2.3. Working Group 3: Practical Realization of the Reference Coordinate Systems

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 27-38

For a reference coordinate system to be useful to Blarth dynamics it must clearly display the phenomena of interest in a systematic and unambiguous way, free of detailed assumptions. For a clear display, it is absolutely essential that the system be realized to an accuracy substantially better than has been obtained heretofore. This demands not only improved measuring techniques and instruments, but also precise specification of computational procedures, assumptions, fundamental constants, etc., and meticulous implementation.

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 21-26

An ideal definition of a reference coordinate system should meet the following general requirements:1. It should be as conceptually simple as possible, so its philosophy is well understood by the users.2. It should imply as few physical assumptions as possible. Wherever they are necessary, such assumptions should be of a very general character and, in particular, they should not be dependent upon astronomical and geophysical detailed theories.3. It should suggest a materialization that is dynamically stable and is accessible to observations with the required accuracy.


1980 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
J. D. Mulholland

AbstractChanges in reference coordinate systems have major implications well beyond the realm of Earth dynamics. Definitions that serve geodynamic convenience may cause considerable effects for other disciplines. After presenting some typical areas in which coordinate frame definitions are important, recommendations are given for criteria to be considered as boundary conditions in discussing changes. These cover such qualities as observability, complexity, stability, internal coherence and uniqueness.


Author(s):  
B. A. Archinal ◽  
C. H. Acton ◽  
A. Conrad ◽  
T. C. Duxbury ◽  
D. Hestroffer ◽  
...  

Abstract. Our goal is to request input from the lunar and planetary community regarding issues of planetary coordinate systems and cartography standards. We begin with an overview of the work of the International Astronomical Union Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements. We briefly describe the operations and membership of the Working Group, some of the various uses of the recommendations it makes, our most recent (2018) published report and the recommendations therein, and the outlook for our next such report. We then consider several issues and questions regarding the future of the Working Group and regarding planetary cartography and planetary data spatial infrastructure in general. This includes possible near-term projects, how we and others might collect and consider community input and includes some ideas regarding possible outcomes or future work that will need to be addressed by the Working Group or other organizations.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 15-20

As initial guidance for its deliberations, Working Group 1 accepted the objective implied in the Colloquium title and the more explicit description contained in the First Circular announcing the Colloquium:Earth dynamics is currently the subject of intensive world-wide research efforts. As a consequence of the new insights into Earth dynamics and acceptance of the hypothesis of moving tectonic plates, as well as the ability to measure crustal motions on a global scale with a precision of a few centimeters, a number of national and international projects have been organized to pursue these investigations. In all these efforts, a common feature is the necessity for a very well defined coordinate system to which all observations can be referred and in which theories can be formulated. At this time there is no widely accepted coordinate system in the Earth or in space which is defined with the precision needed for ongoing geodynamics research.


1981 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
V. S. Kislyuk

The selection of selenodetic reference coordinate system is an important problem in astronomy and selenodesy. For the purposes of reduction of observations, planning and executing space missions to the Moon, it is necessary, in any case, to know the orientation of the adopted selenodetic reference system in respect to the inertial coordinate system.Let us introduce the following coordinate systems: C(ξc, ηc, ζc), the Cassini system which is defined by the Cassini laws of the Moon rotation;D(ξd, ηd, ζd), the dynamical coordinate system, whose axes coincide with the principal axes of inertia of the Moon;Q(ξq, ηq, ζq), the quasi-dynamical coordinate system connected with the mean direction to the Earth, which is shifted by 254" West and 75" North from the longest axis of the dynamical system (Williams et al., 1973);S(ξs, ηs, ζs), the selenodetic coordinate system, which is practically realized by the positions of the points on the Moon surface given in Catalogues;I(X,Y,Z), the space-fixed (inertial) coordinate system. All the systems are selenocentric with the exception of S(ξs, ηs, ζs On the whole, the origin of this system does not coincide with the center of mass of the Moon.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
P. L. Bender

