scholarly journals A study on using corrective feedbacks in teaching essays at school of foreign languages, Thai Nguyen university

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
Nhung Le Thi ◽  
Thuy Dung La Thi
Keyword(s):  
Language Learners ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Students Attitudes ◽  
Teachers Attitudes ◽  
Response Channel

The ability of writing is considered as a main communication skill and “a unique asset” in SLA (Chastain, 1998) that language learners should be fully aware of. Methodology in teaching writing therefore has experienced considerable changes in the approach to teaching and assessing learners. Written corrective feedback as a response channel to students’ writings in SLA classrooms has been a topic of inclusive debates and inquiries amongst the scholarly sphere. Contributing to this bulk of controversy, the present study investigates teachers’ perceptions and their students’ attitudes and evaluations as to the practice of error corrective feedback. To collect data, two different questionnaires of suitable reliability were delivered to sample respondents of 12 teachers and 34 students respectively to elicit data catering the study’s purposes. Findings were also triangulated with 5 participant teachers invited for follow up interviews and a comparative reference to previous studies on written corrective feedbacks. The results revealed that there are no dramatic differences in teachers’ attitudes towards the usefulness of written corrective feedbacks. However, when it comes to types and amount of errors they should comment on, teachers’ responses and preference cover a wide spectrum.

scholarly journals Second Language Learners’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Delayed Immediate Corrective Feedback in an Asynchronous Online Setting An Exploratory Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-209
Author(s):  
Laia Canals ◽  
Gisela Granena ◽  
Yucel Yilmaz ◽  
Aleksandra Malicka
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Nous Avons ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Second Language Learners ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Learning Context ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Language Courses ◽  
Oral Interaction

Online language courses that rely on asynchronous teacher-learner communication face a practical problem when it comes to the provision of immediate corrective feedback by the teacher in oral interaction tasks. In this learning context, learners can still communicate synchronously and record their interaction without the teacher being present, but feedback by the teacher will be delayed in time. Research indicates that the effectiveness of feedback decreases as the time between the error and the correction increases and that immediate feedback is more effective (Arroyo & Yilmaz, 2018; Shintani & Aubrey, 2016). In this exploratory study conducted at an online university, we implemented a novel type of feedback we referred to as delayed immediate corrective feedback (DICF) and analyzed second language learners’ and teachers’ perceptions regarding its effectiveness and usefulness. Our goal was to assess the feasibility of implementing this type of feedback in our context and, ultimately, in other contexts where communication between teachers and learners takes place asynchronously. DICF was provided by teachers orally via screencast video. Learners and teachers’ perceptions were collected via two separate questionnaires. The results showed that teachers and learners responded positively to DICF and several potential benefits were identified. Les cours de langue en ligne qui s’appuient sur la communication asynchrone enseignant-apprenant rencontrent un problème pratique quand vient le temps de fournir de la rétroaction corrective immédiate par l’enseignant lors des tâches d’interaction orale. Dans ce contexte d’apprentissage, les apprenants peuvent toujours communiquer de manière synchrone et enregistrer leur interaction sans que l’enseignant soit présent, mais la rétroaction de l’enseignant sera décalée dans le temps. La recherche indique que l’efficacité de la rétroaction diminue au fur et à mesure que le temps entre l’erreur et la correction augmente, et que la rétroaction immédiate est plus efficace (Arroyo & Yilmaz, 2018; Shintani & Aubrey, 2016). Dans cette étude exploratoire menée auprès d’une université en ligne, nous avons mis en place une nouvelle forme de rétroaction, que nous avons appelée rétroaction corrective immédiate retardée (RCIR), et nous avons analysé les perceptions des apprenants de langue seconde et des enseignants quant à son utilité et à son efficacité. Notre objectif était d’évaluer la faisabilité de mettre en place ce type de rétroaction dans notre contexte, et par extension, dans d’autres contextes où la communication entre apprenants et enseignants se passe de manière asynchrone. La RCIR a été fournie oralement par des enseignants à l’aide de vidéos d’écrans. Les perceptions des apprenants et des enseignants ont été recueillies dans deux questionnaires distincts. Les résultats ont montré qu’apprenants et enseignants ont réagi à la RCIR de manière positive et plusieurs avantages potentiels ont été identifiés.

