽

Group B ◽

Operative Assessment

Background: The study aims to compare the efficacy of submucosal diathermy and partial inferior turbinectomy in terms of improvement in nasal obstruction, pain, haemorrhage, crusting and wound healing.Methods: A prospective sequentially randomized comparative study involving fifty patients, divided into two groups of 25 patients each. Group A consists of patients who underwent SMD and group B consists of patients who underwent PIT. Post-operative assessment was done at day 1, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months.Results: Post-operative improvement in nasal obstruction was seen in both groups. 80% showed significant improvement in SMD and 32% in PIT group at the end of second week. By sixth month, 40% in SMD group and 80% in PIT group showed significant improvement. Mild pain was observed in 12% of PIT group at 2 weeks. In SMD group, 8% developed reactionary haemorrhage. In PIT group, 24% developed minimal soakage and 12% developed moderate soakage. Severe nasal crusting was seen in 64% of the cases in PIT group and in 40% of the cases in SMD group at second week. By 1 month, 44% in PIT group and 12% in SMD group showed severe crusting.Conclusions: Short term complications like pain, obstruction and haemorrhage was noted to be higher with PIT. On long term evaluation, PIT showed better results in terms of improvement in nasal obstruction scores.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation

Pain Research and Management ◽

10.1155/2021/2262837 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Liehua Liu ◽

Lei Luo ◽

Chen Zhao ◽

Qiang Zhou

Keyword(s):

Surgical Site Infection ◽

Internal Fixation ◽

Management Strategy ◽

Implant Removal ◽

Early Infection ◽

Site Infection ◽

Infection Site ◽

Delayed Infection ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Aim. To research the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation and its management strategy. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed all cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation performed from January 2010 to December 2019, and the data from patients with SSI were collected. The observational indicators included the incidence of SSI, general information of the patients, surgical details, inflammatory indicators, pathogenic bacteria, and treatment. SSI was defined as both early infection and delayed infection, and the cases were divided into Groups A and B, respectively. The relevant indicators and treatment were compared between the two groups. Results. A total of 1125 cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation were followed up. Twenty-five cases of SSI occurred, and the incidence of SSI was 2.22% (25/1125). There were 14 cases of early infection (1.24%) and 11 cases of delayed infection (0.98%). Fourteen cases of early infection occurred 12.3 ± 8.3 days postoperatively (3–30), and 11 cases of delayed infection occurred 33.3 ± 18.9 months postoperatively (3–62). The inflammatory indicators of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B (all P < 0.05 ), except for procalcitonin. The main infection site in Group A was located on the skin and subcutaneous tissue and around the internal instrument, while the main infection site in Group B was around the internal instrument. The main treatment for Group A was debridement and implant replacement, and the main treatment for Group B was implant removal. Summary. The incidence of SSI following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation was 2.22%, the incidence of early SSI was 1.24%, and the incidence of delayed SSI was 0.98%. If the main infection site of early infection is in the incision, debridement should be the main treatment method; if the infection site is around the internal fixation, implant replacement is recommended on the basis of debridement. Once delayed infection is diagnosed, implant removal is suggested.

Download Full-text