scholarly journals Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models, and their comparison to CMIP5 models

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Arora ◽  
Anna Katavouta ◽  
Richard Williams ◽  
Chris Jones ◽  
Victor Brovkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Small Temperature ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Earth System Models

<p>Results from the fully-, biogeochemically-, and radiatively-coupled simulations in which CO<sub>2</sub> increases at a rate of 1% per year (1pctCO2) from its pre-industrial value are analyzed to quantify the magnitude of two feedback parameters which characterize the coupled carbon-climate system. These feedback parameters quantify the response of ocean and terrestrial carbon pools to changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and the resulting change in global climate. The results are based on eight comprehensive Earth system models from the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and eleven models from the sixth CMIP (CMIP6). The comparison of model results from two CMIP phases shows that, for both land and ocean, the model mean values of the feedback parameters and their multi-model spread has not changed significantly across the two CMIP phases. The absolute values of feedback parameters are lower for land with models that include a representation of nitrogen cycle. The sensitivity of feedback parameters to the three different ways in which they may be calculated is shown and, consistent with existing studies, the most relevant definition is that calculated using results from the fully- and biogeochemically-coupled configurations. Based on these two simulations simplified expressions for the feedback parameters are obtained when the small temperature change in the biogeochemically-coupled simulation is ignored. Decomposition of the terms of these simplified expressions for the feedback parameters allows identification of the reasons for differing responses among ocean and land carbon cycle models.</p>

scholarly journals Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models, and their comparison to CMIP5 models

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek K. Arora ◽  
Anna Katavouta ◽  
Richard G. Williams ◽  
Chris D. Jones ◽  
Victor Brovkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Small Temperature ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. Results from the fully-, biogeochemically-, and radiatively-coupled simulations in which CO2 increases at a rate of 1 % per year (1pctCO2) from its pre-industrial value are analyzed to quantify the magnitude of two feedback parameters which characterize the coupled carbon-climate system. These feedback parameters quantify the response of ocean and terrestrial carbon pools to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration and the resulting change in global climate. The results are based on eight comprehensive Earth system models from the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and eleven models from the sixth CMIP (CMIP6). The comparison of model results from two CMIP phases shows that, for both land and ocean, the model mean values of the feedback parameters and their multi-model spread has not changed significantly across the two CMIP phases. The absolute values of feedback parameters are lower for land with models that include a representation of nitrogen cycle. The sensitivity of feedback parameters to the three different ways in which they may be calculated is shown and, consistent with existing studies, the most relevant definition is that calculated using results from the fully- and biogeochemically-coupled configurations. Based on these two simulations simplified expressions for the feedback parameters are obtained when the small temperature change in the biogeochemically-coupled simulation is ignored. Decomposition of the terms of these simplified expressions for the feedback parameters allows identification of the reasons for differing responses among ocean and land carbon cycle models.

scholarly journals ESM-SnowMIP: Assessing models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Krinner ◽  
Chris Derksen ◽  
Richard Essery ◽  
Mark Flanner ◽  
Stefan Hagemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Scale Modeling ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Modelling Effort ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. This paper describes ESM-SnowMIP, an international coordinated modelling effort to evaluate current snow schemes against local and global observations in a wide variety of settings, including snow schemes that are included in Earth System Models. The project aims at identifying crucial processes and snow characteristics that need to be improved in snow models in the context of local- and global-scale modeling. A further objective of ESM-SnowMIP is to better quantify snow-related feedbacks in the Earth system. ESM-SnowMIP is tightly linked to the Land Surface, Snow and Soil Moisture Model Intercomparison Project, which in turn is part of the 6th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6).

scholarly journals ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5027-5049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Krinner ◽  
Chris Derksen ◽  
Richard Essery ◽  
Mark Flanner ◽  
Stefan Hagemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Scale Modelling ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Modelling Effort ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. This paper describes ESM-SnowMIP, an international coordinated modelling effort to evaluate current snow schemes, including snow schemes that are included in Earth system models, in a wide variety of settings against local and global observations. The project aims to identify crucial processes and characteristics that need to be improved in snow models in the context of local- and global-scale modelling. A further objective of ESM-SnowMIP is to better quantify snow-related feedbacks in the Earth system. Although it is not part of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), ESM-SnowMIP is tightly linked to the CMIP6-endorsed Land Surface, Snow and Soil Moisture Model Intercomparison (LS3MIP).

