Determining latitudinal extent of energetic electron precipitation using MEPED on-board NOAA POES

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eldho Midhun Babu ◽  
Hilde Nesse Tyssøy ◽  
Christine Smith-Johnsen ◽  
Ville Aleksi Maliniemi ◽  
Josephine Alessandra Salice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Radiation Belts ◽  
Atmospheric Dynamics ◽  
Electron Precipitation ◽  
Atmospheric Effects ◽  
The Earth

<p>Energetic electron precipitation (EEP) from the plasma sheet and the radiation belts, can collide with gases in the atmosphere and deposit their energy. EEP increase the production of NOx and HOx, which will catalytically destroy stratospheric ozone, an important element of atmospheric dynamics. The particle precipitation also causes variation in the radiation belt population. Therefore, measurement of latitudinal extend of the precipitation boundaries is important in quantifying atmospheric effects of Sun-Earth interaction and threats to spacecrafts and astronauts in the Earth’s radiation belt. <br>This study uses measurements by MEPED detectors of six NOAA/POES and EUMETSAT/METOP satellites during the year 2010 to determine the latitudinal boundaries of EEP and its variability with geomagnetic activity and solar wind drivers. Variation of the boundaries with respect to different particle energies and magnetic local time is studied. The result will be a key element for constructing a model of EEP variability to be applied in atmosphere climate models.</p>

Determining latitudinal extent of energetic electron precipitation  using MEPED on-board NOAA POES

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eldho Midhun Babu ◽  
Hilde Nesse Tyssøy ◽  
Christine Smith-Johnsen ◽  
Ville Maliniemi ◽  
Josephine Alessandra Salice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Predictor Variable ◽  
Electron Precipitation ◽  
Atmospheric Effects ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters ◽  
Earth’S Radiation Belt

<p>Energetic electron precipitation (EEP) from the plasma sheet and the radiation belts, can collide with gases in the atmosphere and deposit their energy. EEP increase the production of NOx and HOx, which will catalytically destroy stratospheric ozone, an important element of atmospheric dynamics. Therefore, measurement of latitudinal extent of the precipitation boundaries is important in quantifying atmospheric effects of Sun-Earth interaction and threats to spacecrafts and astronauts in the Earth's radiation belt.<br>This study uses measurements by MEPED detectors of six NOAA/POES and EUMETSAT/METOP satellites from 2004 to 2014 to determine the latitudinal boundaries of EEP and its variability with geomagnetic activity and solar wind drivers. Variation of the boundaries with respect to different particle energies and magnetic local time is studied. Regression analyses are applied to determine the best predictor variable based on solar wind parameters and geomagnetic indices. The result will be a key element for constructing a model of EEP variability to be applied in atmosphere climate models.</p>

Solar wind structures and their effects on energetic electron precipitation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine Alessandra Salice ◽  
Hilde Nesse Tyssøy ◽  
Christine Smith-Johnsen ◽  
Eldho Midhun Babu
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Ozone Concentration ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Accurate Estimate ◽  
Electron Precipitation ◽  
Loss Cone ◽  
Speed Solar Wind

<p>Energetic electron precipitation (EEP) into the Earth's atmosphere can collide with gases and deposit their energy there. The collisions between electrons and atmospheric gasses initiate several chemical reactions which can reduce the ozone concentration. Ozone is critically important in the middle atmosphere energy budget as changes in the ozone concentration impact temperature and winds. EEP is not fully understood in terms of how much energy is being deposited and what the associated drivers are. An accurate quantification of EEP has limitations due to instrumental challenges and therefore imposes limitations of the associated EEP parameterization into climate models. A solution to this problem is a better understanding of the driver processes of energetic electron acceleration and precipitation, alongside optimized data handling. In this study the bounce loss cone fluxes are inferred from EEP measurements by the Medium Energy Proton and Electron Detector (MEPED) on board the Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellite (POES) and the Meteorological Operational Satellite Program of Europe (METOP) at tens of keV to relativistic energies. It investigates EEP in contexts of different solar wind structures: high-speed solar wind streams (HSSs) and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), during an eleven-year period from 2004 – 2014. While today's chemistry climate models only provide snapshots of EEP, independent of context, this study aims to understand the context EEP is created in, which will allow a more accurate estimate of the EEP to be applied in atmospheric climate models.</p>

The link between solar wind structures, geomagnetic indices, and energetic electron precipitation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine Salice ◽  
Hilde Nesse Tyssøy ◽  
Christine Smith-Johansen ◽  
Eldho Midhun Babu
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Ozone Concentration ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Accurate Estimate ◽  
Electron Precipitation ◽  
Loss Cone ◽  
Accurate Quantification

<p>Energetic electron precipitation (EEP) into the Earth’s atmosphere can collide with gases and deposit their energy there. The collisions between electrons and atmospheric gasses initiate several chemical reactions which can reduce the ozone concentration. Ozone is critically important in the middle atmosphere energy budget as changes in the ozone concentration impact temperature and winds. EEP is not fully understood in terms of how much energy is being deposited and what the associated drivers are.  An accurate quantification of EEP has limitations due to instrumental challenges and therefore imposes limitations of the associated EEP parameterization into climate models. A solution to this problem is a better understanding of the driver processes of energetic electron acceleration and precipitation, alongside optimized measurements. In this study the bounce loss cone fluxes are inferred from EEP measurements by MEPED on board NOAA/POES and EUMETSAT/METOP at tens of keV to relativistic energies. It investigates EEP in contexts of three different solar wind structures: high-speed streams, coronal mass ejections, and ambient or slow interstream solar wind, as well as geomagnetic activity. The study will focus on the year 2010 and aim to understand the context EEP is created in, which will allow a more accurate estimate of the EEP to be applied in atmospheric climate models</p>

scholarly journals Multi-satellite simultaneous observations of magnetopause and atmospheric losses of radiation belt electrons during an intense solar wind dynamic pressure pulse