From Preservice to Inservice

2018 ◽  
pp. 1765-1787
Author(s):  
Congcong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
English Language ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Inservice Teachers ◽  
Teaching English ◽  
Language Teacher ◽  
Teachers Perceptions

Wang (2012) suggested that preservice teachers perceived that their initial experiences as online language learners increased their linguistic, cultural and technological awareness, which would further benefit them when working with diverse students. However, that study was unclear about whether teachers perceived that they could transfer their awareness into teaching practice. Therefore, extending the pilot study, this follow-up study explored inservice teachers' perceptions of linguistic, cultural and technological awareness transfer in teaching English Language Learners by asking them to engage with an online language course and reflect on their experience. This study proposes a model for language teacher linguistic, cultural and technological awareness development and transfer, as well as discusses issues related to language teacher awareness transfer.

From Preservice to Inservice

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Congcong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
English Language ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Inservice Teachers ◽  
Language Teacher ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Follow Up Study

Wang (2012) suggested that preservice teachers perceived that their initial experiences as online language learners increased their linguistic, cultural and technological awareness, which would further benefit them when working with diverse students. However, that study was unclear about whether teachers perceived that they could transfer their awareness into teaching practice. Therefore, extending the pilot study, this follow-up study explored inservice teachers' perceptions of linguistic, cultural and technological awareness transfer in teaching English Language Learners by asking them to engage with an online language course and reflect on their experience. This study proposes a model for language teacher linguistic, cultural and technological awareness development and transfer, as well as discusses issues related to language teacher awareness transfer.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN TEACHING WRITING CAUSE EFFECT AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 1 GROGOL KEDIRI

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (`1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ratna Dewi Pamungkas ◽  
Agus Amroni
Keyword(s):  
Language Use ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Writing Achievement ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Content Organization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Text Content

This article aims to know the Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback in Teaching Writing Cause Effect at the Eleventh Grade of SMAN 1 Grogol Kediri. This research was quantitative experimental design, more specifically uses true experimental by posttest only controls class design to analyze the data. The data were analyzed and interpreted by means of SPSS 23.0 version. The study reveals that the effectiveness of written corrective feedback has a significant effect on students’ writing achievement in term of content of the text: content, organization, vocabulary, language use and mechanic. The result of students’ writing score from control class and experimental class demonstrated a significant difference. It is found that the experimental class outperformed the control class in writing achievement with t = 9.021, df = 66 and P = .000 and 95% Confidence Interval ranging from 9.138 to 14.332. From the sig. (2-tailed) we can see the P is lower than 5% (0.000 < 0.005). So, it can be concluded that the value is significant in 5% significant level. Thus, the significance different between the mean value of both class is found.

scholarly journals THE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS IN TEACHER WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE STUDENTS' WRITING

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dyah Fitri Mulati ◽  
Joko Nurkamto ◽  
Nur Arifah Drajati
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Practical Experience ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Writing Teachers ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Teachers Beliefs ◽  
Writing Strategy ◽  
Specific Teaching

Examining EFL writing teachers’ beliefs is becoming an essential study since teaching is no longer being noticed merely in a behaviour term but rather as thoughtful behaviour as teachers are active, thinking decision-maker. This study addresses the teachers’ beliefs in the specific teaching writing strategy that is commonly used by the teachers in Indonesia to assist students’ writing, teacher written corrective feedback. It was designed as a case study surveying two teachers from a secondary school in Lampung as its respondents. This current study aims at (1) exploring teachers’ beliefs in providing teacher written corrective feedback both in the explicitness and the amount of feedback, and (2) describing the factors that shape teachers’ beliefs in providing written corrective feedback. The data were collected by using mixed-type questionnaire and interview adapted from Lee (2009) consisting of three items related to the beliefs in written corrective feedback, followed by the factors that shape the beliefs teachers may hold on. The findings show some underlie different beliefs regarding the explicitness and amount of teacher written corrective feedback between the teachers. However, they agreed that academic background in the secondary school and college was counted as the contributed factor that shapes their beliefs in providing written corrective feedback on students’ writing. Further, teacher added practical experience when they are teaching writing as her additional factor.

scholarly journals Written Corrective Feedback: What Do Malaysian Learners Prefer And Why?