scholarly journals Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 4173-4222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek K. Arora ◽  
Anna Katavouta ◽  
Richard G. Williams ◽  
Chris D. Jones ◽  
Victor Brovkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Concentration ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. Results from the fully and biogeochemically coupled simulations in which CO2 increases at a rate of 1 % yr−1 (1pctCO2) from its preindustrial value are analyzed to quantify the magnitude of carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedback parameters which measure the response of ocean and terrestrial carbon pools to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration and the resulting change in global climate, respectively. The results are based on 11 comprehensive Earth system models from the most recent (sixth) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and compared with eight models from the fifth CMIP (CMIP5). The strength of the carbon–concentration feedback is of comparable magnitudes over land (mean ± standard deviation = 0.97 ± 0.40 PgC ppm−1) and ocean (0.79 ± 0.07 PgC ppm−1), while the carbon–climate feedback over land (−45.1 ± 50.6 PgC ∘C−1) is about 3 times larger than over ocean (−17.2 ± 5.0 PgC ∘C−1). The strength of both feedbacks is an order of magnitude more uncertain over land than over ocean as has been seen in existing studies. These values and their spread from 11 CMIP6 models have not changed significantly compared to CMIP5 models. The absolute values of feedback parameters are lower for land with models that include a representation of nitrogen cycle. The transient climate response to cumulative emissions (TCRE) from the 11 CMIP6 models considered here is 1.77 ± 0.37 ∘C EgC−1 and is similar to that found in CMIP5 models (1.63 ± 0.48 ∘C EgC−1) but with somewhat reduced model spread. The expressions for feedback parameters based on the fully and biogeochemically coupled configurations of the 1pctCO2 simulation are simplified when the small temperature change in the biogeochemically coupled simulation is ignored. Decomposition of the terms of these simplified expressions for the feedback parameters is used to gain insight into the reasons for differing responses among ocean and land carbon cycle models.

scholarly journals Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (26) ◽  
pp. eaba1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald A. Meehl ◽  
Catherine A. Senior ◽  
Veronika Eyring ◽  
Gregory Flato ◽  
Jean-Francois Lamarque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity ◽  
System Models ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Earth System Models

For the current generation of earth system models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), the range of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, a hypothetical value of global warming at equilibrium for a doubling of CO2) is 1.8°C to 5.6°C, the largest of any generation of models dating to the 1990s. Meanwhile, the range of transient climate response (TCR, the surface temperature warming around the time of CO2 doubling in a 1% per year CO2 increase simulation) for the CMIP6 models of 1.7°C (1.3°C to 3.0°C) is only slightly larger than for the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Here we review and synthesize the latest developments in ECS and TCR values in CMIP, compile possible reasons for the current values as supplied by the modeling groups, and highlight future directions. Cloud feedbacks and cloud-aerosol interactions are the most likely contributors to the high values and increased range of ECS in CMIP6.

scholarly journals Differences in carbon cycle and temperature projections from emission- and concentration-driven earth system model simulations

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 991-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Shao ◽  
X. Zeng ◽  
X. Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Average Difference ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Feedback Parameter ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Atmospheric Co2 Concentrations ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. The influence of prognostic and prescribed atmospheric CO2 concentrations ([CO2]) on the carbon uptake and temperature is investigated using all eight Earth System Models (ESMs) with relevant output variables from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). Under the RCP8.5 scenario, the projected [CO2] differences in 2100 vary from −19.7 to +207.3 ppm in emission-driven ESMs. Incorporation of the interactive concentrations also increases the range of global warming, computed as the 20 year average difference between 2081–2100 and 1850–1869/1861–1880, by 49% from 2.36 K (i.e. ranging from 3.11 to 5.47 K) in the concentration-driven simulations to 3.51 K in the emission-driven simulations. The observed seasonal amplitude of global [CO2] from 1980–2011 is about 1.2–5.3 times as large as those from the eight emission-driven ESMs, while the [CO2] seasonality is simply neglected in concentration-driven ESMs, suggesting the urgent need of ESM improvements in this area. The temperature-concentration feedback parameter α is more sensitive to [CO2] (e.g. during 1980–2005 versus 2075–2100) than how [CO2] is handled (i.e. prognostic versus prescribed). This sensitivity can be substantially reduced by using a more appropriate parameter α' computed from the linear regression of temperature change versus that of the logarithm of [CO2]. However, the inter-model relative variations of both α and α' remain large, suggesting the need of more detailed studies to understand and hopefully reduce these discrepancies.

