Past and future trends in large-scale atmospheric circulations over Europe: Assessment of the Jenkinson-Collison classification with reanalyses and CMIP6.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Herrera-Lormendez ◽  
Nikolaos Mastrantonas ◽  
Jörg Matschullat ◽  
Hervé Douville
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Extreme Weather Events ◽  
Dynamical Response ◽  
Weather Patterns

<p>Circulation classifications are a simple tool given their ability to portray aspects of day-to-day weather. As we start facing a dynamical response in general circulation patterns due to anthropogenic global warming, circulation changes can enhance or mitigate regional and local behaviour of extreme weather events.</p> <p>A weather type (WT) automatic classification, developed by Jenkinson-Collison (JC), is used to evaluate past and future changes in the seasonal frequencies of synoptic weather patterns over central and western Europe. A set of three reanalyses and four Global Climate Models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) are used, based on daily Sea Level Pressure (SLP) data.</p> <p>Discrepancies are found in the model outputs as they fall short of capturing interannual variabilities when compared to the reanalyses. Cyclonic and westerly circulations tend to be overestimated, whereas anticyclonics are underestimated.</p> <p>The projected frequencies, based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 5 (SSP5) experiment, suggest significant increasing trends for unclassified WT (characterized by weak pressure gradients) during their summer half-year persistency for the coming 21<sup>st</sup> century. Winter trends indicate a surge in westerlies and a reduction in the events of cyclonic circulations and easterly flows. The results of this study support evidence of emergent changes in the occurrence of major synoptic configurations over Europe.</p>

Past and future trends in large-scale atmospheric circulations over Europe: Assessment of the Jenkinson-Collison classification with reanalyses and CMIP6

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Herrera-Lormendez ◽  
Jörg Matschullat ◽  
Hervé Douville
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Extreme Weather Events ◽  
Dynamical Response ◽  
Weather Patterns

<p>Circulation classifications are a simple tool given their ability to portray aspects of day-to-day weather. As we start facing a dynamical response in general circulation patterns due to anthropogenic global warming, circulation changes can enhance or mitigate regional and local behaviour of extreme weather events.</p><p>An automatic weather type (WT) classification, developed by Jenkinson-Collison, is used to evaluate past and future changes in seasonal frequencies of synoptic weather patterns over central and western Europe. A set of three reanalyses and eight Global Climate Models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) are used, based on daily Sea Level Pressure (SLP) data.</p><p>Discrepancies are found in some of the model outputs as some fall short of capturing interannual variabilities when compared to reanalyses. Cyclonic and westerly circulations tend to be overestimated, whereas anticyclonic are underestimated.</p><p>Based on the historical data and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 5 (SSP5-8.5) scenario, the evaluated trends suggest more robust signals during the summer half-years given their lesser synoptic-scale variability. During this season, increasing frequencies are found for the WT characterized by weak pressure gradients, mostly at the expense of decreasing frequencies of the westerlies. Our findings indicate that the time of emergence of these signals only occurs towards the end of the 21<sup>st</sup> century, even in such a high-emission scenario.</p>

Simulation and Projection of Summer Convective Afternoon Rainfall Activities over Southeast Asia in CMIP6 Models

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-43
Author(s):  
Wan-Ru Huang ◽  
Ya-Hui Chang ◽  
Liping Deng ◽  
Pin-Yi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Sea Breeze ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Historical Simulation ◽  
Weather Patterns ◽  
The Future ◽  
Local Weather

AbstractConvective afternoon rainfall (CAR) events, which tend to generate a local rainfall typically in the afternoon, are among the most frequently observed local weather patterns over Southeast Asia during summer. Using satellite precipitation estimations as an observational base for model evaluation, this study examines the applicability of ten global climate models provided by the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) in simulating the CAR activities over Southeast Asia. Analyses also focus on exploring the characteristics and maintenance mechanisms of related projections of CAR activities in the future. Our analyses of the historical simulation indicate that EC-Earth3 and EC-Earth3-Veg are the two best models for simulating CAR activities (including amount, frequency, and intensity) over Southeast Asia. Analyses also demonstrate that EC-Earth3 and EC-Earth3-Veg outperform their earlier version (i.e., EC-Earth) in CMIP5 owing to the increase in its spatial resolution in CMIP6. For future projections, our examinations of the differences in CAR activities between the future (2071–2100, under the ssp858 run) and the present (1985–2014, under historical run) indicate that CAR events will become fewer but more intense over most land areas of Southeast Asia. Possible causes of the projected increase (decrease) in CAR intensity (frequency) are attributed to the projected increase (decrease) in the local atmospheric humidity (sea breeze convergence and daytime thermal instability). These findings provide insight into how the local weather/climate over Southeast Asia is likely to change under global warming.

scholarly journals The Climatology of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer in Contemporary Global Climate Models

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (22) ◽  
pp. 9151-9173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Davy
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Seasonal Cycles ◽  
Layer Depth

