scholarly journals Risk factors for disc height loss in conservatively treated symptomatic lumbar disc herniation in elderly patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Min Seo ◽  
Yongjae Cho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Height Loss

scholarly journals Comparative Study between Full-Endoscopic Discectomy and Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 710
Author(s):  
Muneyoshi Fujita ◽  
Tomoaki Kitagawa ◽  
Masahiro Hirahata ◽  
Takahiro Inui ◽  
Hirotaka Kawano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Height Loss ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Microendoscopic Discectomy

Background and objectives: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common disease in the meridian of life. Although surgical discectomy is commonly used to treat LDH, there are several different strategies. We compared the outcomes of uniportal full-endoscopic discectomy (FED) with those of microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in treating LDH. Materials and Methods: FED was performed using a 4.1-mm working channel endoscope, and MED was performed using a 16-mm diameter tubular retractor and endoscope. Data of patients with LDH treated with FED (n = 39) or MED (n = 27) by the single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Patient background information and operative data were collected. Pre- and postoperative low back and leg pain were evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score. Pre- and postoperative disc height index (DHI) values were calculated from plain radiographs, and the disc height loss was evaluated using the ratio (DHI ratio); Results: The median (interquartile range (IQR) Q25–75) operation times for FED and MED were 42 (33–61) and 43 (33–50) minutes, respectively. The median (IQR Q25–75) pre- and postoperative NRS scores for low back pain were 5 (2–7) and 1 (0–4), respectively, for FED and 6 (3–8) and 1 (0–2), respectively, for MED. The median (IQR Q25–75) pre- and postoperative NRS scores for leg pain were 7 (5–8) and 0 (0–2), respectively, for FED and 6 (5–8) and 0 (0–2), respectively, for MED. These data were not different between the FED and MED groups. The median (IQR Q25–75) DHI ratios of FED and MED were 0.94 (0.89–1.03) and 0.90 (0.79–0.95), respectively. The DHI ratio was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the FED group than in the MED group, and there was less blood loss; Conclusions: The pain-relieving effect of FED in treating LDH was almost identical to that of MED. However, FED was superior to MED in preventing disc height loss, which is one of the indicators of postoperative disc degeneration.

Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 963-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Ho Shin ◽  
Kyu-Jung Cho ◽  
Young-Tae Kim ◽  
Myung-Hoon Park
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

scholarly journals Postoperative Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors for Poor Outcome of Foraminal and Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniation

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Sik Bae ◽  
Kyung Hee Kang ◽  
Jeong Hyun Park ◽  
Jae Hyeon Lim ◽  
Il Tae Jang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Poor Outcome

scholarly journals Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 592-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Takenaka ◽  
Kosuke Tateishi ◽  
Noboru Hosono ◽  
Yoshihiro Mukai ◽  
Takeshi Fuji
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Acute Sciatica

OBJECT In this study, the authors aimed to identify specific risk factors for postdecompression lumbar disc herniation (PDLDH) in patients who have not undergone discectomy and/or fusion. METHODS Between 2007 and 2012, 493 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent bilateral partial laminectomy without discectomy and/or fusion in a single hospital. Eighteen patients (herniation group [H group]: 15 men, 3 women; mean age 65.1 years) developed acute sciatica as a result of PDLDH within 2 years after surgery. Ninety patients who did not develop postoperative acute sciatica were selected as a control group (C group: 75 men, 15 women; mean age 65.4 years). Patients in the C group were age and sex matched with those in the H group. The patients in the groups were also matched for decompression level, number of decompression levels, and surgery date. The radiographic variables measured included percentage of slippage, intervertebral angle, range of motion, lumbar lordosis, disc height, facet angle, extent of facet removal, facet degeneration, disc degeneration, and vertebral endplate degeneration. The threshold for PDLDH risk factors was evaluated using a continuous numerical variable and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the curve was used to determine the diagnostic performance, and values greater than 0.75 were considered to represent good performance. RESULTS Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative retrolisthesis during extension was the sole significant independent risk factor for PDLDH. The area under the curve for preoperative retrolisthesis during extension was 0.849; the cutoff value was estimated to be a retrolisthesis of 7.2% during extension. CONCLUSIONS The authors observed that bilateral partial laminectomy, performed along with the removal of the posterior support ligament, may not be suitable for lumbar spinal stenosis patients with preoperative retrolisthesis greater than 7.2% during extension.

scholarly journals Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Shepard ◽  
Woojin Cho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Invasive Techniques ◽  
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Study Design: Narrative review. Objectives: To identify the risk factors and surgical management for recurrent lumbar disc herniation using a systematic review of available evidence. Methods: We conducted a review of PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, and Cochrane Library databases using search terms identifying recurrent lumbar disc herniation and risk factors or surgical management. Abstracts of all identified articles were reviewed. Detailed information from articles with levels I to IV evidence was extracted and synthesized. Results: There is intermediate levels III to IV evidence detailing perioperative risk factors and the optimal surgical technique for recurrent lumbar disc herniations. Conclusions: Multiple risk factors including smoking, diabetes mellitus, obesity, intraoperative technique, and biomechanical factors may contribute to the development of recurrent disc disease. There is widespread variation regarding optimal surgical management for recurrent herniation, which often include revision discectomies with or without fusion via open and minimally invasive techniques.

Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in elderly patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 85-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1146-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Fujii ◽  
T. Henmi ◽  
Y. Kanematsu ◽  
T. Mishiro ◽  
T. Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document