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5C) ◽  
pp. 1221-1225
Keyword(s):  
Language Learners ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Written Feedback ◽  
Esl Students ◽  
Writing Assignments ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Language Classes ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Direct Feedback ◽  
Malaysian Students

There has been an ongoing debate about the value of providing corrective feedback in writing assignments in English as a foreign/second language classes. Despite the fact, corrective feedback in writing has been analyzed from various perspectives, learners’ expectations regarding feedback given by language instructors are still to be considered. This paper investigates the types of written feedback preferred by the Malaysian students. This study investigated how language learners perceive the usefulness of different types and amounts of written corrective feedback, and also the reasons they have for their preferences. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected from 103 ESL students by means of computer generated written questionnaires. The results showed that Malaysian learners react in favor of direct feedback to their written work, and yet they show little tolerance for simply marking the error without explanation. Moreover, considerable number of the respondents favored indirect corrective feedback with a clue. Possible explanations for the results were given with reference to the theoretical constructs of SLA.

Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study

2020 ◽  
pp. 136216882091235
Author(s):  
YouJin Kim ◽  
Bumyong Choi ◽  
Hyunae Yun ◽  
Binna Kim ◽  
Sujeong Choi
Keyword(s):  
Task Performance ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Collaborative Writing ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Task Repetition ◽  
Writing Fluency ◽  
Repetition Effects ◽  
Foreign Language Learners ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback

Recently, there has been a shift in the perception of tasks. Tasks are no longer viewed as ‘one-off’ activities, and the importance of studying the role of task repetition has been increasingly addressed (Bygate, 2018). However, the way task repetition effects are mediated by other instructional conditions such as corrective feedback has not been widely researched. The current study examined the effects of task repetition and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback (WCF) during collaborative writing on the quality of students’ written task performance and the learning of Korean grammar. Fifty-four Korean as a foreign language learners completed a pretest, two collaborative writing tasks, and two posttests over 10 weeks. Their task performance was analysed in terms of complexity, accuracy and fluency, and the pretest and posttest results were scored for both suppliance and accuracy of the production of target grammatical features. The findings showed that task repetition improved writing fluency, and while synchronous WCF negatively impacted fluency during collaborative writing, it facilitated accuracy in students’ writing. In terms of the learning of target grammatical features, no significant benefit of synchronous WCF was found.

Investigating teachers’ written corrective feedback practices in a Saudi EFL context

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Alshahrani ◽  
Neomy Storch
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Policy Recommendations ◽  
Efl Context ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Indirect Feedback ◽  
Direct Feedback

In recent years there have been a growing number of studies on written corrective feedback (WCF), particularly in terms of the efficacy of different types of WCF. However, few of these studies have investigated what shapes teachers’ WCF practices and how they align with students’ preferences. This study, conducted with staff and students in a large Saudi university that has strict guidelines on WCF provision, examined the teachers’ WCF practices in relation to the institutional guidelines, their own beliefs about the most effective forms of WCF as well as their students’ preferences. Data collected included the feedback given by three teachers on their students’ writing (15 students per teacher), follow-up interviews with the teachers, and questionnaires completed by the students. The study found that although the teachers followed the strict guidelines and provided comprehensive indirect feedback, these practices did not always accord with their beliefs. Most of the WCF given tended to be on mechanics, and the teachers seemed unaware that this was the main focus of their feedback. They were also largely unaware that their students preferred direct feedback and mainly on grammar. We conclude our paper with some policy recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document