AbstractFive important geodynamical quantities which are closely linked are: 1) motions of points on the Earth’s surface; 2)polar motion; 3) changes in UT1-UTC; 4) nutation; and 5) motion of the geocenter. For each of these we expect to achieve measurements in the near future which have an accuracy of 1 to 3 cm or 0.3 to 1 milliarcsec.From a metrological point of view, one can say simply: “Measure each quantity against whichever coordinate system you can make the most accurate measurements with respect to”. I believe that this statement should serve as a guiding principle for the recommendations of the colloquium. However, it also is important that the coordinate systems help to provide a clear separation between the different phenomena of interest, and correspond closely to the conceptual definitions in terms of which geophysicists think about the phenomena.In any discussion of angular motion in space, both a “body-fixed” system and a “space-fixed” system are used. Some relevant types of coordinate systems, reference directions, or reference points which have been considered are: 1) celestial systems based on optical star catalogs, distant galaxies, radio source catalogs, or the Moon and inner planets; 2) the Earth’s axis of rotation, which defines a line through the Earth as well as a celestial reference direction; 3) the geocenter; and 4) “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate systems.When a geophysicists discusses UT1 and polar motion, he usually is thinking of the angular motion of the main part of the mantle with respect to an inertial frame and to the direction of the spin axis. Since the velocities of relative motion in most of the mantle are expectd to be extremely small, even if “substantial” deep convection is occurring, the conceptual “quasi-Earth-fixed” reference frame seems well defined. Methods for realizing a close approximation to this frame fortunately exist. Hopefully, this colloquium will recommend procedures for establishing and maintaining such a system for use in geodynamics. Motion of points on the Earth’s surface and of the geocenter can be measured against such a system with the full accuracy of the new techniques.The situation with respect to celestial reference frames is different. The various measurement techniques give changes in the orientation of the Earth, relative to different systems, so that we would like to know the relative motions of the systems in order to compare the results. However, there does not appear to be a need for defining any new system. Subjective figures of merit for the various system dependon both the accuracy with which measurements can be made against them and the degree to which they can be related to inertial systems.The main coordinate system requirement related to the 5 geodynamic quantities discussed in this talk is thus for the establishment and maintenance of a “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate system which closely approximates the motion of the main part of the mantle. Changes in the orientation of this system with respect to the various celestial systems can be determined by both the new and the conventional techniques, provided that some knowledge of changes in the local vertical is available. Changes in the axis of rotation and in the geocenter with respect to this system also can be obtained, as well as measurements of nutation.


1979 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 349-355
Author(s):  
R.W. Milkey

The focus of discussion in Working Group 3 was on the Thermodynamic Properties as determined spectroscopically, including the observational techniques and the theoretical modeling of physical processes responsible for the emission spectrum. Recent advances in observational techniques and theoretical concepts make this discussion particularly timely. It is wise to remember that the determination of thermodynamic parameters is not an end in itself and that these are interesting chiefly for what they can tell us about the energetics and mass transport in prominences.


2020 ◽  
Vol 962 (8) ◽  
pp. 24-37
Author(s):  
V.E. Tereshchenko

The article suggests a technique for relation global kinematic reference system and local static realization of global reference system by regional continuously operated reference stations (CORS) network. On the example of regional CORS network located in the Novosibirsk Region (CORS NSO) the relation parameters of the global reference system WGS-84 and its local static realization by CORS NSO network at the epoch of fixing stations coordinates in catalog are calculated. With the realization of this technique, the main parameters to be determined are the speed of displacement one system center relativly to another and the speeds of rotation the coordinate axes of one system relatively to another, since the time evolution of most stations in the Russian Federation is not currently provided. The article shows the scale factor for relation determination of coordinate systems is not always necessary to consider. The technique described in the article also allows detecting the errors in determining the coordinates of CORS network in global coordinate system and compensate for them. A systematic error of determining and fixing the CORS NSO coordinates in global coordinate system was detected. It is noted that the main part of the error falls on the altitude component and reaches 12 cm. The proposed technique creates conditions for practical use of the advanced method Precise Point Positioning (PPP) in some regions of the Russian Federation. Also the technique will ensure consistent PPP method results with the results of the most commonly used in the Russian Federation other post-processing methods of high-precision positioning.


1990 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 99-110
Author(s):  
Han Chun-Hao ◽  
Huang Tian-Yi ◽  
Xu Bang-Xin

The concept of reference system, reference frame, coordinate system and celestial sphere in a relativistic framework are given. The problems on the choice of celestial coordinate systems and the definition of the light deflection are discussed. Our suggestions are listed in Sec. 5.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document