scholarly journals Review of "Snow profile alignment and similarity assessment for aggregating, clustering, and evaluating of snowpack model output for avalanche forecasting"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Lafaysse
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-258
Author(s):  
Florian Herla ◽  
Simon Horton ◽  
Patrick Mair ◽  
Pascal Haegeli

Abstract. Snowpack models simulate the evolution of the snow stratigraphy based on meteorological inputs and have the potential to support avalanche risk management operations with complementary information relevant for their avalanche hazard assessment, especially in data-sparse regions or at times of unfavorable weather and hazard conditions. However, the adoption of snowpack models in operational avalanche forecasting has been limited, predominantly due to missing data processing algorithms and uncertainty around model validity. Thus, to enhance the usefulness of snowpack models for the avalanche industry, numerical methods are required that evaluate and summarize snowpack model output in accessible and relevant ways. We present algorithms that compare and assess generic snowpack data from both human observations and models, which consist of multidimensional sequences describing the snow characteristics of grain type, hardness, and age. Our approach exploits Dynamic Time Warping, a well-established method in the data sciences, to match layers between snow profiles and thereby align them. The similarity of the aligned profiles is then evaluated by our independent similarity measure based on characteristics relevant for avalanche hazard assessment. Since our methods provide the necessary quantitative link to data clustering and aggregating methods, we demonstrate how snowpack model output can be grouped and summarized according to similar hazard conditions. By emulating aspects of the human avalanche hazard assessment process, our methods aim to promote the operational application of snowpack models so that avalanche forecasters can begin to build an understanding of how to interpret and trust operational snowpack simulations.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Herla ◽  
Simon Horton ◽  
Patrick Mair ◽  
Pascal Haegeli

Abstract. Snowpack models simulate the evolution of the snow stratigraphy based on meteorological inputs and have the potential to support avalanche risk management operations with complementary information relevant to their avalanche hazard assessment, especially in data-sparse regions or at times of unfavorable weather and hazard conditions. However, the adoption of snowpack models in operational avalanche forecasting has been limited, predominantly due to missing data processing algorithms and uncertainty around model validity. Thus, to enhance the usefulness of snowpack models for the avalanche industry, numerical methods are required that evaluate and summarize snowpack model output in accessible and relevant ways. We present algorithms that compare and assess generic snowpack data from both human observations and models. Our approach exploits Dynamic Time Warping, a well-established method in the data sciences, to match layers between snow profiles and thereby align them. The similarity of the aligned profiles is then evaluated by our independent similarity measure based on characteristics relevant for avalanche hazard assessment. Since our methods provide the necessary quantitative link to data clustering and aggregating methods, we demonstrate how snowpack model output can be grouped and summarized according to similar hazard conditions. Through emulating a human avalanche hazard assessment approach, our methods aim to promote the operational application of snowpack models so that avalanche forecasters can begin to build understanding in how to interpret and when to trust operational snowpack simulations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Reuter ◽  
Léo Viallon-Galinier ◽  
Stephanie Mayer ◽  
Pascal Hagenmuller ◽  
Samuel Morin

<p>Snow cover models have mostly been developed to support avalanche forecasting. Recently developed snow instability metrics can help interpreting modeled snow cover data. However, presently snow cover models cannot forecast the relevant avalanche problem types – an essential element to describe avalanche danger. We present an approach to detect, track and assess weak layers in snow cover model output data to eventually assess the related avalanche problem type. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach with both, SNOWPACK and CROCUS snow cover model output for one winter season at Weissfluhjoch. We introduced a classification scheme for four commonly used avalanche problem types including new snow, wind slabs, persistent weak layers and wet snow, so different avalanche situations during a winter season can be classified based on weak layer type and meteorological conditions. According to the modeled avalanche problem types and snow instability metrics both models produced weaknesses in the modeled stratigraphy during similar periods. For instance, in late December 2014 the models picked up a non-persistent as well as a persistent weak layer that were both observed in the field and caused widespread instability in the area. Times when avalanches released naturally were recorded with two seismic avalanche detection systems, and coincided reasonably well with periods of low modeled stability. Moreover, the presented approach provides the avalanche problem types that relate to the observed natural instability which makes the interpretation of modeled snow instability metrics easier. As the presented approach is process-based, it is applicable to any model in any snow avalanche climate. It could be used to anticipate changes in avalanche problem type due to changing climate. Moreover, the presented approach is suited to support the interpretation of snow stratigraphy data for operational forecasting.</p>