scholarly journals Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1827-1851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Séférian ◽  
Marion Gehlen ◽  
Laurent Bopp ◽  
Laure Resplandy ◽  
James C. Orr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Biogeochemical Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
System Models ◽  
Marine Biogeochemistry ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. During the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) substantial efforts were made to systematically assess the skill of Earth system models. One goal was to check how realistically representative marine biogeochemical tracer distributions could be reproduced by models. In routine assessments model historical hindcasts were compared with available modern biogeochemical observations. However, these assessments considered neither how close modeled biogeochemical reservoirs were to equilibrium nor the sensitivity of model performance to initial conditions or to the spin-up protocols. Here, we explore how the large diversity in spin-up protocols used for marine biogeochemistry in CMIP5 Earth system models (ESMs) contributes to model-to-model differences in the simulated fields. We take advantage of a 500-year spin-up simulation of IPSL-CM5A-LR to quantify the influence of the spin-up protocol on model ability to reproduce relevant data fields. Amplification of biases in selected biogeochemical fields (O2, NO3, Alk-DIC) is assessed as a function of spin-up duration. We demonstrate that a relationship between spin-up duration and assessment metrics emerges from our model results and holds when confronted with a larger ensemble of CMIP5 models. This shows that drift has implications for performance assessment in addition to possibly aliasing estimates of climate change impact. Our study suggests that differences in spin-up protocols could explain a substantial part of model disparities, constituting a source of model-to-model uncertainty. This requires more attention in future model intercomparison exercises in order to provide quantitatively more correct ESM results on marine biogeochemistry and carbon cycle feedbacks.

scholarly journals Experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Griffies ◽  
Gokhan Danabasoglu ◽  
Paul J. Durack ◽  
Alistair J. Adcroft ◽  
V. Balaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
Global Ocean ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Experimental Protocol ◽  
Diagnostic Protocol ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. The Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP) aims to provide a framework for evaluating, understanding, and improving the ocean and sea-ice components of global climate and earth system models contributing to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). OMIP addresses these aims in two complementary manners: (A) by providing an experimental protocol for global ocean/sea-ice models run with a prescribed atmospheric forcing, (B) by providing a protocol for ocean diagnostics to be saved as part of CMIP6. We focus here on the physical component of OMIP, with a companion paper (Orr et al., 2016) offering details for the inert chemistry and interactive biogeochemistry. The physical portion of the OMIP experimental protocol follows that of the interannual Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments (CORE-II). Since 2009, CORE-I (Normal Year Forcing) and CORE-II have become the standard method to evaluate global ocean/sea-ice simulations and to examine mechanisms for forced ocean climate variability. The OMIP diagnostic protocol is relevant for any ocean model component of CMIP6, including the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima experiments), historical simulations, FAFMIP (Flux Anomaly Forced MIP), C4MIP (Coupled Carbon Cycle Climate MIP), DAMIP (Detection and Attribution MIP), DCPP (Decadal Climate Prediction Project), ScenarioMIP (Scenario MIP), as well as the ocean-sea ice OMIP simulations. The bulk of this paper offers scientific rationale for saving these diagnostics.

Workflow and tools to analyse the PMIP4-CMIP6 ensemble

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anni Zhao ◽  
Chris Brierley
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Important Case ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Past Climate ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Intercomparison Project

<p>Experiment outputs are now available from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project’s 6<sup>th</sup> phase (CMIP6) and the past climate experiments defined in the Model Intercomparison Project’s 4<sup>th</sup> phase (PMIP4). All of this output is freely available from the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF). Yet there are overheads in analysing this resource that may prove complicated or prohibitive. Here we document the steps taken by ourselves to produce ensemble analyses covering past and future simulations. We outline the strategy used to curate, adjust the monthly calendar aggregation and process the information downloaded from the ESGF. The results of these steps were used to perform analysis for several of the initial publications arising from PMIP4. We provide post-processed fields for each simulation, such as climatologies and common measures of variability. Example scripts used to visualise and analyse these fields is provided for several important case studies.</p>

scholarly journals Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Séférian ◽  
Sarah Berthet ◽  
Andrew Yool ◽  
Julien Palmiéri ◽  
Laurent Bopp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Current Generation ◽  
System Models ◽  
Biogeochemical Models ◽  
Marine Biogeochemistry ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract Purpose of Review The changes or updates in ocean biogeochemistry component have been mapped between CMIP5 and CMIP6 model versions, and an assessment made of how far these have led to improvements in the simulated mean state of marine biogeochemical models within the current generation of Earth system models (ESMs). Recent Findings The representation of marine biogeochemistry has progressed within the current generation of Earth system models. However, it remains difficult to identify which model updates are responsible for a given improvement. In addition, the full potential of marine biogeochemistry in terms of Earth system interactions and climate feedback remains poorly examined in the current generation of Earth system models. Summary Increasing availability of ocean biogeochemical data, as well as an improved understanding of the underlying processes, allows advances in the marine biogeochemical components of the current generation of ESMs. The present study scrutinizes the extent to which marine biogeochemistry components of ESMs have progressed between the 5th and the 6th phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document