scholarly journals Spatial correlation of radar and gauge precipitation data in high temporal resolution

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brommundt ◽  
A. Bárdossy
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Spatial Structure ◽  
Spatial Correlation ◽  
Cross Correlation ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Cross Correlations

Abstract. A multi-sites precipitation time series generator for engineering designs is currently being developed. The objective is to generate several time series' simultaneously with correct inter-station relationships. Therefore, a model to estimate correlation between stations for arbitrary points in a project area is needed, using rain gauge data as well as radar data. Two methods are applied to compare the spatial behaviour of precipitation in both the rain gauge data and the radar data. The first approach is to calculate precipitation intensities from radar reflectivity and use it as gauge data. The results show that the spatial structure in both data sets is similar, but cross correlation varies too much to use radar derived spatial correlation to describe gauge inter-station relationship. Thus, a second approach was tested to account for the differences in the spatial correlation associated to the distribution. Using the indicator time series, cross correlations for different quantiles were calculated from both the rain gauge and radar data. This approach shows that cross correlation varies depending on the chosen quantile. In the lower quantiles, the correlation is very similar in rain gauge and radar data, hence a transfer is possible. This insight is useful to derive cross correlations of rain gauges from radar images. Correlation data for rain gauges thus obtained contains all the information about heterogeneity and anisotropy of the spatial structure of rainfall, which is in the radar data.

scholarly journals Improving Satellite-Based Subhourly Surface Rain Estimates Using Vertical Rain Profile Information

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1015-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Utsumi ◽  
Hyungjun Kim ◽  
F. Joseph Turk ◽  
Ziad. S. Haddad
Keyword(s):  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Surface Rain Rate ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Time Lagged ◽  
Rain Rates

Abstract Quantifying time-averaged rain rate, or rain accumulation, on subhourly time scales is essential for various application studies requiring rain estimates. This study proposes a novel idea to estimate subhourly time-averaged surface rain rate based on the instantaneous vertical rain profile observed from low-Earth-orbiting satellites. Instantaneous rain estimates from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Radar (PR) are compared with 1-min surface rain gauges in North America and Kwajalein atoll for the warm seasons of 2005–14. Time-lagged correlation analysis between PR rain rates at various height levels and surface rain gauge data shows that the peak of the correlations tends to be delayed for PR rain at higher levels up to around 6-km altitude. PR estimates for low to middle height levels have better correlations with time-delayed surface gauge data than the PR’s estimated surface rain rate product. This implies that rain estimates for lower to middle heights may have skill to estimate the eventual surface rain rate that occurs 1–30 min later. Therefore, in this study, the vertical profiles of TRMM PR instantaneous rain estimates are averaged between the surface and various heights above the surface to represent time-averaged surface rain rate. It was shown that vertically averaged PR estimates up to middle heights (~4.5 km) exhibit better skill, compared to the PR estimated instantaneous surface rain product, to represent subhourly (~30 min) time-averaged surface rain rate. These findings highlight the merit of additional consideration of vertical rain profiles, not only instantaneous surface rain rate, to improve subhourly surface estimates of satellite-based rain products.

scholarly journals Multisensor Precipitation Reanalysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 666-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Nelson ◽  
D-J. Seo ◽  
Dongsoo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Data Quality Control ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Validation Experiments

Abstract Temporally consistent high-quality, high-resolution multisensor precipitation reanalysis (MPR) products are needed for a wide range of quantitative climatological and hydroclimatological applications. Therefore, the authors have reengineered the multisensor precipitation estimator (MPE) algorithms of the NWS into the MPR package. Owing to the retrospective nature of the analysis, MPR allows for the utilization of additional rain gauge data, more rigorous automatic quality control, and post factum correction of radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) and optimization of key parameters in multisensor estimation. To evaluate and demonstrate the value of MPR, the authors designed and carried out a set of cross-validation experiments in the pilot domain of North Carolina and South Carolina. The rain gauge data are from the reprocessed Hydrometeorological Automated Data System (HADS) and the daily Cooperative Observer Program (COOP). The radar QPE data are the operationally produced Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler digital precipitation array (DPA) products. To screen out bad rain gauge data, quality control steps were taken that use rain gauge and radar data. The resulting MPR products are compared with the stage IV product on a daily scale at the withheld COOP gauge locations. This paper describes the data, the MPR procedure, and the validation experiments, and it summarizes the findings.

scholarly journals Geostatistical Merging of a Single-Polarized X-Band Weather Radar and a Sparse Rain Gauge Network over an Urban Catchment

Atmosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Seck ◽  
Joël Van Baelen
Keyword(s):  
Mean Field ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
X Band ◽  
Distance Weighting ◽  
Field Bias ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Inverse Distance