Here, we present the climatology of the planetary boundary layer depth in 18 contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) in simulations of the late-twentieth-century climate that were part of phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). We used a bulk Richardson methodology to establish the boundary layer depth from the 6-hourly synoptic-snapshot data available in the CMIP5 archives. We present an ensemble analysis of the climatological mean, diurnal cycle, and seasonal cycle of the boundary layer depth in these models and compare it to the climatologies from the ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis. Overall, we find that the CMIP5 models do a reasonably good job of reproducing the distribution of mean boundary layer depth, although the geographical patterns vary considerably between models. However, the models are biased toward weaker diurnal and seasonal cycles in the boundary layer depth and generally produce much deeper boundary layers at night and during the winter than are found in the reanalysis. These biases are likely to reduce the ability of these models to accurately represent other properties of the diurnal and seasonal cycles, and the sensitivity of these cycles to climate change.

scholarly journals Brief communication: Recent changes in summer Greenland blocking captured by none of the CMIP5 models

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 3287-3292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Hanna ◽  
Xavier Fettweis ◽  
Richard J. Hall
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cmip5 Models

Abstract. Recent studies note a significant increase in high-pressure blocking over the Greenland region (Greenland Blocking Index, GBI) in summer since the 1990s. Such a general circulation change, indicated by a negative trend in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index, is generally highlighted as a major driver of recent surface melt records observed on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS). Here we compare reanalysis-based GBI records with those from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) suite of global climate models over 1950–2100. We find that the recent summer GBI increase lies well outside the range of modelled past reconstructions and future GBI projections (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). The models consistently project a future decrease in GBI (linked to an increase in NAO), which highlights a likely key deficiency of current climate models if the recently observed circulation changes continue to persist. Given well-established connections between atmospheric pressure over the Greenland region and air temperature and precipitation extremes downstream, e.g. over northwest Europe, this brings into question the accuracy of simulated North Atlantic jet stream changes and resulting climatological anomalies over densely populated regions of northern Europe as well as of future projections of GrIS mass balance produced using global and regional climate models.

scholarly journals GCMs Derived Projection of Precipitation and Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Variation over N-W Himalayan Region

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Dharmaveer Singh ◽  
R.D. Gupta ◽  
Sanjay K. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Himalayan Region ◽  
Mean Annual Precipitation ◽  
Hadcm3 Model

The ensembles of two Global Climate Models (GCMs) namely, third generation Canadian Coupled Global Climate Model (CGCM3) and Hadley Center Coupled Model, version 3 (HadCM3) are used to project future precipitation in a part of North-Western (N-W) Himalayan region, India. Statistical downscaling method is used to downscale and generate future scenarios of precipitation at station scale from large scale climate variables obtained from GCMs. The observed historical precipitation data has been collected for three metrological stations, namely, Rampur, Sunni and Kasol falling in the basin for further analysis. The future trends and patterns in precipitation under scenarios A2 and A1B for CGCM3 model, and A2 and B2 for HadCM3 model are analyzed for these stations under three different time periods: 2020’s, 2050’s and 2080’s. An overall rise in mean annual precipitation under scenarios A2 and A1B for CGCM3 model have been noticed for future periods: 2020’s, 2050’s and 2080’s. Decrease, in precipitation has been found under A2 and B2 scenarios of HadCM3 model for 2050’s and slight increase for 2080’s periods. Based on the analysis of results, CGCM3 model has been found better for simulation of precipitation in comparison to HadCM3 model.Journal of Hydrology and Meteorology, Vol. 9(1) 2015, p.1-14

scholarly journals Connection of Quasi-Resonant Amplification to the Delay in Atmospheric Residence Times Over India

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. V. Lakshmi Kumar ◽  
G. Purna Durga ◽  
K. Koteswara Rao ◽  
Humberto Barbosa ◽  
Ashwini Kulkarni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Southwest Monsoon ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Extreme Weather Events ◽  
Residence Times ◽  
Tropical Country ◽  
Weather Events

Mean monthly Atmospheric Residence Times (ART), deduced from the global climate models of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios over Indian landmass, show a perceptible increase by the end of the 21st century. India, being a tropical country, faces prolonged ART, particularly during the June month of Southwest monsoon season (June to September) which will be an indicative measure of the increased frequency of extreme weather events. Here we show a possible connection of quasi-resonant amplification (QRA) to the recent (August 2018) Kerala heavy rains that resulted in severe floods and claimed more than 400 mortalities. Remarkable delay in residence times over India during June is shown to have an association with QRA evidenced by the higher magnitudes of amplitudes at the wavenumbers six and seven from the 19 global climate models of CMIP5 under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

