scholarly journals Ubiquitous increases in flood magnitude in the Columbia River basin under climate change

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-272
Author(s):  
Laura E. Queen ◽  
Philip W. Mote ◽  
David E. Rupp ◽  
Oriana Chegwidden ◽  
Bart Nijssen

Abstract. The USA and Canada have entered negotiations to modernize the Columbia River Treaty, signed in 1961. Key priorities are balancing flood risk and hydropower production, and improving aquatic ecosystem function while incorporating projected effects of climate change. In support of the US effort, Chegwidden et al. (2017) developed a large-ensemble dataset of past and future daily streamflows at 396 sites throughout the Columbia River basin (CRB) and selected other watersheds in western Washington and Oregon, using state-of-the art climate and hydrologic models. In this study, we use that dataset to present new analyses of the effects of future climate change on flooding using water year maximum daily streamflows. For each simulation, flood statistics are estimated from generalized extreme value distributions fit to simulated water year maximum daily streamflows for 50-year windows of the past (1950–1999) and future (2050–2099) periods. Our results contrast with previous findings: we find that the vast majority of locations in the CRB are estimated to experience an increase in future streamflow magnitudes. The near ubiquity of increases is all the more remarkable in that our approach explores a larger set of methodological variation than previous studies; however, like previous studies, our modeling system was not calibrated to minimize error in maximum daily streamflow and may be affected by unquantifiable errors. We show that on the Columbia and Willamette rivers increases in streamflow magnitudes are smallest downstream and grow larger moving upstream. For the Snake River, however, the pattern is reversed, with increases in streamflow magnitudes growing larger moving downstream to the confluence with the Salmon River tributary and then abruptly dropping. We decompose the variation in results attributable to variability in climate and hydrologic factors across the ensemble, finding that climate contributes more variation in larger basins, while hydrology contributes more in smaller basins. Equally important for practical applications like flood control rule curves, the seasonal timing of flooding shifts dramatically on some rivers (e.g., on the Snake, 20th-century floods occur exclusively in late spring, but by the end of the 21st century some floods occur as early as December) and not at all on others (e.g., the Willamette River).

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Queen ◽  
Philip W. Mote ◽  
David E. Rupp ◽  
Oriana Chegwidden ◽  
Bart Nijssen

Abstract. The US and Canada have entered negotiations to modernize the Columbia River Treaty, signed in 1961. Key priorities are balancing flood risk, hydropower production, and improving aquatic ecosystem function while incorporating projected effects of climate change. In support of the US effort, Chegwidden et al. (2017) developed a large-ensemble dataset of past and future daily flows at 396 sites throughout the Columbia River Basin (CRB) and select other watersheds in western Washington and Oregon, generating a large ensemble using state-of-the art climate and hydrologic models. In this study, we use that dataset – the largest now available – to present new analyses of the effects of future climate change on flooding using water year maximum daily flows. For each simulation, flood statistics are estimated from Generalized Extreme Value distributions fit to simulated water year maximum daily flows for 50-year windows of the past (1950–1999) and future (2050–2099) periods. Our results contrast with previous findings: we find that the vast majority of locations in the CRB are estimated to experience an increase in future discharge magnitudes. We show that on the Columbia and Willamette rivers, increases in discharge magnitudes are smallest downstream and grow larger moving upstream. For the Snake River, however, the pattern is reversed, with increases in discharge magnitudes growing larger moving downstream to the confluence with the Salmon River tributary, and then abruptly dropping. We decompose the variation in results attributable to climate and hydrologic factors, finding that climate contributes more variation in larger basins while hydrology contributes more in smaller basins. Equally important for practical applications like flood control rule curves, the seasonal timing of flooding shifts dramatically on some rivers (e.g., on the Snake, 20th century floods occur exclusively in late spring, but by the end of the 21st century some floods occur as early as December) and not at all on others (e.g. the Willamette).


Author(s):  
Se-Yeun Lee ◽  
Alan F. Hamlet ◽  
Carolyn J. Fitzgerald ◽  
Stephen J. Burges ◽  
Dennis P. Lettenmaier

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stewart J. Cohen ◽  
Kathleen A. Miller ◽  
Alan F. Hamlet ◽  
Wendy Avis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 3671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Touseef ◽  
Lihua Chen ◽  
Tabinda Masud ◽  
Aziz Khan ◽  
Kaipeng Yang ◽  
...  

Hydrological models are widely applied for simulating complex watershed processes and directly linking meteorological, topographical, land-use, and geological conditions. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated at two monitoring stations, which improved model performance and increased the reliability of flow predictions in the Upper Xijiang River Basin. This study evaluated the potential impacts of climate change on the streamflow and water yield of the Upper Xijiang River Basin using Arc-SWAT. The model was calibrated (1991–1997) and validated (1998–2001) using the Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Algorithm (SUFI-2). Model calibration and validation suggest a good match between the measured and simulated monthly streamflow, indicating the applicability of the model for future daily streamflow predictions. Large negative changes of low flows are projected under future climate scenarios, exhibiting a 10% and 30% decrease in water yield over the watershed on a monthly scale. Overall, findings generally indicated that winter flows are expected to be affected the most, with a maximum impact during the January–April period, followed by the wet monsoon season in the May–September period. Water balance components of the Upper Xijiang River Basin are expected to change significantly due to the projected climate change that, in turn, will seriously affect the water resources and streamflow patterns in the future. Thus, critical problems, such as ground water shortages, drops in agricultural crop yield, and increases in domestic water demand are expected at the Xijiang River Basin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document