scholarly journals Partitioning CO<sub>2</sub> net ecosystem exchange fluxes on the microsite scale in the Lena River Delta, Siberia

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Eckhardt ◽  
Christian Knoblauch ◽  
Lars Kutzbach ◽  
Gillian Simpson ◽  
Evgeny Abakumov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Table ◽  
Net Ecosystem Exchange ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Arctic Tundra ◽  
High Water ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
River Delta ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Hydrological Conditions ◽  
Lena River Delta

Abstract. Arctic tundra ecosystems are currently facing rates of amplified climate change. This is critical as these ecosystems store significant amounts of carbon in their soils, which can be mineralized to CO2 and CH4 and released to the atmosphere. To understand how the CO2 net ecosystem exchange (NEE) fluxes will react to changing climatic conditions, it is necessary to understand the individual responses of the physiological processes contributing to CO2 NEE. Therefore, this study aimed: (i) to partition NEE fluxes at the soil-plant-atmosphere interface in an arctic tundra ecosystem; and (ii) to identify the main environmental drivers of these fluxes. Hereby, the NEE fluxes were partitioned into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) and further into autotrophic (RA) and heterotrophic respiration (RH). The study examined flux data collected during the growing season in 2015 using closed chamber measurements in a polygonal tundra landscape in the Lena River Delta, northeastern Siberia. The measured fluxes on the microscale (1 m–10 m) were used to model the NEE, GPP, Reco, RH, RA and net ecosystem production (NPP) over the growing season. Here, for the first time, the differing response of in situ measured RA and RH fluxes from permafrost-affected soils to hydrological conditions have been examined. It was shown that low RA fluxes are associated to a high water table, most likely due to the submersion of mosses, while an effect of water table fluctuations on RH fluxes was not observed. Furthermore, this work found the polygonal tundra in the Lena River Delta to be a sink for atmospheric CO2 during the growing season. Spatial heterogeneity was apparent with the net CO2 uptake at a wet, depressed polygon center being more than twice as high as that measured at a drier polygon rim. In addition to higher GPP fluxes, the differences in NEE between the two microsites were caused by lower Reco fluxes at the center compared to the rim. Here, the contrasting hydrological conditions caused the CO2 flux differences between the microsites, where high water levels lad to lower decomposition rates due to anoxic conditions.

scholarly journals Partitioning net ecosystem exchange of CO<sub>2</sub> on the pedon scale in the Lena River Delta, Siberia

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 1543-1562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Eckhardt ◽  
Christian Knoblauch ◽  
Lars Kutzbach ◽  
David Holl ◽  
Gillian Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growing Season ◽  
Arctic Tundra ◽  
River Delta ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Co2 Fluxes ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Hydrological Conditions ◽  
Tundra Ecosystem ◽  
Water Saturated ◽  
Lena River Delta

Abstract. Arctic tundra ecosystems are currently facing amplified rates of climate warming. Since these ecosystems store significant amounts of soil organic carbon, which can be mineralized to carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), rising temperatures may cause increasing greenhouse gas fluxes to the atmosphere. To understand how net the ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 will respond to changing climatic and environmental conditions, it is necessary to understand the individual responses of the processes contributing to NEE. Therefore, this study aimed to partition NEE at the soil–plant–atmosphere interface in an arctic tundra ecosystem and to identify the main environmental drivers of these fluxes. NEE was partitioned into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) and further into autotrophic (RA) and heterotrophic respiration (RH). The study examined CO2 flux data collected during the growing season in 2015 using closed-chamber measurements in a polygonal tundra landscape in the Lena River Delta, northeastern Siberia. To capture the influence of soil hydrology on CO2 fluxes, measurements were conducted at a water-saturated polygon center and a well-drained polygon rim. These chamber-measured fluxes were used to model NEE, GPP, Reco, RH, RA, and net primary production (NPP) at the pedon scale (1–10 m) and to determine cumulative growing season fluxes. Here, the response of in situ measured RA and RH fluxes from permafrost-affected soils of the polygonal tundra to hydrological conditions have been examined. Although changes in the water table depth at the polygon center sites did not affect CO2 fluxes from RH, rising water tables were linked to reduced CO2 fluxes from RA. Furthermore, this work found the polygonal tundra in the Lena River Delta to be a net sink for atmospheric CO2 during the growing season. The NEE at the wet, depressed polygon center was more than twice that at the drier polygon rim. These differences between the two sites were caused by higher GPP fluxes due to a higher vascular plant density and lower Reco fluxes due to oxygen limitation under water-saturated conditions at the polygon center in comparison to the rim. Hence, soil hydrological conditions were one of the key drivers for the different CO2 fluxes across this highly heterogeneous tundra landscape.