2004 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 215-222
Author(s):  
Claudia Roeger ◽  
David M. McClung ◽  
Roland Stull

AbstractThe combination of numerical weather prediction (NWP) and snow avalanche forecasting has been performed using the output of two weather models run at the University of British Columbia, Canada, and a local numerical avalanche-forecasting model developed for Kootenay Pass (McClung and Tweedy, 1994). The main motivations for this work are. (1) to extend the lead time of avalanche forecasts by using NWP forecasts of meteorological variables as input to statistical avalanche-threat models (instead of the traditional method of using current/past observed meteorological variables as input); and (2) to create another tool to help avalanche forecasters in their daily decision-making by making true forecasts instead of “nowcasts”. Therefore, verified weather-forecast model output was used as input for the local avalanche-forecasting model at Kootenay Pass. The resulting 24 hour avalanche forecast was compared to observed avalanche occurrences and to the 12 hour avalanche forecast with current weather observations. As a result, the avalanche-model output for the test runs with numerically predicted weather data is comparable in accuracy to the runs with observed weather data. The results also suggest that avalanches may be predicted statistically for 24 hours into the future when high-resolution NWP is used as input, weather- and avalanche-forecast errors taken into account during operational use.


1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Hua Lei ◽  
Wolfgang Schilling

Physically-based urban rainfall-runoff models are mostly applied without parameter calibration. Given some preliminary estimates of the uncertainty of the model parameters the associated model output uncertainty can be calculated. Monte-Carlo simulation followed by multi-linear regression is used for this analysis. The calculated model output uncertainty can be compared to the uncertainty estimated by comparing model output and observed data. Based on this comparison systematic or spurious errors can be detected in the observation data, the validity of the model structure can be confirmed, and the most sensitive parameters can be identified. If the calculated model output uncertainty is unacceptably large the most sensitive parameters should be calibrated to reduce the uncertainty. Observation data for which systematic and/or spurious errors have been detected should be discarded from the calibration data. This procedure is referred to as preliminary uncertainty analysis; it is illustrated with an example. The HYSTEM program is applied to predict the runoff volume from an experimental catchment with a total area of 68 ha and an impervious area of 20 ha. Based on the preliminary uncertainty analysis, for 7 of 10 events the measured runoff volume is within the calculated uncertainty range, i.e. less than or equal to the calculated model predictive uncertainty. The remaining 3 events include most likely systematic or spurious errors in the observation data (either in the rainfall or the runoff measurements). These events are then discarded from further analysis. After calibrating the model the predictive uncertainty of the model is estimated.


1983 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Fitzharris ◽  
McNulty ◽  
Owens ◽  
Miller

BioDrugs ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katariina M. Hutterer ◽  
Anna Ip ◽  
Scott Kuhns ◽  
Shawn Cao ◽  
Mats Wikström ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (6) ◽  
pp. 1960-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob W. Messner ◽  
Georg J. Mayr

Abstract Three methods to make probabilistic weather forecasts by using analogs are presented and tested. The basic idea of these methods is that finding similar NWP model forecasts to the current one in an archive of past forecasts and taking the corresponding analyses as prediction should remove all systematic errors of the model. Furthermore, this statistical postprocessing can convert NWP forecasts to forecasts for point locations and easily turn deterministic forecasts into probabilistic ones. These methods are tested in the idealized Lorenz96 system and compared to a benchmark bracket formed by ensemble relative frequencies from direct model output and logistic regression. The analog methods excel at longer lead times.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document