scholarly journals A new method for solving the MHD equations in the magnetosheath

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Nabert ◽  
K.-H. Glassmeier ◽  
F. Plaschke

Abstract. We present a new analytical method to derive steady-state magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) solutions of the magnetosheath in different levels of approximation. With this method, we calculate the magnetosheath's density, velocity, and magnetic field distribution as well as its geometry. Thereby, the solution depends on the geomagnetic dipole moment and solar wind conditions only. To simplify the representation, we restrict our model to northward IMF with the solar wind flow along the stagnation streamline. The sheath's geometry, with its boundaries, bow shock and magnetopause, is determined self-consistently. Our model is stationary and time relaxation has not to be considered as in global MHD simulations. Our method uses series expansion to transfer the MHD equations into a new set of ordinary differential equations. The number of equations is related to the level of approximation considered including different physical processes. These equations can be solved numerically; however, an analytical approach for the lowest-order approximation is also presented. This yields explicit expressions, not only for the flow and field variations but also for the magnetosheath thickness, depending on the solar wind parameters. Results are compared to THEMIS data and offer a detailed explanation of, e.g., the pile-up process and the corresponding plasma depletion layer, the bow shock and magnetopause geometry, the magnetosheath thickness, and the flow deceleration.

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-486
Author(s):  
L. S. Rakhmanova ◽  
M. O. Riazantseva ◽  
G. N. Zastenker ◽  
Yu. I. Yermolaev ◽  
I. G. Lodkina

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1979-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lockwood ◽  
L. Barnard ◽  
H. Nevanlinna ◽  
M. J. Owens ◽  
R. G. Harrison ◽  
...  

Abstract. We present a new reconstruction of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF, B) for 1846–2012 with a full analysis of errors, based on the homogeneously constructed IDV(1d) composite of geomagnetic activity presented in Part 1 (Lockwood et al., 2013a). Analysis of the dependence of the commonly used geomagnetic indices on solar wind parameters is presented which helps explain why annual means of interdiurnal range data, such as the new composite, depend only on the IMF with only a very weak influence of the solar wind flow speed. The best results are obtained using a polynomial (rather than a linear) fit of the form B = χ · (IDV(1d) − β)α with best-fit coefficients χ = 3.469, β = 1.393 nT, and α = 0.420. The results are contrasted with the reconstruction of the IMF since 1835 by Svalgaard and Cliver (2010).


2011 ◽  
Vol 116 (A7) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Went ◽  
G. B. Hospodarsky ◽  
A. Masters ◽  
K. C. Hansen ◽  
M. K. Dougherty

1988 ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
A. J. Coates ◽  
A. D. Johnstone ◽  
M. F. Thomsen ◽  
V. Formisano ◽  
E. Amata ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Charles F. Kennel

In this chapter, we try to infer from magnetohydrodynamic reasoning and observation how the magnetosphere might look and behave if the magnetopause were inactive. Since there probably never has been an occasion when both viscosity and reconnection were absent, all we can do is array observations of phenomena that do not depend on either mechanism for their existence. As a result, we end up focusing on how the magnetosphere arrives at a balance of pressure with the solar wind. How it responds to changes in its confining pressure will be the topic of the next chapter. All discussions of the magnetosphere start with the magnetopause, and, indeed, the first models of the magnetosphere were calculations of the shape of the magnetopause. Without reconnection and without viscosity, the magnetopause would be given by the Chapman-Ferraro model on the dayside and close due to the reexpansion of the finite-temperature solar wind on the nightside (Section 2.2). This magnetosphere has a teardrop shape. After the dependence upon the interplanetary field via the reconnection process is taken into account, the average position and shape of the dayside magnetopause is in general accord with the Chapman-Ferraro model (Section 2.3). Because the magnetopause is always in motion, the early estimates of its thickness were uncertain until the first twospacecraft observations were made (Section 2.4). The magnetopause current layer proved to be several ion Larmor radii thick, significantly thicker than the electron inertial length. Once the average position of the magnetopause is specified, the position of the bow shock can be calculated using methods first employed for hypersonic flow around blunt bodies, which are easily extended to a weak-field MHD regime. The measured average positions of the bow shock and magnetopause agree once variations in solar wind dynamic pressure are taken into account (Section 2.5). While weak-field MHD does a good job with the bow shock, it fails in the subsolar magnetosheath, where a plasma depletion layer forms just upstream of the magnetopause (Section 2.6). Full MHD theory suggests that as many as three shocks could be standing in the flow enclosing the magnetosphere, a fast bow shock, an intermediate shock, and a slow shock.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1067-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. MENDIS ◽  
M. HORÁNYI

AbstractThe Rosetta–Philae mission to comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko in 2014 will provide a unique opportunity to observe the variable nature of the interaction of a comet with the solar radiation and the solar wind, as the comet approaches the Sun. In this short paper we will focus on the varying global structure of the cometary plasma environment. Specifically we make predictions on the varying locations of the two basic transitions in the global, contaminated solar wind flow toward the comet: the outer bow shock and the ionopause.


1988 ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Johnstone ◽  
K. Glassmeier ◽  
M. Acuna ◽  
H. Borg ◽  
D. Bryant ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document