scholarly journals COORDINATION OF PLANETARY COORDINATE SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE IAU WORKING GROUP ON CARTOGRAPHIC COORDINATES AND ROTATIONAL ELEMENTS – 2020 STATUS AND FUTURE

Author(s):  
B. A. Archinal ◽  
C. H. Acton ◽  
A. Conrad ◽  
T. C. Duxbury ◽  
D. Hestroffer ◽  
...  

Abstract. Our goal is to request input from the lunar and planetary community regarding issues of planetary coordinate systems and cartography standards. We begin with an overview of the work of the International Astronomical Union Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements. We briefly describe the operations and membership of the Working Group, some of the various uses of the recommendations it makes, our most recent (2018) published report and the recommendations therein, and the outlook for our next such report. We then consider several issues and questions regarding the future of the Working Group and regarding planetary cartography and planetary data spatial infrastructure in general. This includes possible near-term projects, how we and others might collect and consider community input and includes some ideas regarding possible outcomes or future work that will need to be addressed by the Working Group or other organizations.

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 21-26

An ideal definition of a reference coordinate system should meet the following general requirements:1. It should be as conceptually simple as possible, so its philosophy is well understood by the users.2. It should imply as few physical assumptions as possible. Wherever they are necessary, such assumptions should be of a very general character and, in particular, they should not be dependent upon astronomical and geophysical detailed theories.3. It should suggest a materialization that is dynamically stable and is accessible to observations with the required accuracy.


1966 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-609
Author(s):  
A. H. Cook

The Chairman, W. Fricke, President of Commission 4, opened the Joint Discussion by drawing attention to the purpose and proposed procedure for the meeting. The Joint Discussion had been arranged by the Executive Committee of the Union in order to avoid the necessity for separate discussions by each Commission that was affected by the Report of the Working Group on the IAU System of Astronomical Constants. The Organizing Committee therefore proposed the following resolution:‘The members of the IAU at this Joint Discussion recommend to the Executive Committee that the following resolution be put before the General Assembly: “The International Astronomical Union endorses the final list of constants prepared by the Working Group on the System of Astronomical Constants and recommends that it be used in the national and international astronomical ephemerides at the earliest practicable date.’”


1966 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 604-606
Author(s):  
W. Fricke

The Chairman, W. Fricke, President of Commission 4, opened the Joint Discussion by drawing attention to the purpose and proposed procedure for the meeting. The Joint Discussion had been arranged by the Executive Committee of the Union in order to avoid the necessity for separate discussions by each Commission that was affected by the Report of the Working Group on the IAU System of Astronomical Constants. The Organizing Committee therefore proposed the following resolution:‘The members of the IAU at this Joint Discussion recommend to the Executive Committee that the following resolution be put before the General Assembly: “The International Astronomical Union endorses the final list of constants prepared by the Working Group on the System of Astronomical Constants and recommends that it be used in the national and international astronomical ephemerides at the earliest practicable date.’”


2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (T26A) ◽  
pp. 181-181
Author(s):  
Kennet P. Seidelman ◽  
M.F. A'HEARN ◽  
D.P. CRUIKSHANK ◽  
J.L. HILTON ◽  
H.U. KELLER ◽  
...  

The 2003 report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements has appeared in Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy(2005)volume 91, part 3–4, pages 203–215. The Working Group continues to maintain and update the information for cartographic coordinates and rotational elements for the Sun, Moon, planets, satellites, asteroids, and comets. A report is published treannually. A web site is maintained at http://extranet.astrogeology.wr.usgs.gov/Projects/WGCCRE with the up-to-date information. It is anticipated that the next report will include updates for Saturn (rotation rate) and all of the Saturnian moons, additions for the newly visited comets and asteroids, and a clarification of the Moon's coordinate systems (the mean Earth/polar axis system needs to be defined more precisely).


1993 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 357-362
Author(s):  
P. K. Seidelmann

At the International Astronomical Union General Assembly in 1991 the terminologies Geocentric Coordinate Time (TCG) and Barycentric Coordinate Time (TCB) were introduced as the time coordinates of four dimensional geocentric and barycentric coordinate systems, respectively. The reasons for these time-like arguments and their applications will be discussed. The relationships between the different time-like arguments will be discussed along with their applications and relationships to the astronomical constants.Since these time-like arguments have secular differences, there are new issues to be resolved. These new issues include the definition of the epoch J2000.0, relationship between mean and apparent sidereal time, the time-like argument for specifying constants, the definition and future use of ephemeris time, delta T values and the transition to, or future use of, TCG, TCB and TDB.


1966 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-614
Author(s):  
G. M. Clemence

The Chairman, W. Fricke, President of Commission 4, opened the Joint Discussion by drawing attention to the purpose and proposed procedure for the meeting. The Joint Discussion had been arranged by the Executive Committee of the Union in order to avoid the necessity for separate discussions by each Commission that was affected by the Report of the Working Group on the IAU System of Astronomical Constants. The Organizing Committee therefore proposed the following resolution:‘The members of the IAU at this Joint Discussion recommend to the Executive Committee that the following resolution be put before the General Assembly: “The International Astronomical Union endorses the final list of constants prepared by the Working Group on the System of Astronomical Constants and recommends that it be used in the national and international astronomical ephemerides at the earliest practicable date.’”


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 27-38

For a reference coordinate system to be useful to Blarth dynamics it must clearly display the phenomena of interest in a systematic and unambiguous way, free of detailed assumptions. For a clear display, it is absolutely essential that the system be realized to an accuracy substantially better than has been obtained heretofore. This demands not only improved measuring techniques and instruments, but also precise specification of computational procedures, assumptions, fundamental constants, etc., and meticulous implementation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (T29A) ◽  
pp. 209-218
Author(s):  
Lars Lindberg Christensen ◽  
Pedro Russo ◽  
Richard Tresch Fienberg ◽  
Sze-leung Cheung ◽  
Ian Robson ◽  
...  

The IAU Division C Commission 55, Communicating Astronomy with the Public, played an active role in Union affairs within Division C, Education, Outreach and Heritage. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) vested considerable responsibility for its public outreach efforts in Commission 55 (C55), Communicating Astronomy with the Public. This article briefly recounts the origin and history of C55 over the past decade, and describes the work of C55 until it became Division C Commission C.C2 in 2015. As stated on our website, http://www.communicatingastronomy.org, C55 was founded on the principle that “it is the responsibility of every practising astronomer to play some role in explaining the interest and value of science to our real employers, the taxpayers of the world.” While this was true a decade ago, when the Working Group that eventually became C55 first took shape, it is even more true today, when funding for the astronomical sciences (and science more generally) is under threat on nearly every continent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document