Spatiotemporal variability of methane emissions of tundra landscapes in the Lena River Delta, Siberia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Kutzbach ◽  
Norman Rößger ◽  
Tim Eckhardt ◽  
Christian Knoblauch ◽  
Torsten Sachs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variability ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Landscape Scale ◽  
River Delta ◽  
The Other ◽  
Permafrost Degradation ◽  
River Terrace ◽  
Lena River ◽  
River Terraces ◽  
Lena River Delta

&lt;p&gt;Increased methane (CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;) release from a warming Arctic is expected to be a major feedback on the global climate. However, due to the complex effects of climate change on arctic geoecosystems, projections of future CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions are highly uncertain. CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions from complex tundra landscapes will be controlled not only by direct climatic effects on production, oxidation and transport of CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; but, importantly, also by geomorphology and hydrology changes caused by gradual or abrupt permafrost degradation. Therefore, improving our understanding of both the temporal dynamics and the spatial heterogeneity of CH4 fluxes on multiple scales is still necessary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here, we present pedon- and landscape-scale CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; flux measurements at two widespread tundra landscapes (active floodplains and late-holocene river terraces) of the Lena River Delta in the Siberian Arctic (72.4&amp;#176; N, 126.5&amp;#176; E). The dominating scales of spatial variability of soil, vegetation and CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes differ between the two landscapes of different geological development stage. The active floodplains are characterized by sandy beaches and ridges, and backswamp depressions, forming a mesorelief with height differences of several meters on horizontal scales of 10-1000 m. On the other hand, the river terraces are characterized by the formation of ice-wedge polygons, which lead to a regular microrelief with height differences of several decimeters on horizontal scales of 1 to 10 meters. CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes were investigated on the landscape scale with the eddy covariance method (15 campaigns during 2002-2018 at the river terrace, 2 campaigns 2014-2015 at the floodplain) and on the pedon scale with chamber methods (campaigns at different sites in 2002, 2006, 2013, 2014, 2015).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Average growing season (June-September) CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; flux for the floodplain was 166 &amp;#177; 4 mmol m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt;=2) and for the river terrace 100 &amp;#177; 25 mmol m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt;=15). There was pronounced spatial variability of CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes within both tundra landscapes types. On the river terrace, growing season CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; flux was only 20-40 mmol m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; at elevated polygon rims and polygon high centers, respectively, and up to 300 mmol m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; at polygon low centers. On the floodplain, CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; flux was as low as 5 mmol m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; at sandy ridges and above 400 mmol m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; in backswamp depressions. Mean growing season CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes at the river terrace were positively linearly correlated (&lt;em&gt;r&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.9, &lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt;=15) to growing-degree-days (base temperature of 5 &amp;#176;C). Our findings suggest that a warmer climate stimulates the production of CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;, which is directly reflected in increased CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions. On the other hand, warming effects on CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; oxidation appear limited because transport processes that bypass the soil oxidation zone, i.e. plant-mediated transport and ebullition, dominate CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emission from wet tundra landscapes. However, since CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions strongly vary with (micro-)topographical situation within tundra landscapes, the changes of geomorphology and hydrology due to permafrost degradation will probably be the dominating driver of future CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions from arctic tundra landscapes.&lt;/p&gt;

Short-term climate and vegetation dynamics in Lena River Delta (northern Yakutia, Eastern Siberia) during early Eocene

Palaeoworld ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olesya V. Bondarenko ◽  
Nadezhda I. Blokhina ◽  
Tatiyana A. Evstigneeva ◽  
Torsten Utescher
Keyword(s):  
Vegetation Dynamics ◽  
River Delta ◽  
Early Eocene ◽  
Eastern Siberia ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Lena River Delta

The Rock Magnetic Portrait of the Devonian Section of Stolb Island (Lena River Delta)

2021 ◽  
Vol 501 (1) ◽  
pp. 906-911
Author(s):  
D. V. Metelkin ◽  
A. I. Chernova ◽  
V. A. Vernikovsky ◽  
N. E. Mikhaltsov ◽  
V. V. Abashev
Keyword(s):  
River Delta ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Lena River Delta

scholarly journals Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry for Surface Deformation Monitoring in Low-Land Permafrost Areas