Optimal Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) of rainfall is crucial to the accuracy of hydrological models, especially over urban catchments. Small-to-medium size towns are often equipped with sparse rain gauge networks that struggle to capture the variability in rainfall over high spatiotemporal resolutions. X-band Local Area Weather Radars (LAWRs) provide a cost-effective solution to meet this challenge. The Clermont Auvergne metropolis monitors precipitation through a network of 13 rain gauges with a temporal resolution of 5 min. 5 additional rain gauges with a 6-minute temporal resolution are available in the region, and are operated by the national weather service Météo-France. The LaMP (Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique) laboratory’s X-band single-polarized weather radar monitors precipitation as well in the region. In this study, three geostatistical interpolation techniques—Ordinary kriging (OK), which was applied to rain gauge data with a variogram inferred from radar data, conditional merging (CM), and kriging with an external drift (KED)—are evaluated and compared through cross-validation. The performance of the inverse distance weighting interpolation technique (IDW), which was applied to rain gauge data only, was investigated as well, in order to evaluate the effect of incorporating radar data on the QPE’s quality. The dataset is comprised of rainfall events that occurred during the seasons of summer 2013 and winter 2015, and is exploited at three temporal resolutions: 5, 30, and 60 min. The investigation of the interpolation techniques performances is carried out for both seasons and for the three temporal resolutions using raw radar data, radar data corrected from attenuation, and the mean field bias, successively. The superiority of the geostatistical techniques compared to the inverse distance weighting method was verified with an average relative improvement of 54% and 31% in terms of bias reduction for kriging with an external drift and conditional merging, respectively (cross-validation). KED and OK performed similarly well, while CM lagged behind in terms of point measurement QPE accuracy, but was the best method in terms of preserving the observations’ variance. The correction schemes had mixed effects on the multivariate geostatistical methods. Indeed, while the attenuation correction improved KED across the board, the mean field bias correction effects were marginal. Both radar data correction schemes resulted in a decrease of the ability of CM to preserve the observations variance, while slightly improving its point measurement QPE accuracy.

scholarly journals WHU-SGCC: A novel approach for blending daily satellite (CHIRP) and precipitation observations over Jinsha River Basin

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaoyun Shen ◽  
Nengcheng Chen ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Zeqiang Chen
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Jinsha River ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Hydrological Applications

Abstract. Accurate and consistent satellite-based precipitation estimates blended with rain gauge data are important for regional precipitation monitoring and hydrological applications, especially in regions with limited rain gauges. However, existing fusion precipitation estimates often have large uncertainties over mountainous areas with complex topography and sparse rain gauges, and the existing data blending algorithms are very bad at removing the day-by-day random errors. Therefore, the development of effective methods for high-accuracy precipitation estimates over complex terrain and on a daily scale is of vital importance for mountainous hydrological applications. This study aims to offer a novel approach for blending daily precipitation gauge data, gridded precipitation data and the Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation (CHIRP, daily, 0.05°) satellite-derived precipitation estimates over the Jinsha River Basin for the period of June–July–August in 2016. This method is named the Wuhan University Satellite and Gauge precipitation Collaborated Correction (WHU-SGCC). The results show that the WHU-SGCC method is effective in precipitation bias adjustments from point to surface, which is evaluated by categorical indices. Moreover, the accuracy of the spatial distribution of the precipitation estimates derived from the WHU-SGCC method is related to the complexity of the topography. The validation also verifies that the proposed approach is effective in the detection of precipitation events that are less than 20 mm. This study indicates that the WHU-SGCC approach is a promising tool to monitor monsoon precipitation over Jinsha River Basin, the complicated mountainous terrain with sparse rain gauge data, considering the spatial correlation and the historical precipitation characteristics. The daily precipitation estimations at 0.05° resolution over Jinsha River Basin in summer 2016, derived from WHU-SGCC are available at the PANGAEA Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science portal (https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.896615).

scholarly journals Point-Based Rainfall Intensity Information System in Mt. Merapi Area by X-Band Radar

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosa Sandy Putra ◽  
Banata Wachid Ridwan ◽  
Kazuki Yamanoi ◽  
Makoto Shimomura ◽  
Sulistiyani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Satellite Data ◽  
Early Warning Systems ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Data Grid ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
X Band ◽  
Gauge Data

An X-band radar was installed in 2014 at Merapi Museum, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, to monitor pyroclastic and rainfall events around Mt. Merapi. This research aims to perform a reliability analysis of the point extracted rainfall data from the aforementioned newly installed radar to improve the performance of the warning system in the future. The radar data was compared with the monitored rain gauge data from Balai Sabo and the IMERG satellite data from NASA and JAXA (The Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM), which had not been done before. All of the rainfall data was compared on an hourly interval. The comparisons were conducted based on 11 locations that correspond to the ground rainfall measurement stations. The locations of the rain gauges are spread around Mt. Merapi area. The point rainfall information was extracted from the radar data grid and the satellite data grid, which were compared with the rain gauge data. The data were then calibrated and adjusted up to the optimum state. Based on January 2017–March 2018 data, it was obtained that the optimum state has a NSF value of 0.41 and R2value of 0.56. As a result, it was determined that the radar can capture around 79% of the hourly rainfall occurrence around Mt. Merapi area during the chosen calibration period, in comparison with the rain gauge data. The radar was also able to capture nearby 40–50% of the heavy rainfall events that pose risks of lahar. In contrast, the radar data performance in detecting drizzling and light rain types were quite precise (55% of cases), although the satellite data could detect slightly better (60% of cases). These results indicate that the radar sensitivity in detecting the extreme rainfall events must receive higher priority in future developments, especially for applications to the existing Mt. Merapi lahar early warning systems.