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Xiang ◽  
Binbin Ni ◽  
Chen Zhou ◽  
Zhengyang Zou ◽  
Xudong Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Pressure Pulse ◽  
Electron Flux ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Angle Scattering ◽  
Radiation Belt Electrons ◽  
Atmospheric Loss

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Radiation belt electron flux dropouts are a kind of drastic variation in the Earth's magnetosphere, understanding of which is of both scientific and societal importance. Using electron flux data from a group of 14 satellites, we report multi-satellite simultaneous observations of magnetopause and atmospheric losses of radiation belt electrons during an event of intense solar wind dynamic pressure pulse. When the pulse occurred, magnetopause and atmospheric loss could take effect concurrently contributing to the electron flux dropout. Losses through the magnetopause were observed to be efficient and significant at <i>L</i> ≳ 5, owing to the magnetopause intrusion into <i>L</i> ∼ 6 and outward radial diffusion associated with sharp negative gradient in electron phase space density. Losses to the atmosphere were directly identified from the precipitating electron flux observations, for which pitch angle scattering by plasma waves could be mainly responsible. While the convection and substorm injections strongly enhanced the energetic electron fluxes up to hundreds of keV, they could delay other than avoid the occurrence of electron flux dropout at these energies. It is demonstrated that the pulse-time radiation belt electron flux dropout depends strongly on the specific interplanetary and magnetospheric conditions and that losses through the magnetopause and to the atmosphere and enhancements of substorm injection play an essential role in combination, which should be incorporated as a whole into future simulations for comprehending the nature of radiation belt electron flux dropouts.</p>

scholarly journals The driving mechanisms of particle precipitation during the moderate geomagnetic storm of 7 January 2005

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 2053-2068 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Longden ◽  
F. Honary ◽  
A. J. Kavanagh ◽  
J. Manninen
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
Geomagnetic Activity ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Electron Precipitation ◽  
Particle Precipitation ◽  
Substorm Activity

Abstract. The arrival of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) triggered a sudden storm commencement (SSC) at ~09:22 UT on the 7 January 2005. The ICME followed a quiet period in the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). We present global scale observations of energetic electron precipitation during the moderate geomagnetic storm driven by the ICME. Energetic electron precipitation is inferred from increases in cosmic noise absorption (CNA) recorded by stations in the Global Riometer Array (GLORIA). No evidence of CNA was observed during the first four hours of passage of the ICME or following the sudden commencement (SC) of the storm. This is consistent with the findings of Osepian and Kirkwood (2004) that SCs will only trigger precipitation during periods of geomagnetic activity or when the magnetic perturbation in the magnetosphere is substantial. CNA was only observed following enhanced coupling between the IMF and the magnetosphere, resulting from southward oriented IMF. Precipitation was observed due to substorm activity, as a result of the initial injection and particles drifting from the injection region. During the recovery phase of the storm, when substorm activity diminished, precipitation due to density driven increases in the solar wind dynamic pressure (Pdyn) were identified. A number of increases in Pdyn were shown to drive sudden impulses (SIs) in the geomagnetic field. While many of these SIs appear coincident with CNA, SIs without CNA were also observed. During this period, the threshold of geomagnetic activity required for SC driven precipitation was exceeded. This implies that solar wind density driven SIs occurring during storm recovery can drive a different response in particle precipitation to typical SCs.

scholarly journals Reactive nitrogen (NO<sub><i>y</i></sub>) and ozone responses to energetic electron precipitation during Southern Hemisphere winter

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 9485-9494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavle Arsenovic ◽  
Alessandro Damiani ◽  
Eugene Rozanov ◽  
Bernd Funke ◽  
Andrea Stenke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Solar Proton ◽  
Electron Precipitation ◽  
Reactive Nitrogen ◽  
High Electron

Abstract. Energetic particle precipitation (EPP) affects the chemistry of the polar middle atmosphere by producing reactive nitrogen (NOy) and hydrogen (HOx) species, which then catalytically destroy ozone. Recently, there have been major advances in constraining these particle impacts through a parametrization of NOy based on high-quality observations. Here we investigate the effects of low (auroral) and middle (radiation belt) energy range electrons, separately and in combination, on reactive nitrogen and hydrogen species as well as on ozone during Southern Hemisphere winters from 2002 to 2010 using the SOCOL3-MPIOM chemistry-climate model. Our results show that, in the absence of solar proton events, low-energy electrons produce the majority of NOy in the polar mesosphere and stratosphere. In the polar vortex, NOy subsides and affects ozone at lower altitudes, down to 10 hPa. Comparing a year with high electron precipitation with a quiescent period, we found large ozone depletion in the mesosphere; as the anomaly propagates downward, 15 % less ozone is found in the stratosphere during winter, which is confirmed by satellite observations. Only with both low- and middle-energy electrons does our model reproduce the observed stratospheric ozone anomaly.

scholarly journals Use of POES SEM-2 observations to examine radiation belt dynamics and energetic electron precipitation into the atmosphere

2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (A4) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig J. Rodger ◽  
Mark A. Clilverd ◽  
Janet C. Green ◽  
Mai Mai Lam
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Electron Precipitation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document