scholarly journals Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 <i>midHolocene</i> simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1847-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris M. Brierley ◽  
Anni Zhao ◽  
Sandy P. Harrison ◽  
Pascale Braconnot ◽  
Charles J. R. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Current Phase ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. The mid-Holocene (6000 years ago) is a standard time period for the evaluation of the simulated response of global climate models using palaeoclimate reconstructions. The latest mid-Holocene simulations are a palaeoclimate entry card for the Palaeoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP4) component of the current phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) – hereafter referred to as PMIP4-CMIP6. Here we provide an initial analysis and evaluation of the results of the experiment for the mid-Holocene. We show that state-of-the-art models produce climate changes that are broadly consistent with theory and observations, including increased summer warming of the Northern Hemisphere and associated shifts in tropical rainfall. Many features of the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations were present in the previous generation (PMIP3-CMIP5) of simulations. The PMIP4-CMIP6 ensemble for the mid-Holocene has a global mean temperature change of −0.3 K, which is −0.2 K cooler than the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations predominantly as a result of the prescription of realistic greenhouse gas concentrations in PMIP4-CMIP6. Biases in the magnitude and the sign of regional responses identified in PMIP3-CMIP5, such as the amplification of the northern African monsoon, precipitation changes over Europe, and simulated aridity in mid-Eurasia, are still present in the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations. Despite these issues, PMIP4-CMIP6 and the mid-Holocene provide an opportunity both for quantitative evaluation and derivation of emergent constraints on the hydrological cycle, feedback strength, and potentially climate sensitivity.

scholarly journals Recent changes in summer Greenland blocking captured by none of the CMIP5 models

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Hanna ◽  
Xavier Fettweis ◽  
Richard J. Hall
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cmip5 Models

Abstract. Recent studies note a significant increase in high-pressure blocking over the Greenland region (Greenland Blocking Index, GBI) in summer since the 1990s. Such a general circulation change, indicated by a negative trend in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index, is generally highlighted as a major driver of recent surface melt records observed on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS). Here we compare reanalysis-based GBI records with those from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) suite of global climate models over 1950–2100. We find that the recent summer GBI increase lies well outside the range of modelled past reconstructions (Historical scenario) and future GBI projections (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). The models consistently project a future decrease in GBI (linked to an increase in NAO), which highlights a likely key deficiency of current climate models if the recently-observed circulation changes continue to persist. Given well-established connections between atmospheric pressure over the Greenland region and air temperature and precipitation extremes downstream, e.g. over Northwest Europe, this brings into question the accuracy of simulated North Atlantic jet stream changes and resulting climatological anomalies over densely populated regions of northern Europe as well as of future projections of GrIS mass balance produced using global and regional climate models.

scholarly journals Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 midHolocene simulations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Brierley ◽  
Anni Zhao ◽  
Sandy Harrison ◽  
Pascale Braconnot ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Model Complexity ◽  
Current Phase ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project

&lt;p&gt;The mid-Holocene (6,000 years ago) is a standard experiment for the evaluation of the simulated response of global climate models using paleoclimate reconstructions. The latest mid-Holocene simulations are a contribution by the Palaeoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP4) to the current phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Here we provide an initial analysis and evaluation of the results of the experiment for the mid-Holocene. We show that state-of-the-art models produce climate changes that are broadly consistent with theory and observations, including increased summer warming of the northern hemisphere and associated shifts in tropical rainfall. &amp;#160;Many features of the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations were present in the previous generation (PMIP3-CMIP5) of simulations. The PMIP4-CMIP6 ensemble for the mid-Holocene has a global mean temperature change of -0.3 K, which is -0.2 K cooler that the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations predominantly as a result of the prescription of realistic greenhouse gas concentrations in PMIP4-CMIP6. Neither this difference nor the improvement in model complexity and resolution seems to improve the realism of the simulations. Biases in the magnitude and the sign of regional responses identified in PMIP3-CMIP5, such as the amplification of the northern African monsoon, precipitation changes over Europe and simulated aridity in mid-Eurasia, are still present in the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations. Despite these issues, PMIP4-CMIP6 and the mid-Holocene provide an opportunity both for quantitative evaluation and derivation of emergent constraints on climate sensitivity and feedback strength.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 <i>midHolocene</i> simulations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris M. Brierley ◽  
Anni Zhao ◽  
Sandy P. Harrison ◽  
Pascale Braconnot ◽  
Charles J. R. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Model Complexity ◽  
Current Phase ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. The mid-Holocene (6000 years ago) is a standard experiment for the evaluation of the simulated response of global climate models using paleoclimate reconstructions. The latest mid-Holocene simulations are a contribution by the Palaeoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP4) to the current phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Here we provide an initial analysis and evaluation of the results of the experiment for the mid-Holocene. We show that state-of-the-art models produce climate changes that are broadly consistent with theory and observations, including increased summer warming of the northern hemisphere and associated shifts in tropical rainfall. Many features of the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations were present in the previous generation (PMIP3-CMIP5) of simulations. The PMIP4-CMIP6 ensemble for the mid-Holocene has a global mean temperature change of −0.3 K, which is −0.2 K cooler that the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations predominantly as a result of the prescription of realistic greenhouse gas concentrations in PMIP4-CMIP6. Neither this difference nor the improvement in model complexity and resolution seems to improve the realism of the simulations. Biases in the magnitude and the sign of regional responses identified in PMIP3-CMIP5, such as the amplification of the northern African monsoon, precipitation changes over Europe and simulated aridity in mid-Eurasia, are still present in the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations. Despite these issues, PMIP4-CMIP6 and the mid-Holocene provide an opportunity both for quantitative evaluation and derivation of emergent constraints on climate sensitivity and feedback strength.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document