scholarly journals A Rainfall Data Intercomparison Dataset of RADKLIM, RADOLAN, and Rain Gauge Data for Germany

Data ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kreklow ◽  
Tetzlaff ◽  
Kuhnt ◽  
Burkhard
Keyword(s):  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Quality Checks ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Rainfall Statistics

Quantitative precipitation estimates (QPE) derived from weather radars provide spatially and temporally highly resolved rainfall data. However, they are also subject to systematic and random bias and various potential uncertainties and therefore require thorough quality checks before usage. The dataset described in this paper is a collection of precipitation statistics calculated from the hourly nationwide German RADKLIM and RADOLAN QPEs provided by the German Weather Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)), which were combined with rainfall statistics derived from rain gauge data for intercomparison. Moreover, additional information on parameters that can potentially influence radar data quality, such as the height above sea level, information on wind energy plants and the distance to the next radar station, were included in the dataset. The resulting two point shapefiles are readable with all common GIS and constitutes a spatially highly resolved rainfall statistics geodataset for the period 2006 to 2017, which can be used for statistical rainfall analyses or for the derivation of model inputs. Furthermore, the publication of this data collection has the potential to benefit other users who intend to use precipitation data for any purpose in Germany and to identify the rainfall dataset that is best suited for their application by a straightforward comparison of three rainfall datasets without any tedious data processing and georeferencing.

scholarly journals Rainfall Regime of a Mountainous Mediterranean Region: Statistical Analysis at Short Time Steps

2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Molinié ◽  
Davide Ceresetti ◽  
Sandrine Anquetin ◽  
Jean Dominique Creutin ◽  
Brice Boudevillain
Keyword(s):  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Large River ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Heavy Rainfall Event ◽  
Rainfall Regime ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
The Difference

AbstractThis paper presents an analysis of the rainfall regime of a Mediterranean mountainous region of southeastern France. The rainfall regime is studied on temporal scales from hourly to yearly using daily and hourly rain gauge data of 43 and 16 years, respectively. The domain is 200 × 200 km2 with spatial resolution of hourly and daily rain gauges of about 8 and 5 km, respectively. On average, yearly rainfall increases from about 0.5 m yr−1 in the large river plain close to the Mediterranean Sea to up to 2 m yr−1 over the surrounding mountain ridges. The seasonal distribution is also uneven: one-third of the cumulative rainfall occurs during the autumn season and one-fourth during the spring. At finer time scales, rainfall is studied in terms of rain–no-rain intermittency and nonzero intensity. The monthly intermittency (proportion of dry days per month) and the daily intermittency (proportion of dry hours per day) is fairly well correlated with the relief. The higher the rain gauges are, the lower the monthly and daily intermittencies are. The hourly and daily rainfall intensities are analyzed in terms of seasonal variability, diurnal cycle, and spatial pattern. The difference between regular and heavy-rainfall event is depicted by using both central parameters and maximum values of intensity distributions. The relationship between rain gauge altitudes and rainfall intensity is grossly inverted relative to intermittency and is also far more complex. The spatial and temporal rainfall patterns depicted from rain gauge data are discussed in the light of known meteorological processes affecting the study region.

Experimental 4D-Var Assimilation of SYNOP Rain Gauge Data at ECMWF

2013 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 1527-1544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Surface Precipitation ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Key Aspects

Abstract Four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4D-Var) experiments with 6-hourly rain gauge accumulations observed at synoptic stations (SYNOP) around the globe have been run over several months, both at high resolution in an ECMWF operations-like framework and at lower resolution with the reference observational coverage reduced to surface pressure data only, as would be expected in early twentieth-century periods. The key aspects of the technical implementation of rain gauge data assimilation in 4D-Var are described, which include the specification of observation errors, bias correction procedures, screening, and quality control. Results from experiments indicate that the positive impact of rain gauges on forecast scores remains limited in the operations-like context because of their competition with all other observations already available. In contrast, when only synoptic station surface pressure observations are assimilated in the data-poor control experiment, the additional assimilation of rain gauge measurements substantially improves not only surface precipitation scores, but also analysis and forecast scores of temperature, geopotential, wind, and humidity at most atmospheric levels and for forecast ranges up to 10 days. The verification against Meteosat infrared imagery also shows a slight improvement in the spatial distribution of clouds. This suggests that assimilating rain gauge data available during data-sparse periods of the past might help to improve the quality of future reanalyses and subsequent forecasts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document