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tazio Strozzi ◽  
Sofia Antonova ◽  
Frank Günther ◽  
Eva Mätzler ◽  
Gonçalo Vieira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Surface Displacement ◽  
Deformation Monitoring ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
River Delta ◽  
Sar Interferometry ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Lena River Delta

Low-land permafrost areas are subject to intense freeze-thaw cycles and characterized by remarkable surface displacement. We used Sentinel-1 SAR interferometry (InSAR) in order to analyse the summer surface displacement over four spots in the Arctic and Antarctica since 2015. Choosing floodplain or outcrop areas as the reference for the InSAR relative deformation measurements, we found maximum subsidence of about 3 to 10 cm during the thawing season with generally high spatial variability. Sentinel-1 time-series of interferograms with 6–12 day time intervals highlight that subsidence is often occurring rather quickly within roughly one month in early summer. Intercomparison of summer subsidence from Sentinel-1 in 2017 with TerraSAR-X in 2013 over part of the Lena River Delta (Russia) shows a high spatial agreement between both SAR systems. A comparison with in-situ measurements for the summer of 2014 over the Lena River Delta indicates a pronounced downward movement of several centimetres in both cases but does not reveal a spatial correspondence between InSAR and local in-situ measurements. For the reconstruction of longer time-series of deformation, yearly Sentinel-1 interferograms from the end of the summer were considered. However, in order to infer an effective subsidence of the surface through melting of excess ice layers over multi-annual scales with Sentinel-1, a longer observation time period is necessary.

scholarly journals Lena River Delta formation during the Holocene

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 4085-4122 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bolshiyanov ◽  
A. Makarov ◽  
L. Savelieva
Keyword(s):  
Sea Water ◽  
River Delta ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Laptev Sea ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Sea Levels ◽  
Marine Terraces ◽  
Delta Formation ◽  
Carbon Reservoir ◽  
Lena River Delta

Abstract. The Lena River Delta, the largest delta of the Arctic Ocean, differs from other deltas because it consists mainly of organomineral sediments, commonly called peat, that contain a huge organic carbon reservoir. The analysis of Delta sediment radiocarbon ages showed that they could not have formed as peat during floodplain bogging, but accumulated when Laptev Sea water level was high and green mosses and sedges grew and were deposited on the surface of flooded marshes. The Lena River Delta formed as organomineral masses and layered sediments accumulated during transgressive phases when sea level rose. In regressive phases, the islands composed of these sediments and other, more ancient islands were eroded. Each new sea transgression led to further accumulation of layered sediments. As a result of alternating transgressive and regressive phases the first alluvial-marine terrace formed, consisting of geological bodies of different ages. Determining the formation age of different areas of the first terrace and other marine terraces on the coast allowed the periods of increasing (8–6 Ka, 4.5–4 Ka, 2.5–1.5 Ka, 0.4–0.2 Ka) and decreasing (5 Ka, 3 Ka, 0.5 Ka) Laptev Sea levels to be distinguished in the Lena Delta area.

scholarly journals Dynamics of the relief and sesmotectonic activity of the modern structures in the delta of the river lena

2019 ◽  
pp. 62-77
Author(s):  
L. P. Imaeva ◽  
G. S. Gusev ◽  
V. S. Imaev
Keyword(s):  
Transition Zone ◽  
North American ◽  
Active Faults ◽  
River Delta ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Main Element ◽  
Dominant Factor ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Lithospheric Plates ◽  
Lena River Delta

