scholarly journals Physical Restraint in Psychiatric Care: Soon to Fall Out of Use?

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-473
Author(s):  
Gianluca Montanari Vergallo ◽  
◽  
Matteo Gulino ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataliya Konstantinovna Rzhevskaya ◽  
Viktor Aleksandrovich Ruzhenkov ◽  
Nazim Yasharovich Orudzhev ◽  
Oleg Yurievich Shiryaev

In accordance with international principles for the protection of persons with mental disorders, physical restraint and isolation of the patient are used only in compliance with the approved regulations of the psychiatric hospital in cases where this is the only available way to prevent direct harm to the patient or other persons. Nevertheless, in real practice, there are often cases of applying measures of physical restraint, feeding and administering drugs against the will of the patient. The attitude of psychiatrists of psychiatric hospitals of the Belgorod, Volgograd and Voronezh Regions to coercion and violence in the provision of psychiatric care was studied. It was found that the majority of psychiatrists (91.6%) consider coercion of people with mental disorders to be justified, and 60% delegate this right to nurses. More than 90% of psychiatrists consider justified the use of physical restraint to a patient admitted to hospital treatment on a voluntary basis, in the case of psychomotor agitation with heteroagression, and 20% allow their personal participation in its implementation. Almost 47% of psychiatrists allow other patients to be involved in a forced injection to a patient who refuses therapy. The majority of psychiatrists (71%) consider it common practice to force patients with mental disorders who tend to “lie in bed” to clean the ward, department, hospital grounds, regarding it as “rehabilitation” and “labor therapy”. To prevent the use of violence and coercion in a psychiatric hospital, a transition from the paternalistic to the contractual model of psychiatric care is necessary. It is important to develop standards for the provision of psychiatric care in involuntary hospitalization, taking into account the compliance, and also to increase the legal competence of psychiatrists.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guru S. Gowda ◽  
Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar ◽  
Sujoy Ray ◽  
Soumitra Das ◽  
Raveesh Bevinahalli Nanjegowda ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: Coercion and restraint practices in psychiatric care are common phenomena and often controversial and debatable ethical issue. Caregivers’ attitude and perspective on coercion and restraint practices on psychiatric inpatients have received relatively less research attention till date. Aims: Caregivers’ attitude and perspective on coercion and restraint practices on psychiatric inpatients. Methodology: This is a hospital-based, a descriptive, cross-sectional study. A total of 200 (n = 200) consecutive patient and their caregivers were chosen between June 2013 and September 2014 through computer-generated random numbers sampling technique. We used a semi-structured interview questionnaire to capture caregivers’ attitude and perspective on coercion and restraint practices. Sociodemographic and coercion variable were analyzed using descriptive statistics. McNemar test was used to assess discrete variables. Results: The mean age was 43.8 (±14.9) years. About 67.5% of the caregivers were family members, 60.5% of them were male and 69.5% were from low-socioeconomic status. Caregivers used multiple methods were used to bring patients into the hospital. Threat (52.5%) was the most common method of coercion followed by persuasion (48.5%). Caregivers felt necessary and acceptable to use chemical restraint (82.5%), followed by physical restraint (71%) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (56.5%) during acute and emergency psychiatric care to control imminent risk behavior of patients. Conclusion: Threat, persuasion and physical restraint were the common methods to bring patients to bring acutely disturbed patients to mental health care. Most patients caregivers felt the use of chemical restraint, physical restraint and ECT as necessary for acute and emergency care in patients with mental illness.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
ROBERT T. LONDON
Keyword(s):  

Pflege ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Hannes Mayerl ◽  
Tanja Trummer ◽  
Erwin Stolz ◽  
Éva Rásky ◽  
Wolfgang Freidl

Abstract. Background: Given that nursing staff play a critical role in the decision regarding use of physical restraints, research has examined nursing professionals’ attitudes toward this practice. Aim: Since nursing professionals’ views on physical restraint use have not yet been examined in Austria to date, we aimed to explore nursing professionals’ attitudes concerning use of physical restraints in nursing homes of Styria (Austria). Method: Data were collected from a convenience sample of nursing professionals (N = 355) within 19 Styrian nursing homes, based on a cross-sectional study design. Attitudes toward the practice of restraint use were assessed by means of the Maastricht Attitude Questionnaire in the German version. Results: The overall results showed rather positive attitudes toward the use of physical restraints, yet the findings regarding the sub-dimensions of the questionnaire were mixed. Although nursing professionals tended to deny “good reasons” for using physical restraints, they evaluated the consequences of physical restraint use rather positive and considered restraint use as an appropriate health care practice. Nursing professionals’ views regarding the consequences of using specific physical restraints further showed that belts were considered as the most restricting and discomforting devices. Conclusions: Overall, Austrian nursing professionals seemed to hold more positive attitudes toward the use of physical restraints than counterparts in other Western European countries. Future nationwide large-scale surveys will be needed to confirm our findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document