This paper presents seismogeodynamic analysis of modern structures located in the Lena river delta. These structures are key elements in the tectonic evolution of the shelf–continent transition zone in the Arctic segment of the boundary between the Eurasian and North American lithospheric plates. The geological structure of the Lena river delta is predetermined by the junction of the ancient Siberian platform and the Mesozoic Laptev Sea plate. These two large geoblocks of the crust, which differ in age, are separated by a fragment of the Kharaulakh segment of the Verkhoyansk fold system. In our study aimed to reveal regularities in seismotectonic destruction of the crust, we analyzed the geological and geophysical data on the crustal structure, active faults, modern structural plan, dynamic characteristics of the modern relief, and hydrological features characterizing of the flow redistribution in the Lena riverbed. A system of active faults identified in the Lena river delta shows a contrasting kinematic plan of the junction zone of the main geostructures. According to the analysis results, shear faulting is a dominant factor of impact on the morphologic features and seismogeodynamic activation of the modern structures. A regional right-lateral strike-slip fault of the sublatitudinal strike is traced as a major structural boundary that cuts the Lena river delta into several geodynamic segments. Seismotectonic destruction of the crust in the segments differs in types (transpression, transtension and compression). The above-mentioned fault is not only the main element of the kinematic plan of the newest structures in the Lena river delta – it controls the general structural pattern and seismotectonic parameters of active fault zones in the entire northern sector of the Verkhoyansk marginal suture. The seismogeodynamic analysis results obtained in our study provide a reliable basis for estimating potential seismic hazard of the modern structures in the Lena river delta and updating the available seismic zoning maps of the shelf–continent transition zone in the Arctic segment of the boundary between the Eurasian and North American lithospheric plates.

scholarly journals From sink to source: long-term (2002-2019) trends and anomalies in net ecosystem exchange of CO2 from a Scottish temperate peatland.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Hei-Laan Yeung ◽  
Carole Helfter ◽  
Neil Mullinger ◽  
Mhairi Coyle ◽  
Eiko Nemitz
Keyword(s):  
Water Table ◽  
Ecosystem Respiration ◽  
Net Ecosystem Exchange ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Water Table Depth ◽  
Sink Strength ◽  
Summer Drought ◽  
C Cycle ◽  
Dry Spell

&lt;p&gt;Peatlands North of 45&amp;#730; represent one of the largest terrestrial carbon (C) stores. They play an important role in the global C-cycle, and their ability to sequester carbon is controlled by multiple, often competing, factors including precipitation, temperature and phenology. Land-atmosphere exchange of carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) is dynamic, and exhibits marked seasonal and inter-annual variations which can effect the overall carbon sink strength in both the short- and long-term.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Due to increased incidences of climate anomalies in recent years, long-term datasets are essential to disambiguate natural variability in Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) from shorter-term fluctuations. This is particularly important at high latitudes (&gt;45&amp;#730;N) where the majority of global peatlands are found. With increasing pressure from stressors such as climate and land-use change, it has been predicted that with a ca. 3&lt;sup&gt;o&lt;/sup&gt;C global temperature rise by 2100, UK peatlands could become a net source of C.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;NEE of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; has been measured using the eddy-covariance (EC) method at Auchencorth Moss (55&amp;#176;47&amp;#8217;32 N, 3&amp;#176;14&amp;#8217;35 W, 267 m a.s.l.), a temperate, lowland, ombrotrophic peatland in central Scotland, continuously since 2002. Alongside EC data, we present a range of meteorological parameters measured at site including soil temperature, total solar and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), rainfall, and, since April 2007, half-hourly water table depth readings. The length of record and range of measurements make this dataset an important resource as one of the longest term records of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes from a temperate peatland.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although seasonal cycles of gross primary productivity (GPP) were highly variable between years, the site was a consistent CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; sink for the period 2002-2012. However, net annual losses of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; have been recorded on several occasions since 2013. Whilst NEE tends to be positively correlated with the length of growing season, anomalies in winter weather also explain some of the variability in CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; sink strength the following summer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Additionally, water table depth (WTD) plays a crucial role, affecting both GPP and ecosystem respiration (R&lt;sub&gt;eco&lt;/sub&gt;). Relatively dry summers in recent years have contributed to shifting the balance between R&lt;sub&gt;eco&lt;/sub&gt; and GPP: prolonged periods of low WTD were typically accompanied by an increase in R&lt;sub&gt;eco&lt;/sub&gt;, and a decrease in GPP, hence weakening the overall CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; sink strength. Extreme events such as drought periods and cold winter temperatures can have significant and complex effects on NEE, particularly when such meteorological anomalies co-occur. For example, a positive annual NEE occurred in 2003 when Europe experienced heatwave and summer drought. More recently, an unusually long spell of snow lasting until the end of March delayed the onset of the 2018 growing season by up to 1.5 months compared to previous years. This was followed by a prolonged dry spell in summer 2018, which weakened GPP, increased R&lt;sub&gt;eco&lt;/sub&gt; and led to a net annual loss of 47.4 ton CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-C km&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt;. It is clear that the role of Northern peatlands within the carbon cycle is being modified, driven by changes in climate at both local and global scales.&lt;/p&gt;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document